Skip to main content
Log in

Looking beyond reelection: Revising assumptions about the factors motivating congressional behavior

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper challenges the assumption inherent in most models of legislative behavior — namely that congressmen are driven by the desire for reelection. I offer an alternative perspective: incumbents seek to maximize their discretionary investments and the income generated by the job. The only constraint on this behavior is that legislators provide a satisfactory level of constituency service — a product that I suggest entails slight opportunity, and few manufacturing, costs for congressmen, and one that is unlikely to lose its value with increased production. I also demonstrate that increases in salary and discretionary investments have lengthened congressional careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidson, R. (1969). The role of the congressman. New York: Pegasus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R.S. (1972). Malapportionment, gerrymandering, and party fortunes in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 66 (December): 1234–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R.F. (1978). Home style. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A. and Calvert, R.L. (1984). Presidential coattails in historical perspective. American Journal of Political Science 28 (February): 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M.P. (1977). Congress: Keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garand, J.C. and Gross, D.A. (1984). Changes in the vote margins for congressional candidates: A specification of historical trends. American Political Science Review 78 (March): 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J.D. and Stroup, R. (1983). Economics: Private and public choice. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, J.R. (1980). The distribution of casework in the U.S. Congress: An uneven burden. Legislative Studies Quarterly 5 (November): 517–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B. and Rubin, P.H. (1979). Self-interest, ideology, and logrolling in congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 21 (October): 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, B.A. (1984). Congressional careers and party leadership in the contemporary House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science 28 (February): 180–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R. (1964). The economic theory of "managerial" capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, F.S. (1987). Rent extraction and rent creation in the economic theory of regulation. Journal of Legal Studies 16 (January): 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R.E. and Tollison, R.D. (1981). Politicians, legislation, and the economy. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D.R. (1974a). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D.R. (1974b). Congressional elections: The case of the vanishing marginals. Polity 6 (Spring): 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18 (December): 617–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, N.J. (1975). Causes and consequences of congressional change: Subcommittee reforms in the House of Representatives, 1970–73. In N.J. Ornstein (Ed.), Congress in change, 88–114. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.R. (1986). Homeward bound: Explaining changes in congressional behavior. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.R. (1989). Characteristics of Congress: Patterns in congressional behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.R. and Davidson, R.H. (1979). Why do Americans love their congressmen so much more than their Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 (February): 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (August): 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 27 (April): 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1985). An economic interpretation of the history of congressional voting in the twentieth century. American Economic Review 75 (September): 656–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N.W. (1968). The institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 62 (March): 144–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, H.D. (1975). Congress and the evolution of legislative "professionalism". In N.J. Ornstein (Ed.), Congress in change, 2–23. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, W.F. and Tollison, R.D. (1985). The cyclical character of regulatory activity. Public Choice 45: 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics (Spring): 3–21.

  • Tufte, E.R. (1973). The relationship between seats and votes in two-party systems. American Political Science Review 67 (June): 540–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R. and Marshall, W.J. (1988). The industrial organization of Congress; or, why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets. Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westefield, L.P. (1974). Majority party leadership and the committee system in the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 68 (December): 1593–1604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to acknowledge the advice and comments of Morris Fiorina, Kenneth Shepsle, James Gwartney, and Randy Holcombe. None of these scholars, however, bear any responsibility for the interpretations presented in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, G.R. Looking beyond reelection: Revising assumptions about the factors motivating congressional behavior. Public Choice 63, 237–252 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138164

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138164

Keywords

Navigation