Skip to main content
Log in

World-wide variation inDrosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

InDrosophila melanogaster, male wing vibration, a key element of courtship behaviour, is most efficiently induced by a female-specific contact pheromonecis, cis 7,11 heptacosadiene (7, 11 HD), which is the main mature female cuticular hydrocarbon in the CS laboratory strain. A study of 63 strains from around the world revealed that flies from Sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean are unique in showing low levels 7,11 HD and high levels of the position isomer 5,9 HD. This difference maps to chromosome III, perhaps indicating a simple genetic control of the 7,11 HD: 5,9 HD ratio. Females from strains with high levels of 7,11 HD showed higher levels of mating and mated more rapidly than females with low levels of 7,11 HD. The results are discussed in light of recent discoveries of genetic differences betweenD. melanogaster strains from Africa and those from elsewhere around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antony, C. & J.-M. Jallon, 1982. The chemical basis for sex recognition inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 28: 873–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony, C., T. L. Davis, D. A. Carlson, J.-M. Péchiné & J.-M. Jallon, 1985. Compared behavioral responses of maleDrosophila melanogaster (Canton S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiaes. J. Chem. Ecol. 11: 1617–1629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner, M., 1989.Drosophila: A laboratory handbook. (Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S. J. & M. B. Sokolowski, 1985. A genetic analysis of path length and pupation height in a natural population ofDrosophila melanogaster. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 27: 334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begun, D. J. & C. F. Aquadro, 1993. African and North American population ofDrosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 364: 548–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, M. J., G. Thomas, H. Hendriks & W. van Velden, 1984. A reexamination of the negative assortative mating phenomenon and its underlying mechanism inDrosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 14: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, M. & J.-M. Jallon, 1990. Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in theDrosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Anim. Behav. 39: 1058–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, M., B. Burnet & K. Connolly, 1988. Sexual isolation and courtship behavior inDrosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, and their interspecific hybrids. Behav. Genet. 18: 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, M., B. Burnet, R. Blizard & J.-M. Jallon, 1990. Altered mating behavior in a Carsonian population ofDrosophila sechellia. Evolution 44: 2057–2068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohet, Y. & J. R. David, 1980. Geographic divergence and sexual behaviour: Comparison of mating systems in French and Afrotropical populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Genetica 54: 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, K., B. Burnet, M. Kearny & L. Eastwood, 1974. Mating speed and courtship behaviour of inbred strains ofDrosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 48: 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, A. J., A. P. Crittenden & K. Mah, 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation inDrosophila. Science 265: 1461–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J. R. & P. Capy, 1988. Genetic variation ofDrosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet 4: 106–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, L. & B. Burnet 1977. Courtship latency in maleDrosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 7: 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A., 1983. Functional aspects ofDrosophila courtship. Biol. Rev. 58: 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferveur, J.-F., 1991. Genetic control of pheromones inDrosophila simulans. I. Ngbo, a locus on the second chromosome. Genetics 128: 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, L. V. & A. R. Templeton, 1983. Behavioral phylogenies and the direction of evolution. Science 220: 372–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, N. R. & D. M. Lambert, 1982. No significant deviation from random mating of world-wide populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Nature 300: 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J.-M., 1984. A few chemical words exchanged byDrosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14: 441–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J.-M. & J.-M. Péchiné, 1989. Une autre race chimique deDrosophila melanogaster en Afrique. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 309: 1551–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, K. Y., 1976. Ethological isolation and phyologeny in theplanitibia subgroup of HawalanDrosophila. Evolution30: 740–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klun, J. A. & M. D. Huettel, 1988. Genetic regulation of sex pheromone production and response interaction of sympatric pheromonal types of European corn borer,Ostriana nubilatis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 14: 2047–2061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, Ch. P. & J. C. Hall, 1984. Learning and memory mutations impair acoustic priming of mating behaviour inDrosophila. Nature 308, 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemeunier, F., J. R. David, L. Tsacas & M. Ashburner, 1986. Themelanogaster species group. In Genetics and Biology of Drosophila (Vol. 3E) (eds M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson & J. N. Thompson) pp. 147–256. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löefstedt, C., B. S. Hansson, W. Roelfs & B. O. Bengtsson, 1989. No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn borner,Ostrinia nubilalis Hûbner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Genetics 123: 555–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luyten, I., 1982. Variations intraspécifique et interspécifique des hydrocarbures cuticulaires chezDrosophila simulans et des espèces affines. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 295: 733–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringo, J. M., H. N. Dowse & S. Lagasse, 1986. Symmetry versus asymmetry in sexual isolation experiments. Evolution 40: 1071–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schilcher, F., 1976. The rôle of auditory stimuli in the courtship ofDrosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 24: 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. S. & L. R. Rhomberg, 1987. A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. I. Estimation of gene flow from rare alleles. Genetics 115: 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toolson, E. C. & R. Kuper-Simbrón, 1989. Laboratory evolution of epicuticular hydrocarbon composition inD. pseudoobscura: effects on sexual dimorphism and thermal acclimation ability, Evolution 43: 468–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venard, R., Antony, C. & J.-M. Jallon, 1989.Drosophila chemoreceptors. In Neurobiology of Sensory Systems (eds N. Singh & N. J. Strausfeld) pp. 377–385. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T. K. & M. Kawanishi, 1979. Mating preference and the direction of evolution inDrosophila. Science 205: 906–907.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferveur, JF., Cobb, M., Boukella, H. et al. World-wide variation inDrosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences. Genetica 97, 73–80 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132583

Key words

Navigation