Skip to main content
Log in

Subject disciplines and student evaluation of a degree programme in education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to report the evaluation of a degree programme in Education by final year undergraduate students of a university. The results show that arts and science students rated the courses, instruction and instructors in the education department significantly higher than those in their teaching subject departments; social science students rated their subject departments higher than the education department; the physical and health education students were indifferent in their ratings of both departments. The study further reveals that educational administration, educational psychology and guidance and counselling were rated in descending order as the most interesting courses in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleamoni, L. A. (1974). “The Usefulness of Student Evaluations in Improving College Teaching.” Office of Instructional Research and Development, University of Arizona.

  • Arubayi, E. A. (1980). “The University of Benin B.Ed. degree programme as perceived by students,”Journal of Nigerian Educational Research Association 1: 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejar, I. I. (1975). “A Survey of Selected Administrative Practices Supporting Student Evaluation of Instructional Programmes,”Research in Higher Education 3: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. and Rose, B. (1976). “Student point of view in ratings of college instruction,”Research Bulletin, (February). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F. et al. (1971). “Student ratings of college teaching: reliability, validity and usefulness,”Review of Educational Research 41: 511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. O. (1975).Student Evaluation of Instruction. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, I. L. (1960). “Evaluation of instruction” in Proceedings of Summer Institute on Effective Teaching for Young Engineering Teachers, at the Pennsylvania State University, Lancaster.

  • Drucker, A. J. and Remmers, H. A. (1951). “Do alumni and students differ in their attitudes towards instructors?,”Journal of Educational Psychology 42: 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eble, Kenneth, E. (1971).The Recognition and Evaluation of Teaching. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, P. W. (1973). “Student ratings of teaching: validity of several rating factors,”Science 1982: 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G. (1975).Toward Faculty Renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. L. (1974). “Students' rating of college teaching: their justification and proper use” in N. S. Glassman and B. R. Killait (eds.),Second UCSB Conference on Effective Teaching, pp. 72–86.

  • Goldschmid, M. L. (1978). “The evaluation and improvement of teaching in higher education,”Higher Education 7: 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, M. and Wilson, R. C. (1970).Effective University Teaching and its Evaluation. Berkeley: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., and Rubin, P. H. (1972). “Measurement techniques, grades and ratings of instructors,”Journal of Economic Education 4: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. I. (1972).Evaluating Faculty Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. I. (1975). “Faculty Evaluation and Development.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Heidelberg, 9–11, May.

  • Mirus, R. (1973). “Some implications of student evaluations of teachers,”Journal of Economic Education 5: 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. and Soper, J. C. (1972). “Economic man in the classroom,”Journal of Political Economy 80: 1069–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norr, J. L. and Crittenden, K. S. (1975). “Evaluating college teaching as leadership,”Higher Education 4: 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Bannion, T. (1976). “Staff development: a new priority for the seventies,”The College Board Review 99.

  • Perlberg, A. (1979). “Evaluation of instruction in higher education: some critical issues,”Higher Education 8: 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. W. (1977) “Grades, learning, and student evaluation of instruction,”Research in Higher Education 7: 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1979). “Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment,”Higher Education 8: 411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratz, H. C. (1975). “Factors in the evaluation of instructors by students,”Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Transactions on Education. New York, E-18, pp. 122#x2013;127.

  • Rich, H. E. (1976). “Attitudes of college and university faculty toward the use of student evaluation,”Educational Research Quarterly 3: 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (1975). “Correlates of student ratings of professorial performance: instructor defined extenuating circumstances, class, size, and faculty member's professional experience and willigness to publish results,” in Scott et al. (eds.),Professorial Assessment in Higher Education. Monmouth, OR: Teaching Research Division, Oregon State Systems of Higher Eduation, pp. 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, F. (1976). “New rating names for professors,”The Peabody Journal of Education 53: 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, E. F., (ed.) (1974).Teaching in the Universities: No One Way. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I. D. (1980). “Student assessment of tertiary teachers,”Vestes 23: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R. E., and Aleamoni, L. M. (1970). “A student course evaluation questionnaire,”Journal of Educational Measurement 7: 209–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arubayi, E. Subject disciplines and student evaluation of a degree programme in education. High Educ 14, 683–691 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136505

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136505

Keywords

Navigation