Skip to main content
Log in

On the axiomatisation of subjective probabilities

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper essentially makes two remarks that are pertinent to many of the axiomatisations of subjective probability. First, the auxiliary experiment used to quantify qualitative feelings of relative likelihood is essentially distinct from the field of events of actual interest and may be kept so in the axiomatisation. Second, all theories of subjective probability agree that beliefs are conditional on the present state of knowledge and on the present mood and attitude of the individual concerned. As the individual moves through time this conditioning set, his knowledge and psychological state, change. This ever present change has implications for the conditions under which Bayes' Theorem may be invoked to prescribe how the individual should rationally update his beliefs in the light of a particular observation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De Finetti, B.: 1974, ‘Theory of Probability’, Vol. 1 (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, M. H.: 1970, ‘Optimal Statistical Decisions’, (McGraw Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P.' 1968, ‘A Generalisation of Bayesian Inference’, J. Royal Statistical Society B 30, 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T.: 1973, ‘Theories of Probability’, (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S.: 1979, ‘Some Comments on Conditional Expected Utility plus Yet Another Axiomatisation of Subjective Expected Utility’, Notes in Decision Theory No. 79, (Department of Decision Theory, University of Manchester).

  • French, S.: 1980, ‘Updating of Belief in the Light of Someone Else's Opinion’, J. Royal Statistical Society A 143, 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J., Moore, P. G., and Thomas, H.: 1973, ‘Subjective Probability and its Measurement’, J Royal Statistical Society A 136, 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstein, I. N. and Milnor, J.: 1953, ‘An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utiluty’, Econometrica 21, 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, H;: 1961, ‘Theory of Probability’, 3rd edn. (Oxford University Press).

  • Krantz, D. H., Luce, E. D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A.: 1971, ‘Foundations of Measurement’, Vol. 1 (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V., Tversky, A., and Brown, R.: 1979, ‘On the Reconciliation of Probability Assessments’, J. Royal Statistical Society A 142, 146–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and Krantz, D. H.: 1971, ‘Conditional Expected Utility’, Econometrica 39, 253–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. N., Raiffa, H., and Schlaifer, R.: 1964, ‘The Foundations of Decision under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition’, J. American Statistical Association 59, 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J.: 1972, The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd edn. (Dover, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Villigas, C.: 1964, ‘On Qualitative Probability σ-Algebras’, Ann. Mathematical Statistics 35, 1787–1796.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

French, S. On the axiomatisation of subjective probabilities. Theor Decis 14, 19–33 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135142

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135142

Keywords

Navigation