Skip to main content
Log in

Commonplaces and argumentation in Cicero and Quintilian

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the contemporary revival of interest in topical invention among rhetoricians and informal logicians, the ‘commonplaces’ (loci communes) of classical rhetoric have received little attention. When considered at all, they are typically dismissed as sterile or mechanistic substitutes for genuine argumentative invention. A fresh examination of the texts of Cicero and Quintilian, however, suggests that these authors believe that the commonplaces have an important heuristic function, and an effort to understand this function is a matter of interest to contemporary students of argumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calboli Montefusco, L.: 1991, ‘Der Topik in der Argumentation’, in Gert Ueding (ed.), Rhetorik zwischen den Wissenschaften, Max Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, M.: 1990, The Book of Memory in Medieval Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, M.: 1993, ‘The Poet as Master Builder: Composition and Locational Memory in the iddle Ages’.Keynote address delivered at the conference ‘Memory and the Arts’, Newberry Library, Chicago, Il, May 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T.: 1949, De inventione. Trans. H. M. Hubbell. Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, E. P. J.: 1986, ‘The Topoi Revisited’, in J. Dietz Moss (ed.), Rhetoric and Praxis: The Contribution of Classical Rhetoric to Practical Reasoning, Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC, pp. 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T.: 1987, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, M. C.: 1983, ‘The Topics of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical Theory: From Cicero to Boethus’, Rhetorica 1, 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, D. J.: 1982, ‘Cicero's Topica: A Process View of Invention’, in R. McKerrow (ed.), Explorations in Rhetoric: Studies in Honor of Douglas Ebminger, Scott, Foresman, Glencoe Il, pp. 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and L. Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernot, L.: ‘Lieu et Lieu Commun dans la rhétorique antique’, Bulletin de la Association Guillaume Budé 198, 253–284.

  • Quintilian, M. F.: 1920, Institutio oratoia. Trans. H. E. Butler, 4 vols. Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leff, M. Commonplaces and argumentation in Cicero and Quintilian. Argumentation 10, 445–452 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142977

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142977

Key words

Navigation