Abstract
This article describes three models which give insight into the factors that promote or inhibit change in institutions of higher education: a structural model; a social model; and a personal model. Although each offers a distinctive perspective, a number of recurrent themes are identified where the models support and complement one another. The usefulness of the three models in practice is illustrated by analysing how they might help in a possible innovation - the rapid expansion of Continuing Education in a traditional university.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, Learning and Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Becher, T. and Kogan, M. (1980). Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Heinemann.
Berg, B. and Ostergren, B. (1977). Innovations and Innovation Processes in Higher Education. Stockholm: National Board of Universities and Colleges.
Berg, B. and Ostergren, B. (1979). “Innovation processes in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education 4: 261–268.
Boud, D. and McDonald, R. (1981). Educational Development through Consultancy. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Clark, B. R. (1983). “The contradictions of change in academic systems,” Higher Education 12: 101–116.
Cohen, M. D. and March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Davies, J. L. and Morgan, A. W. (1982). “The politics of institutional change,” in L. Wagner (ed.), Agenda for Institutional Change in Higher Education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education, pp. 153–188.
Ellstrom, P-E. (1983). “Four faces of educational organisations,” Higher Education 12: 231–241.
Fleming, W. and Rutherford, R. J. D. (1984). “Recommendations for learning: rhetoric and reaction,” Studies in Higher Education 9: 17–26.
Havelock, R. G. (1973). The Change Agent's Guide to Innovation in Education. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Productions.
Heller, J. F. (1982). Increasing Faculty and Administrative Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Hewton, E. (1982). Rethinking Educational Change: A Case for Diplomacy. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Lindquist, J. (1978). Strategies for Change. Berkeley, California: Pacific Soundings Press.
Mathias, H. S. and Rutherford, R. J. D. (1983). “Decisive factors affecting change: a case study,” Studies in Higher Education 8: 45–55.
Rutherford, R. J. D. (1982). “Developing university teaching: a strategy for revitalisation,” Higher Education 11: 177–191.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rutherford, D., Fleming, W. & Mathias, H. Strategies for change in higher education: Three political models. High Educ 14, 433–445 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136515
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136515