References
Bunge, M.: 1981, ‘Biopopulations, Not Biospecies, Are Species and Evolve’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 284–285.
Cracraft, J.: 1983, ‘Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis’, Current Ornithology 1, 159–187.
Cracraft, J.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts and the Ontology of Evolution’, Biology and Philosophy, 2, 329–346.
Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J.: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
Ghiselin, M.: 1974, ‘sA Radical Solution to the Species Problem’, Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.
Ghiselin, M.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity’, Biology and Philosophy 2, 127–143.
Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Chicago Press, Urbana.
Hull, D.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’, Annnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.
Mayr, E.: 1970, Populations, Species, and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mishler, B. and Donoghue, M.: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’, Systematic Zoology 31, 491–503.
Mishler, B. and Brandon, R.: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’, Biology and Philosophy 2, 37–54.
Peterson, H.: 1985, ‘The Recognition Concept of Species’, Transvaal Museum Monograph 4, 21–29.
Rosenberg, A.: 1985, The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Simpson, G.: 1961, The Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
van Valen, L.: 1976, ‘Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks’, Taxon 25, 233–239.
Williams, M.: 1985, ‘Species are Individuals: Theoretical Foundations for the Claim’, Philosophy of Science 52, 578–590.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author thanks Joel Cracraft, Brent Mishler and David Hull for commenting on earlier drafts of this paper, and Elliott Sober for his constant help and encouragement.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ereshefsky, M. Where's the species? Comments on the phylogenetic species concepts. Biol Philos 4, 89–96 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144045
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144045