Skip to main content
Log in

Unification and morphological blocking

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper addresses the question of how ‘Avoid Pronoun’ and similar phenomena can be accommodated in LFG and other unification-based frameworks, considering primarily data from the synthetic vs. analytic verb-subject constructions in Modern Irish, but also data from other languages, including Spanish and English. The solution proposed is a constraint on lexical insertion, the ‘Morphological Blocking Principle’, which is essentially a variant of the Elsewhere Condition, modified to control lexical insertion in LFG. The principle says that if, in a complete sentence structure (comprising both c-structure and f-structure), a lexical item L appears in a c-structure position P corresponding to an f-structure F, and there is another lexical item L' whose specifications are subsumed by those of L but subsume those of F, then the structure is blocked. The principle depends crucially on the use of unification rather than movement to relate the contents of distinct syntactic positions. Discussion is also provided of how the blocking relation can be computed with a reasonable degree of efficiency.

I am also indebted to the UMass Amherst linguistics department for providing hospitality and support while some of this work was being done, and also to the Outside Studies Program of the Australian National University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Stephen R.: 1969, West Scandinavian Vowel Systems and the Ordering of Phonological Rules, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen R.: 1977, ‘On the Formal Description of Inflection’, in W. A. Beach, S. E. Fox and S. Philosoph (eds.), Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 15–44.

  • Anderson, Stephen R.: 1982, ‘Where's Morphology?’ Linguistic Inquiry 13, 571–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen R.: 1984, ‘On Representations in Morphology: Case Marking, Agreement and Inversion in Georgian’, NLLT 2, 157–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen R.: 1986, ‘Disjunctive Ordering in Inflectional Morphology’, NLLT 4, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Avery D.: 1984, ‘Lexical Insertion and the Elsewhere Principle in LFG’, ms., The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark C.: 1988, Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, Michael and C.A. Ferguson (eds.): 1988, Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan W.: 1982a, ‘The Passive in Lexical Theory’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), pp. 3–86.

  • Bresnan, Joan W. (ed.): 1982b, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Sam A. Mchombo: 1987, ‘Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chicheŵa’, Language 63, 741–782. Also in M. Iida, S. Wechsler and D. Zec (eds.) (1986), Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Lioba Moshi: 1990, ‘Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 147–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bhaldraithe, Tomás: 1953, Gailge Chois Fhairrge: An Deilbhíocht, Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevi, Marco: 1964, Rosaura a las diez, Scribner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Myles and Donncha Ó Cróinín: 1961, Teach Yourself Irish, English Universities Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams: 1987, On the Definition of Word, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doron, Edit: 1988, ‘On the Complementarity of Subject and Subject-Verb Agreement’, in M. Barlow and C. Ferguson (eds.), pp. 201–218.

  • Falk, Yehuda N.: 1984, ‘The English Auxiliary System’, Language 60, 483–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, Erica C.: 1975, The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis: the Spanish Pronoun System, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, Talmy: 1976, ‘Topic, Pronoun and Grammatical Agreement’, in C. Li (ed.), pp. 149–188.

  • Givón, Talmy (ed.): 1979, Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1982, ‘On the Lexical Representation of Romance Reflexive Clitics’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), pp. 87–148.

  • Halle, Morris: 1973, ‘Prolegomena to a Theory of Word-Formation’, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris and K. P. Mohanan: 1985, ‘Segmental Phonology of Modern English’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 57–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo: 1982, Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo: 1986, ‘Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics: Case, Doubled NPs, and Extraction’, in H. Borer (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, Richard N. and María Sandoval: 1984, Elsewhere in Morphology, distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

  • Jensen, John T. and Margaret Stong-Jensen: 1984, ‘Morphology is in the Lexicon’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 474–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Ronald M. and Joan W. Bresnan: 1982, ‘Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), pp. 173–281.

  • Kiparsky, Paul: 1973, ‘Elsewhere in Phonology’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul: 1983, ‘Word-Formation and the Lexicon’, in F. Ingemann (ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, Lawrence.

  • Koster, Jan: 1987, Domains and Dynasties: the Radical Autonomy of Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoudas, A., G. Sanders and C. Noll: 1974, ‘On the Application of Phonological Rules’, Language 50, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, Stephen: 1980, A Theory of Grammatical Agreement, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Charles N. (ed.): 1976, Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle: 1979, On the Organization of the Lexicon, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Distributed in 1981 by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

  • Marantz, Alec P.: 1984, On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Peter M.: 1972, Inflectional Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James: 1986, ‘Inflection and Conjunction in Modern Irish’, NLLT 4, 245–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, James and Kenneth L. Hale: 1984, ‘On The Syntax of Person-Number Inflection in Modern Irish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 487–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan, K. P.: 1982, Lexical Phonology, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • Mohanan, K. P. and Tara Mohanan: 1984, ‘Lexical Phonology of the Consonant System in Malayalam’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 575–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalbetti, Mario: 1981, ‘Consistency and Clitics’, ms., MIT.

  • Montalbetti, Mario: undated, ‘A Study in Doubling’, ms., MIT.

  • Morin, Yves-Charles: 1988, ‘Disjunctive Ordering and French Morphology’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidle, Carol: 1982a, The Role of Case in Russian Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Neidle, Carol: 1982b, ‘Case Agreement in Russian’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), pp. 391–426.

  • Ó Sé, Diarmuid: 1983, Gaeilge Chorca Dhuibhne: An Fhoneolaiocht agus an Deilbhíoct, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Siadhail, Micheál: 1980, Learning Irish, Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David M.: 1971, Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1979, ‘Russian Morphology and Lexical Theory’, ms., MIT.

  • Pesetsky, David: 1985, ‘Morphology and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 193–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven: 1984, Language Learnability and Language Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pranka, Paula M.: 1983, Syntax and Word-Formation, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Rice, Keren: 1985, ‘On the Placement of Inflection’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Linda: 1988, ‘Asymmetric Feature Distribution in Pronominal “Coordinations”’, in M. Barlow and C. Ferguson (eds.), pp. 237–249.

  • Selkirk, Elizabeth O.: 1982, The Syntax of Words, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, Stuart M.: 1986, An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoestedt-Jonval, M. L.: 1938, Description d'un Parlais Irlandais, Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabler, Eric: 1988, ‘Parsing with Explicit Representations by Syntactic Constraint’, in V. Dahl and P. Saint-Dizier (eds.), Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming II, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suñer, Margarita: 1988, ‘The Role of Agreement in Clitic-Doubled Constructions’, NLLT 6, 391–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Flinders, Tracy (ed.): 1981, Inflectional Morphology: Introduction to the Extended Word-and-Paradigm Theory, UCLA occasional papers #4, Working Papers in Morphology, Los Angeles.

  • Thomas-Flinders, Tracy (ed.): 1982, ‘On the Notions “Head of a Word” and “Lexically Related”: Evidence from Maricopa Verbal Morphology’, in D. Flickinger, M. Macken and N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Linguistics Dept., Stanford University, pp. 168–178.

  • Wald, Benjamin: 1979, ‘The Development of the Swahili Object Marker: A Study of the Interaction of Syntax and Discourse’, in T. Givón (ed.), pp. 505–524.

  • Williams, Edwin S.: 1981, ‘On the Notions “Lexically Related” and “Head of a Word”’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would most like to thank Jim McCloskey, for a great deal of assistance with Irish, and Judith Aissen, for making many suggestions which have hopefully improved the intelligibility of this paper. I am also indebted to Joan Bresnan, Frank Heny, Sam Bayer and various anonymous reviewers for useful comments and criticisms of various versions of this paper, and to Edwin Williams for discussions of the subject-matter. All blunders are of course my own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, A.D. Unification and morphological blocking. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 8, 507–557 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133692

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133692

Keywords

Navigation