Skip to main content
Log in

A further experimental study of expressive voting

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Do people vote in elections for reasons that have nothing to do with the possibility that their own vote may decide the result of the election? That is, do they vote for “expressive” reasons? There is no hard evidence in the real world which bears on this question. The nearest one can come to an answer is to ask people about why they have voted, but what people say they do is not necessarily the same as their behavior, which cannot be observed on this issue in real voting situations. The existence, or otherwise, of expressive voting is an important question, because the answer provides insights into explaining voter turnout (i.e. to help explain why people vote), as well as whether their vote ever changes as a result of a change in the probability that their vote will decide-the election (i.e. to help explain what people vote).

By conducting an appropriate experiment, however, direct evidence of whether some people vote expressively may be obtained. This paper describes such an experiment, and gives clear evidence for the existence of expressive voting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, J.H. (1993). Rational choice and turn-out.American Journal of Political Science 37(February): 246–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (1975). A note on the probability of a tied election.Public Choice 23: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H.G. (1989). Politics with romance: Towards a theory of democratic socialism. In A. Hamlin and P. Pettit (Eds.),The good polity: Normative analysis of the State, 49–66. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H.G. and Buchanan, J. (1984). Voter choice: Evaluating political alternatives.American Behavioral Scientist 28(Nov/Dec): 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H.G. and Lomasky, L.E. (1985). The impartial spectator goes to Washington: Towards a Smithian theory of electoral behavior.Economics and Philosophy I(October): 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H.G. and Lomasky, L.E. (1987). The logic of electoral preference: Response to Saraydar and Hudelson.Economics and Philosophy 3(April): 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H.G. and Lomasky, L.E. (1993).Democracy and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H.G. and Pincus, J.J. (1989). Rational actor theory in politics: A critical review of John Quiggin.Economic Record 63(March): 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.R. and Guerette, S.D. (1992). An experimental study of expressive voting.Public Choice 73: 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain G. and Rothschild, M. (1981). The probability of casting a decisive vote.Journal of Economic Theory 25: 152–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. and Mayer, L.S. (1975). Estimating the efficacy of a vote.Behavioral Science 20(1): 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. (1988). Politics, ideology and the power of public choice.Virginia Law Review 74(March): 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomasky, L.E. (1985). Is social security politically untouchable?Cato Journal 5(Spring–Summer): 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, J., Kragt, A. van de and Dawes, R. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced co-operation.Journal of Personalilty and Social Psychology 54(5): 811–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967).Towards a mathematics of politics. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Univ. Mich. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1971). The charity of the uncharitable.Economic Inquiry 9(December): 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to acknowledge the useful comments made by Jonathan Pincus on the design of the experiment, and the helpful advice of an anonymous reviewer of this journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, A.J. A further experimental study of expressive voting. Public Choice 88, 171–184 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130417

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130417

Keywords

Navigation