Abstract
The complexity of the policy process is such that analysts often resort to metaphorical representations of its most salient aspects. Sometimes these metaphors are used deliberately but, in most cases, they are implicitly built into their theoretical frameworks. This article argues that commonly used metaphors based on the paradigmatic notion of ‘control’ have ceased to be relevant to the analysis of contemporary policy dilemmas. Two new conceptions of the policy process have emerged from the new sciences of complexity. Both chaos theory and models based on the concept of ‘organizational closure’ clearly reveal the self-organizing logic inherent in the problems confronting managers and policy-makers today. The main focus here is on examining the rationales for, and the potentials of, metaphors derived from these paradigmatic innovations - innovations which can be situated within an emerging postmodern culture insofar as they emphasize indeterminacy and the role played by social actors in constructing the social situations in which they find themselves. It is also argued, however, that within very specific contexts the notion of control may still be valid.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, Peter M. (1981). ‘Urban evolution, self-organization, and decision-making,’ Environment and Planning 13: 167–183.
Allen, Peter M. (1982). ‘Self-organization in the urban system,’ in W. C. Schieve and P. M. Allen, eds. Self-Organization and Dissipative Structures: Applications in the Physical and Social Sciences. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 132–158.
Allen, Peter M. (1988). ‘Evolution, innovation and economics,’ in G. Dosi et al., eds. Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 95–119.
Allen, P. M. and J. McGlade (1986). ‘Dynamics of discovery and exploitation: The case of the Scotian Shelf fisheries,’ Canadian Journal Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43: 1187–1200.
Argyros, Alexander J. (1991). A Blessed Rage for Order: Deconstruction, Evolution, and Chaos. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Bayley, Peter (1985). Social Control and Political Change. Research Monograph no. 49. Princeton: Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs, Princeton University.
Baumol, W. J. and J. Benhabib (1989). ‘Chaos: Significance, mechanism, and economic applications,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 77–105.
Beer, Stafford (1959). Cybernetics and Management. New York: John Wiley.
Beer, Stafford (1966). Decision and Control. New York: John Wiley.
Beer, Stafford (1980). ‘Preface’ to H. Matuarana and F. Varela. Autopoiesis and Cognition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Beer, Stafford (1981). Brain of the Firm, New York: John Wiley, 2nd ed. (1st ed., 1972).
Berman, Bruce J. (1990). ‘Perfecting the machine: Instrumental rationality and the bureaucratic ideologies of the state,’ World Futures 28: 141–161.
Bobrow, D. B. and J. S. Dryzek (1987). Policy Analysis by Design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Boyer, R., B. Chavance and O. Godard (1991). ‘La dialectique réversibilité-irréversibilité: une mise en perspective,’ in R. Boyer et al., eds. Les figures de l'irréversibilité en économie. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, pp. 11–33.
Brace, Paul and Gary Mucciaroni (1990). ‘The American states and the shifting locus of positive economic intervention,’ Policy Studies Review 10: 151–173.
Braten, Stein (1986). ‘The third position: Beyond artificial and autopoietic reduction’ in F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen, eds. Sociocybernetic Paradoxes. London: Sage, pp. 193–205.
Brewer, Garry D. (1975). ‘Analysis of complex systems: An experiment and its implications for policy making,’ in T. R. LaPorte, ed. Organized Social Complexity: Challenge to Politics and Policy. Princeton University Press, pp. 175–219.
Brock, William A. (1988). ‘Nonlinearity and complex dynamics in economics and finance,’ in Anderson, P. W. et al., eds. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Red Woods City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 77–98.
Brock, W. A. and E. G. Baek (1991). ‘Some theory of statistical inference for nonlinear science,’ The Review of Economic Studies 58: 697–716.
Broekstra, Gerrit (1991a). ‘Consistency, configuration, closure, and change,’ in R. J. in'tVeld, ed. Steering, Autopoiesis, Configuration. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 113–124.
Broekstra, Gerrit (1991b). ‘Organizational closure and the quantum view of organizations,’ in M. C. Jackson et al., eds. Systems Thinking in Europe. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 145–150.
Buchanan, James M. and Viktor J. Vanberg (1991). ‘The market as a creative process,’ Economics and Philosophy 7: 167–234.
Checkland, Peter B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Churchman, C. West (1968). The Systems Approach. New York: Delacorte Press.
Churchman, C.W., R. L. Ackoff, and E. L. Arnoff (1957). Introduction to Operations Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Cleland, David I. and William King (1968). Systems Analysis and Project Management. New York: McGraw-Hil.
Clemson, Barry (1984). Cybernetics: A New Management Tool. Tunbridge Wells: Abacus Press.
Coyle, R. Geoff (1978). Management Systems Dynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Crozier, M. and E. Friedberg (1980). Actors and Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Daneke, Gregory A. (1985). ‘Reassessing attempts to reform environmental regulation,’ in G. A. Daneke and D. J. Lemak, eds. Regulatory Reform Reconsidered. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 83–96.
deGreene, Kenyon B. (1973). Sociotechnical Systems: Factors in Analysis, Design, and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
diZerega, Gus (1989). ‘Democracy as a spontaneous order,’ Critical Review 3 (2): 206–240.
Dell, Paul F. (1982). ‘Beyond homeostatis: Toward a concept of coherence,’ Family Process 21 (1): 21–41.
Deutsch, Karl W. (1966). The Nerves of Government, 2d ed. New York: Free Press.
Dobuzinskis, Laurent (1987). The Self-Organizing Polity: An Epistemological Analysis of Policy Life. Boulder: Westview Press.
Dosi, G. and S. Metcalfe (1991). ‘Approaches de l'irréversibilité en théorie économique,’ in R. Boyer et al., eds. Les figures de l'irréversibilité en économie. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, pp. 37–68.
Dryzek, John S. (1989). ‘Policy sciences of democracy,’ Polity 22: 97–118.
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre (1989). ‘Autonomy of social reality: On the contribution of the theory of systems to the theory of society,’ World Futures 27: 153–175.
Dupuy, J.-P. and F. Varela (1992). ‘Understanding origins: An introduction,’ in F. Varela and J.-P. Dupuy, eds. Understanding Origins. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–25.
Dyke, C. (1988). The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Systems: A Study in Biosocial Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Etzioni, Amitai (1968). The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York: Free Press.
Fay, Brian (1976). Social Theory and Political Practice. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Feldman, Martha S. (1989). Order Without Design: Information Production and Policy Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Flood, Robert L. (1990). Liberating Systems Theory. New York: Plenum Press.
Forester, John (1989). Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Forrester, Jay W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forrester, Jay W. (1968). Principles of Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gao S.-J. and F. J. Charlwood (1991). ‘Systems evolution in modern systems research and a formal model for evolving systems,’ in M. C. Jackson, et al., eds. Systems Thinking in Europe. New York: Plenum, pp. 139–144.
Geyer, F. and J. van der Zouwen (1986). ‘Introduction,’ in F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen, eds. Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Conservation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems. London: Sage, pp. 1–9.
Glanville, Ranulph (1987). ‘The question of cybernetics,’ Cybernetics and Systems 18: 99–112.
Gleick, James (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking.
Goldwin, Robert A. (1980), ed. Bureaucrats, Policy Analysts, Statesmen: Who leads? Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Gregware, P. and R. M. Kelly (1990). ‘Relativity and quantum logic: A relational view of policy inquiry,’ in S. S. Nagel, ed. Policy Theory and Policy Evaluation. New York: Greenwood Press.
Hawkesworth, Mary E. (1988). Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1, Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1979). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 3, The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1982). ‘The new confusion about “planning,”’ in E. F. Paul and P. A. Russo, Jr., eds. Public Policy: Issues, Analysis, and Ideology. Chatam, NJ: Chatam House.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit. London: Routledge.
Heelan, Patrick A. (1983). ‘Natural science as a hermeneutics of interpretation,’ Philosophy of Science 50: 181–204.
Healy, Paul (1986). ‘Interpretive policy inquiry: A response to the limitations of the received view,’ Policy Sciences 19: 381–396.
Heller, Thomas (1988). ‘Accounting for law,’ in G. Teubner, ed. Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 283–311.
Holland, J. H. (1988). ‘The global economy as an adaptive process,’ in Anderson, P. W. et al., eds. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Red Woods City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 117–124.
Hovey, Harold A. (1968). The Planning Programming Budgeting Approach to Government Decision-Making. New York: Praeger.
Hughes, Jonathan R. T. (1991). The Governmental Habit Redux: Economic Controls from Colonial Times to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jackson, M. C. (1991). ‘Five commitments of critical systems thinking,’ in M. C. Jackson et al., eds. Systems Thinking in Europe. New York: Plenum, pp. 61–72.
Jennings, Bruce (1983). ‘Interpretive social science and policy analysis,’ in D. Callahan and B. Jennings, eds., Ethics, the Social Sciences, and Policy Analysis. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 3–35.
Jennings, Bruce (1987). ‘Interpretation and the practice of policy analysis,’ in F. Fisher and J. Forester, eds. Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 128–152.
Kelly, Rita M. (1986). ‘Trends in the logic of policy inquiry: A comparison of approaches and a commentary,’ Policy Studies Review 5: 520–528.
Kiel, L. Douglas (1991). ‘Lessons from the nonlinear paradigm: applications of the theory of dissipative structures in the social sciences,’ Social Science Quarterly 72: 431–442.
Laszlo, Ervin (1987). Evolution: The Grand Synthesis. Boston: Shambala.
Lavoie, Don (1989). ‘Economic chaos or spontaneous order? Implications for political economy of the new view of science,’ Cato Journal 8: 613–635.
Lemak, David J. (1985). ‘Social regulation: A swing of the pendulum,’ in G. A. Daneke and D. J. Lemak, eds. Regulatory Reform Reconsidered. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 39–53.
Lindblom Charles E. (1977). Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.
Lindblom, Charles E. (1990). Inquiry and Change: The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (1990). Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
McPhail, Clark (1991). The Myth of the Madding Crowd. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Majone, Giandomenico (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Maruyama, Magoroh (1968). ‘The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes,’ in W. Buckley, ed. Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 304–313.
Masuch, Michael (1986). ‘The planning paradox,’ in F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen, eds. Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Conservation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems. London: Sage, pp. 63–72.
Maturana, Humberto R. (1988). ‘The notions of cybernetics,’ Continuing the Conversation 13: 7.
Maturana, Humberto R. and Francisco J. Varela (1987). The Tree of Knowledge. Boston: Shambala.
Maynard-Moody, S. and D. S. Stull (1987). ‘The symbolic side of policy analysis: Interpreting policy change in a health department,’ in F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 248–265.
Miller, G. A., E. Gallanter and K. Pribram (1960). Plans and Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
Mirovski, Philip (1990). ‘From Mandelbrot to chaos in economic theory,’ Southern Economic Journal 57: 289–356.
Morgan, Gareth (1986). Images of Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.
Nicolis, G. and I. Prigogine (1989). Exploring Complexity: An Introduction. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
Overman, E. Sam (1991). ‘Policy physics,’ in T. L. Becker, ed. Quantum Politics: Applying Quantum Theory to Political Phenomena. New York: Praeger, pp. 151–168.
Pal, Leslie (1990). ‘Knowledge, power and policy: Reflections on Foucault,’ in S. Brooks and A.-G. Gagnon, eds. Social Scientists, Policy, and the State. New York: Praeger, pp. 139–158.
Pattee, Howard H. (1973). ‘Preface’ to H. H. Pattee, ed. Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. New York: George Braziller.
Powers, William T. (1973). Behavior: The Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine.
Powers, William T. (1989). Living Control Systems. Gravel Switch, KY: Control System Group.
Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers (1984). Order out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books.
Probst, G. J. B. (1984). ‘Cybernetics principles for the design, control, and development of social systems and some afterthoughts,’ in H. Ulrich and G. J. B. Probst, eds. Self-Organization and Management of Social Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 127–131.
Pullen, Glendon (1988). ‘Spontaneous order in open systems: The contribution of Ilya Prigogine and Friedrich Hayek.’ A paper presented to the Society for the Study of Public Choice.
Quade, E. S. (1982). Analysis for Public Decisions. New York: North Holland, 2nd ed.
Quade, E. S. and Boucher, W. I. eds. (1968). Systems Analysis and Policy Planning: Aplications in Defense. New York: Elsevier.
Ramo, Simon (1969). Cure for Chaos: Fresh Solutions to Social Problems Through the Systems Approach. New York: David McKay.
Richardson, George P. (1991). Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Schön, Donald A. (1971). Beyond the Stable State. New York: Random House.
Schön, Donald A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Singleton, W. T. (1974). Man-Machine Systems. Penguin Books.
Steier, Frederick (1988). ‘On cybernetic as reflexive understanding,’ Continuing the Conversation 12: 7–8.
Teubner, Gunther (1983). ‘Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law,’ Law and Society Review 17: 239–258.
Teubner, Gunther, ed. (1988). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Throgmorton, J. A. (1991). ‘Rhetorics of policy analysis,’ Policy Sciences 24:153–179.
Torgerson, Douglas (1986). ‘Interpretive policy inquiry: A response to its limitations,’ Policy Sciences 19: 397–405.
Varela, Francisco (1979). Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: North Holland.
Vickers, Geoffrey (1965). The Art of Judgement. London: Chapman & Hall.
Vickers, Geoffrey (1983). Human Systems are Different. New York: Harper & Row.
Weinrib, Ernest J. (1988). ‘Legal formalism: On the immanent rationality of law,’ The Yale Law Journal 97: 949–1016.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1973). ‘If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing,’ Policy Sciences 4: 127–153.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Wilson, Brian (1990). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed.
Yates, F. Eugene (1987). ‘Quantumstuff and biostuff: A view of patterns of convergence in contemporary science,’ in F. E. Yates, ed. Self-Organizing Systems: The Emergence of Order. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 643–649.
Zolo, Daniel (1990). ‘Autopoiesis: Critique of a postmodern paradigm,’ Telos 86: 61–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to thank Michael Howlett for his helpful comments on an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dobuzinskis, L. Modernist and postmodernist metaphors of the policy process: Control and stability vs. chaos and reflexive understanding. Policy Sci 25, 355–380 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138019
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138019