Skip to main content
Log in

Laissez-faire in campaign finance

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the impact of campaign contribution limits on government expenditures. The theory is based on the proclivity of geographic-based legislators to support wealth transfers from the polity at large to finance benefits for local constituents. It predicts that laissez-faire in contributions will lead to less government spending on budgetary redistribution and to a greater output of laws by the legislature. The theory is tested using data on U.S. State governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Council of State Governments. (1980). Book of the States, Vol. 23. Lexington, KY.

  • Easterbrook, F.H. (1983). Antitrust and the economics of federalism. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (April): 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glants, J., Abramowitz, A., and Burkhart, M. (1976). Election outcomes: Whose money matters? Journal of Politics 38: 1033–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. (1976). Practical consequences of campaign finance reform: An incumbent protection act? Public Policy 24 (Winter): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. (1978). The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 72: 469–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. (1980). Money in congressional elections. New Haven. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. (1985). Money and votes reconsidered: Congressional elections, 1972–1982. Public Choice 47: 7–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, C.E. (1967). Tax exporting in the United States: Estimates for 1962. National Tax Journal 20 (March): 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, M.T., McCormick, R.E., and Tollison, R.D. (1984). Economic regulation, competitive governments, and specialized resources. Journal of Law and Economics 27 (October): 329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1971). Pricing in public enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics 14 (October): 109–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (August): 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 27 (April): 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, J., and Yochua, G. (1978). The role of money in determining election outcomes. Social Science Quarterly 58: 671–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (1986). Do incumbent campaign expenditures matter? Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, UC Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W.P. (1981). Money and votes: A simultaneous equation model. Public Choice 36 (2): 209–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zardkoohi, A. (1977). The economics of public enterprise. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. VPI&SU, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Kevin Grier, James C. Miller III, William Miller, Dennis C. Mueller, and Scott Thomas for helpful discussions. The usual caveat applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crain, W.M., Tollison, R.D. & Leavens, D.R. Laissez-faire in campaign finance. Public Choice 56, 201–212 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130271

Keywords

Navigation