Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of corridor width and presence on the population dynamics of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus)

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the effects of increased landscape corridor width and corridor presence on the population dynamics and home range use of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) within a small-scale fragmented landscape. Our objective was to observe how populations behaved in patchy landscapes where the animals home range exceeded or equaled patch size. We used a small-scale replicated experiment consisting of three sets of two patches each, unconnected or interconnected by 1-m or 5-m wide-corridors, established in an old-field community (S.W. Ohio). Control (0-m) treatments supported significantly lower vole densities than either corridor treatment. Females were the dominant resident sex establishing smaller home ranges (<150m2) than males (>450m2). Significantly more male voles dispersed between patches with corridors than between patches without corridors. However, no difference was observed regarding the number of male voles dispersing between patches connected by corridors when compared to the number dispersing across treatments. Dispersal between connected patches was restricted to corridors based on tracking tube data. Corridor presence was more important than corridor width regarding the movement of male voles within their home range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batzli, G.O., Getz, L.L. and Hurley, S.S. 1977. Suppression of growth and reproduction of microtine rodents by social factors. J. Mammal. 58: 583–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, H.C. 1983. Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney, E.C., Grant, W.E. and Baird, D.D. 1976. Importance of vegetative cover to cycles of Microtus populations. Ecology 57: 1043–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, E.K., Harper, S.J., Kramer, J.M. and Barrett, G.W. 1991. Avoidance of inbreeding in the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). J. Mammal. 72: 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechner, M. 1987. Conservation in insular parks: Simulation models of factors affecting the movement of animals across park boundaries. Biol. Conserv. 41: 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechner, M. 1989. Are small-scale landscape features important factors for field studies of small mammal dispersal sinks? Landscape Ecology 2: 161–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, F.R. 1978. A movement barrier useful in population studies of small mammals. Am. Midl. Nat. 100: 480–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S.T. and Oring, L.W. 1977. Ecology, sex selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66: 1762–1768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Animal and plant movement across a landscape. In Landscape Ecology, pp. 357–395. Edited by R.T.T. Forman and M. Godron. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, L.L. 1960. A population study of the vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Am. Midl. Nat. 64: 392–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, L.L. 1985. Habitats. In Biology of New World Microtus. pp. 286–305. Edited by R.H. Tamarin. Am. Soc. Mammalogists Spec. Publ. No. 8.

  • Getz, L.L., Cole, F.R. and Gates, D.L. 1978. Use of interstate roadways as dispersal routes by Microtus pennsylvanicus. J. Mammal. 50: 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S.J. 1990. Effects of patch shape on the dispersal behavior and population dynamics of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). M.S. thesis. Miami University, Oxford, OH, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.D. 1985. Conservation corridors: A highway system for wildlife. ENFO report 85–5. Fla. Cons. Found., Winter Park, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.D. and Gallagher, P.B. 1989. New initiatives for wildlife conservation: The need for movement corridors. In In Defense of Wildlife: Preserving Communities and Corridors. pp. 11–34. Edited by G. Mackintosh. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasler, J.F. 1975. A review of reproduction and sexual maturation in the microtine rodents. The Biologist 57: 52–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henein, K. and Merriam, G. 1990. The elements of connectivity where corridor quality is variable. Landscape Ecology 4: 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M.T., Merriam, G. and Wegner, J. 1985. Patchy environments and species survival: Chipmunks in an agricultural mosaic. Biol. Conserv. 31: 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpimaki, E. and Norrdahl, K. 1991. Numerical and functional responses of kestrels, short-eared owls, and long-eared owls to vole densities. Ecology 72: 814–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C.J., Keller, B.L. and Tamarin, R.A. 1969. Microtus population biology: Demographic changes in fluctuating populations of M. ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus in southern Indiana. Ecology 50: 587–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkovitch, L.P. and Fahrig, L. 1985. Spatial characteristics of habitat patches and population survival. Ecol. Modelling 30: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, E.B. and Madden E.A. 1933. The point-contact method of pasture analysis. New Zealand J. Agric. 46: 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z. Jr. 1985. Dispersal. In Biology of New World Microtus. pp. 420–454. Edited by R.H. Tamarin. Am. Soc. Mammalogists Spec. Publ. No. 8.

  • Lorenz, G.C. and Barrett, G.W. 1990. Influence of simulated landscape corridors on house mouse (Mus musculus) dispersal. Am. Midl. Nat. 123: 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader, H.J. 1984. Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol. Conserv. 29: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D.M. 1980. Space use and social structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D.M. 1985. Activity rhythms and spacing. In Biology of New World Microtus. pp. 373–419. Edited by R.H. Tamarin. Am. Soc. Mammalogists Spec. Publ. No. 8.

  • McClave, J.T. and Dietrich II, F.H. 1985. Statistics. Dellen Publishing Co., San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, G., Kozakiewicz, M., Tsuchiya, E. and Hawley, K. 1989. Barriers as boundaries for metapopulations and demes of Peromyscus leucopus in farm landscapes. Landscape Ecology 2: 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. BioScience 33: 700–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, R.T. and Furman, T. 1959. Effect of vegetative cover of fence rows on small mammal populations. Ecology 40: 140–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfield, R.S., Pugh, S.R., Seamon, J.O. and Tamarin, R.H. 1988. Space use and reproductive success in a population of meadow voles. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O.P. 1966. The prey of carnivores during one cycle of mouse abundance. J. Anim. Ecol. 35: 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrusewicz, K. and R. Andrzejewski. 1962. Natural history of a free-living population of house mice (Mus musculus Linneus) with particular references to groupings within the population. Ecol. Pol. -Ser.A. 10: 85–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser, P.G. 1985. Toward a holistic management perspective. BioScience 35: 414–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser, P.G., Karr, J.R. and Forman R.T.T. 1984. Landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Ill. Nat. Surv. Spec. Publ. 2: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics. Version 5 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, J.A., Buechner, M. and Krishnan, V.V. 1987a. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. Amer. Nat. 129: 533–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, J.A., Buechner, M. and Krishnan, V.V. 1987b. The effects of habitat geometry on territorial defense costs: Intruder pressure in bounded populations. Am. Zool. 129: 533–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart, R.K. and Slade N.A. 1984. Road crossing in Sigmodon hispidus and Microtus ochrogaster. J. Mammal. 65: 357–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamarin, R.H. 1985. Biology of New World Microtus. Am. Soc. Mammalogists Spec. Publ. No. 8. 926 p.

  • VanVleck, D.B. 1969. Standardization of Microtus home range calculation. J. Mammal. 50: 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, L. and Getz, L.L. 1985. Significance of dispersal in fluctuating populations of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus. J. Mammal. 66: 338–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, J.F. and Merriam, G. 1979. Movement by birds and small mammals between a wood and adjoining farmland habitat. J. Appl. Ecol. 16: 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J.O. 1985. Behavior. In Biology of New World Microtus. pp. 374–415. Edited by R.H. Tamarin. Am. Soc. Mammalogists Spec. Publ. No. 8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

La Polla, V.N., Barrett, G.W. Effects of corridor width and presence on the population dynamics of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Landscape Ecol 8, 25–37 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129865

Keywords

Navigation