Skip to main content
Log in

The public demand for smoking bans

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smoking bans are gaining widespread support in the United States and other countries. While supporters argue that bans are necessary to resolve market failures associated with negative externalities, the Coase Theorem predicts that, under various conditions, private markets internalize negative externalities. We examine the smoking issue within the framework of the Coase Theorem and hypothesize that smoking bans misallocate air space resources shared by smokers and nonsmokers. Because smoking bans shift ownership of scarce resources, they are also hypothesized to transfer income from one party (smokers) to another party (nonsmokers). Supporting evidence for these hypotheses is provided by an examination of a comprehensive smoking ban imposed in San Luis Obispo, CA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coase, R.A. (1960). The problem of social cost.Journal of Law and Economics 3(October): 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbury, L., Kerner, J.F., Baker, E., Botvin, G., James-Ortiz, S. and Zauber, A. (1992). Predictors of smoking prevalence among New York latino youth.American Journal of Public Health 82(January): 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. and Whitaker, A.H. (1992). Adolescent smoking, weight changes, and binge-purge behavior: Associations with secondary amenorrhea.American Journal of Public Health 82(January): 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility.Economic Journal 49(September): 549–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. (1991a). Government v. Coase: The case of smoking.The Cato Journal 11(Summer): 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. (1991b). Environmental economics and the social cost of smoking.Contemporary Policy Issues 9(January): 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewit, E.M., Coate, D. and Grossman, M. (1981). The effects of government regulation on teenage smoking.Journal of Law and Economics 24(December): 545–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, C.E. (1992).Health economics. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., Zwerling, C. and Orav, E.J. (1992). Occupational risks associated with cigarette smoking: A prospective study.American Journal of Public Health 82(January): 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R.D. and Wagner, R.E. (1992).The economics of smoking. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, R., McAlister, A. and Nostbakken, D. (Eds) (1982).A manual on smoking and children, Vol. 73. Geneva: UICC Technical Report Series.

  • Wasserman, J., Manning, W.G., Newhouse, J.P. and Winkler, J.D. (1991). The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking.Journal of Health Economics 10: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments of an anonymous referee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyes, W.J., Marlow, M.L. The public demand for smoking bans. Public Choice 88, 57–67 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130409

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130409

Keywords

Navigation