Abstract
Measuring housing quality has continued to be an elusive task. This article proposes a new social indicator of housing quality that builds on three conceptual decisions. The first step is to define an indicator that measures quality with reference to a standard that households are striving to attain. Single-family homeownership is a standard of housing sought by nine-tenths of Americans under age 45. A second decision is to measure quality not according to absolute attainment of this standard, but rather with reference to the aggregate experience of progress toward attaining the standard. Under this experiential definition, quality is assumed to be high when the average individual moves quickly toward homeownership. The third conceptual decision is to aggregate individuals' progress toward homeownership by measuring the trajectory of cohorts into homeownership. The indicator of housing progress is thus a vector of age-specific ownership rates. Twentieth-century cohorts are compared on this indicator and the implication of differences among them are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baer, William C. (1976). “The evolution of housing indicators and housing standards”, Public Policy 24: 361–393.
Birch, David, et al. (1973). America's Housing Needs: 1970 to 1980. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies.
Budding, David W. (1978). “Draft Report on Housing Deprivation Among Enrollees in the Housing Allowance Demand Experiment.” Cambridge, Mass.: Abt Associates.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse and William L. Rodgers (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Campbell, Burnham O. (1966). Population Change and Building Cycles. University of Illinois, Urbana: Bureau of Economic and Business Research.
Cantril, Hadley (1965). The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Cantril, Albert H. and Charles, W. Roll Jr. (1971). Hopes and Fears of the American People. New York: Universe Books.
Diamond, Douglas, B., Jr. (1980). “The next housing crisis”, Real Estate Review 10: 65–71.
Dillman, Don A., Kenneth R. Tremblay, and Joyce J. Dillman (1979). “Influence of housing norms and personal characteristics on stated housing preferences”, Housing and Society 6: 2–19.
Douglas Commission (1969). Building the American City. Report of the National Commission on Urban Problems. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Fischer, Claude (1976). The Urban Experience. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Follain, James R., Jr., Jane Katz and Raymond J. Struyk (1978). “Programmatic options to encourage homeownership”, Occasional Papers in Housing and Community Affairs 2: 1–133.
Follain, James R., Jr. and Raymond J. Struyk (1979). “Is the American Dream really threatened?” Real Estate Review 8: 65–70.
Frieden, Bernard J. (1977). “The new housing-cost problem”, The Public Interest 49: 70–86.
Frieden, Bernard J., Arthur, P. Solomon, David L. Birch, and John Pitkin (1977). The Nation's Housing: 1975 to 1985. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies.
Goedert, Jeanne E. and John L. Goodman, Jr. (1977). Indicators of the Quality of U.S. Housing. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.
Goodman, John (1978). “Causes and indicators of housing quality”, Social Indicators Research 5: 195–210.
Holleb, Doris B. (1978). “A decent home and suitable living environment”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 435: 102–116.
Katona, George, Burkhard Strumpel, and E. Zahn (1971). Aspirations and Affluence: Comparative Studies in the United States and Western Europe. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Land, Kenneth C. (1975). “Social indicator models: an overview”, in Kenneth C. Land and Seymour Spilerman (eds.), Social Indicator Models. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lansing, John B. (1966). Residential Location and Urban Mobility: The Second Wave of Interviews. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
Marcuse, Peter (1971). “Social indicators and housing policy”, Urban Affairs Quarterly 7: 193–217.
Morris, Earl W. and Mary Winter (1978). Housing, Family, and Society. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Myers, Dowell (1978). “Aging of population and housing: a new perspective on planning for more balanced metropolitan growth”, Growth and Change 9: 8–13.
Myers, Dowell (1980). “The Housing Progress of Young Cohorts”, dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Myers, Dowell (1981). “Housing progress in the seventies: new indicators”, Social Indicators Research 9: 35–60.
Noto, Nonna (1980). “Tax and financial policies for owner-occupied housing in the 1980s”, in Roger Montgomery and Dale Rogers Marshall (eds.), Housing Policy for the 1980s. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.
Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade (1976). “The Easterlin hypothesis: another aspect of the echo to consider”, Population and Development Review 2: 433–457.
Pitkin, John and George Masnick (1980). Projections of Housing Consumption in the U.S., 1980–2000, by a Cohort Method. Annual Housing Survey Studies No. 9, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Rainwater, Lee (1974). What Money Buys: Inequality and the Social Meaning of Income. New York: Basic Books.
Ryder, Norman B. (1965). “The cohort as a concept in the study of social change”, American Sociological Review 30: 843–861.
Ryder, Norman B. (1972). “Notes on the concept of a population”, in Matilda White Riley, Marilyn Johnson and Anne Foner (eds.), Aging and Society: A Sociology of Age Stratification. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Strumpel, Burkhard (1973). “Economic life-styles, values and subjective behavior—an empirical approach”, in Eleanor B. Sheldon (ed.), Family Economic Behavior. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
Struyk, Raymond J. (1977). Should Government Encourage Homeownership? Washington D.C.: Urban Institute.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1943). Census of Population and Housing, Families: General Characteristics, Table 12. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1962). 1960 Census of Housing, “Metropolitan housing”, Vol. 2: 1, U.S. States and Divisions, Tables A-1, 2, and 3. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1967). Measuring the Quality of Housing: An Appraisal of the Census Statistics and Methods. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1972). 1970 Census of Housing “Space utilization of the inventory”, HC (7)-3, Table A-5. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975a–1979a). Current Housing Reports, H-150–73A-77A, Part A, “General housing characteristics”, Table A-1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975b). Historical Statistics of the United States, Part 1, Series A 143–157. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1977b). Current Housing Reports, H-150–75F, Part F, “Financial characteristics of indicators of housing and neighborhood quality”. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1977c). Current Population Reports, P-20, No. 311. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1977d). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1975, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1977e). Current Population Reports, P-20, No. 305, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1978b). Current population Reports, P-25, No. 721, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1979b). Current Housing Reports, H-150–77D, Part D, “Housing characteristics of recent movers”, Table A-1, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1979c). Current Housing reports, H-150–77C, Part C, “Financial characteristics of the housing inventory”, Table A-1, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Congressional Budget Office (1977). Homeownership: The Changing Relationship of Costs and Incomes, and Possible Federal Roles. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce (1977). Social Indicators 1976. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1974). Housing in the Seventies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1979). The 1978 HUD Survey of the Quality of Community Life. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. President's Committee on Urban Housing (1968). A Decent Home. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Waring, Joan M. (1975). “Social replenishment and social change: the problem of disordered cohort flow”, American Behavioral Scientist 19: 237–256.
Weicher, John C. (1977). “The affordability of new homes”, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 5: 209–226.
Weicher, John C. (1978). “New home affordability, equity and housing market behavior”, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 6: 395–416.
Winsborough, Halliman H. (1978). “Statistical histories of the life cycle of birth cohorts: the transition from schoolboy to adult male”, in Karl E. Taeuber, Larry L. Bumpass and James A. Sweet (eds.), Social Demography. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research underlying this article was supported by a Charles Abrams Fellowship awarded by the MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies. This article is a revision of a paper presented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington D.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myers, D. A cohort-based indicator of housing progress. Popul Res Policy Rev 1, 109–136 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138439
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138439