Abstract
‘Geoengineering’ is a new term, still seeking a definition. It seems to imply something global, intentional, and unnatural. For the radiation balance, geoengineering may be fifty years in the future; today's means may be out of date then, and the future means are not yet known. It might immensely simplify greenhouse policy, transforming it from an exceedingly complicated regulatory regime to a problem in international cost sharing, a problem that we are familiar with. Putting things in the stratosphere or in orbit can probably be done by ‘exo-national’ programs, not depending on the behavior of populations, not requiring national regulations or incentives, not dependent on universal participation. It will involve merely deciding what to do, how much to do, and who is to pay for it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Academy of Sciences: 1992, Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base, Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 433–464.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schelling, T.C. The economic diplomacy of geoengineering. Climatic Change 33, 303–307 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142578
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142578