Abstract
In this paper we reconsider the basic model of “efficient rent seeking.” We stress the importance of the shape of the players' reaction curve in order to understand the impact of the technology of rent-seeking on the structure of the outcome of the game. We give a complete characterization of the pure strategy equilibria. Moreover, the possibility of preemption by a Stakelberg leader is discussed according to the nature of the technology of rent-seeking available to the agents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cairns, R.D. (1989). Dynamic rent-seeking. Journal of Public Economics 39: 315–334.
Corcoran, W.J. (1984). Long-run equilibrium and total expenditures in rent-seeking. Public Choice 43: 89–94.
Corcoran, W.J. and Karels, G.V. (1985). Rent-seeking behavior in the long-run. Public Choice 43: 227–246.
Hillman, A.L. (1988). The political economy of protection. Murray Kemp: University of New South Wales, Australia.
Hillman, A.L. and Samet, D. (1987a). Dissipation of contestable rents by small numbers of contenders. Public Choice 54: 63–82.
Hillman, A.L. and Samet, D (1987b). Characterizing equilibrium rent-seeking behavior: A reply to Tullock. Public Choice 54: 85–87.
Paul, C. and Wilhite, A. (1990). Efficient rent-seeking under varying cost structures. Public Choice 64: 279–290.
Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent-seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison and G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a Theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M Press.
Tullock, G. (1984). Long-run equilibrium and total expenditures in rent-seeking: Comment. Public Choice 43: 95–97.
Tullock, G. (1985). Back to the bog. Public Choice 46: 256–263.
Tullock, G. (1987). Another part of the swamp. Public Choice 54: 83–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank an anonymous referee for his useful comments
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez-Castrillo, J.D., Verdier, T. A general analysis of rent-seeking games. Public Choice 73, 335–350 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140926
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140926