Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of risk attitude, uncertainty and disequilibria on optimal production and inventory

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The empirical facts seem to indicate that in “real economies” the effect of uncertainty tends to decrease production. The limitations of empirical investigations presented should be stressed: they were performed mainly on an aggregate level, they mainly refer to Austrian manufacturing, they rely heavily on questionnaires. Above all empirical investigation will never be able to decide normative questions or to explain the behavior in the general equilibrium. Nevertheless in the short run, given all the rigidities and disequilibria which exist, uncertainty tends to lower optimal production even in absence of risk aversion. Risk aversion becomes important for large, for once-for-all decisions, but it is not the only channel through which uncertainty changes decisions.

“Technological concavity” created by concave marginal revenues or by convex marginal costs, marginal costs of uncertainty in disequilibria model or asymmetric costs of revisions of the preliminary decision are able to bias the decision downward in a real world economy without invoking

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Aiginger, K.: 1977, ‘The Use of Survey Data for the Analysis of Business Cycles’, CIRET-Study, No. 24, Munich.

  • Aiginger, K.: 1981, ‘Empirical Evidence on the Rational Expectations Hypothesis’, Empirica 1, 25–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K.: 1983, ‘Die Wirkung von asymmetrischen Verlusten auf die Bildung von rationalen ökonomischen Erwartungen’, IFO-Studien 29.

  • Aiginger, K.: 1985, ‘Unsicherheitstheorie und die unternehmerische Produktionsent-scheidung’, Campus, Frankfurt, New York 1985 (1985A).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K.: 1985, ‘Errors and Omissions in the Treatment of Backlogged Orders in Management Science Literature’, WIFO-Working Papers 10 (1985B).

  • Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H.: 1983, ‘Price Smoothing and Inventory’, Review of Economic Studies 50, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J.: 1978, ‘The Future and the Present in Economic Life’, Economic Inquiry 16, 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P.: 1970, ‘Price Uncertainty, Utility, and Industry Equilibrium in Pure Competition’, International Economic Review 11, 463–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassy, J. P.: 1982, The Economics of Market Disequilibrium, Academic Press, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S.: 1982, ‘Inventories and Sticky Prices: More on the Microfoundation of Macroeconomics’, Americal Economic Review 72(3), 334–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, J. and Koenigsberg, E.: 1982, Scientific Inventory Management, Prentice Hall.

  • Costrell, R. M., ‘Profitability and Aggregate Investment under Demand Uncertainty’, EJ 93(1), 166–181.

  • Cyert, R. and March, J.: 1963, Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs.

  • De Groot, M.: 1970, Optimal Statistical Decisions, New York.

  • Hartman, R.: 1975, ‘Competitive Firm and the Theory of Input Demand under Price Uncertainty’, Journal of Political Economy 83.

  • Hay, G. A.: 1971, ‘Production, Price and Inventory Theory’, American Economic Review 60, 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, G. A.: 1972, ‘The Dynamics of Firm Behavior under Alternative Cost Structures’, AER 62(3), 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. A. and Morris, D. J.: 1979, Industrial Economics, Oxford.

  • Hey, J. D.: 1979, Uncertainty in Microeconomics, Oxford.

  • Hey, J. D.: 1981, Economics in Disequilibrium, Oxford.

  • Hillier, F. D. and Lieberman, A. J.: 1980, Introduction into Operations Research, San Francisco.

  • Holt, C., Modigliani, F., Muth, J. and Simon, H.: 1960, Planning Production, Inventories and Work Force, Englewood Cliffs, New York.

  • Hymans, S. H.: 1966, ‘The Price Taker: Uncertainty, Utility, and the Supply Functions’, International Economic Review 7, 346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. A. and Montgomery, D. C.: 1974, Operations Research and Production Planning, Scheduling and Inventory Control, New York.

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’, Em. 47(2), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H.: 1921, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston.

  • Kraus, M.: 1979, ‘A Comparative Statics Theorem for Choice Under Risk’, Journal of Economic Theory 21(3), 510–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kon, Y.: 1983, ‘Capital Input Choice under Price Uncertainty: A Putty-Clay Technology Case’, International Economic Review 24(1), 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. E.: 1972, ‘Theory of the Firm Facing Uncertain Demand’, American Economic Review 62, 278–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S. A. and McCall, J. J.: 1981, The Economics of Uncertainty: Selected Topics and Probablistic Methods, in K. J. Arrow and M. D. Intriligator (eds.), Vol. 1, pp. 211–284.

  • Loomes, G. and Sugdan, R.: 1982, Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty. EJ 92(4), 805–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E.: 1980, Profitability and Unemployment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, J. F.: 1961, ‘Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements’, Econometrica 29, 315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. J.: 1978, The Investment Decisions of Firms, Oxford.

  • Petersen, R. and Silver, E. A.: 1979, Decision Systems for Inventory Management and Production Planning, New York.

  • Radner, R.: 1975, ‘Satisficing’, Journal of Mathematical Economics 2, 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, K. W.: 1981, Einführung in die Ungleichgewichtstheorie, Heidelberger Taschenbücher, Band 212, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J. E.: 1970, ‘Increasing Risk: 1. A Definition, 2. Its Economic Consequences’, Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225–243, resp. 3, 1971, 66–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S.: 1956, ‘Uncertainty in Economics and other Reflections’, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1978, ‘Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 68, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky, S. J.: 1973, ‘Production Flexibility, Price Uncertainty and the Behavior of the Competitive Firm’, International Economic Review 14(2), 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veinott, A. F.: 1966, ‘The Status of Mathematical Inventory Theory’, Management Science 12, 745–777.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper presented to the 2nd Conference on the Foundations of Risk and Utility (FUR), Venezia, 1984.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiginger, K. The impact of risk attitude, uncertainty and disequilibria on optimal production and inventory. Theor Decis 19, 51–75 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134354

Keywords

Navigation