Abstract
In a series of major papers culminating in A Theory of Justice,Footnote 1 John Rawls constructs an alternative to utilitarianism by developing a social contract theory of moral and political philosophy. Unfortunately, Rawls formulates the two basic principles upon which the theory rests in such a way as to restrict (unduly) the contract theory's applicability (see Section I). In this paper we present a more general discussion of the theory of justice that avoids the problems of Rawls' formulation and yet retains the important idea of justice as fairness and the contractarian approach (Section II). Later it is argued that this more general theory constitutes a bridge between the pure utilitarian theories and the social contract doctrines (Sections V and VI). The theory's advantages are demonstrated by applying it to a problem discussed by Rawls, intergenerational equity, and comparing the two solutions (Section III). Further comparisons are made and inferences drawn in the concluding three sections.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971. Future page references to the book are placed in parentheses. Some of Rawls' basic ideas were set forth earlier in his ‘Justice as Fairness’, The Philosophical Review 57 (1958) 164–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Without implicating them, we would like to thank James M. Buchanan and David Lyons for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mueller, D.C., Tollison, R.D. & Willett, T.D. The utilitarian contract: A generalization of Rawls' theory of justice. Theor Decis 4, 345–367 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136654
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136654