Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The decision rules yielded respectively by the Rawlsian ‘maximin’ conception of justice and by classical utilitarianism are compared and contrasted. The discussion is based on the assumption of a pure distribution problem and sharp differences are brought out. An axiomatic analysis of the two conceptions is undertaken, the result of which is that Rawls and utilitarianism both omit essential aspects of distributional welfare judgments: Rawls leaves out questions of welfare differences, utilitarianism leaves out questions of welfare levels. It is possible to pay attention to the ranking of welfare levels without concentrating exclusively on the welfare levels of worst off persons only, thereby departing from both Bentham and Rawls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Dasgupta, P., Sen, A. K., and Starrett, D., ‘Notes on the Measurement of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 6 (1973).

  • Harsanyi, J., ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy 63 (1955).

  • Kolm, S. Ch., ‘The Optimal Production of Social Justice’, in J. Margolis and H. Guitton (eds.), Public Economics, Macmillan and St. Martin's Press, 1969.

  • Pattanaik, P. K., Voting and Collective Choice, Cambridge University Press, 1971.

  • Rawls, J., ‘Justice as Fairness’, Philosophical Review, 67 (1958).

  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Harvard U. Press and Clarendon Press, 1971.

  • Sen, A. K., Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day and Oliver and Boyd, 1970.

  • Sen, A. K., On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press and Norton, 1973.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London School of Economics, London, UK

    Amartya Sen

Authors
  1. Amartya Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I have benefited from the comments of Partha Dasgupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sen, A. Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem. Theor Decis 4, 301–309 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136651

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136651

Keywords

Search

Navigation