Skip to main content
Log in

Meaningfulness of a learning experience: A measure for educational outcomes in higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on assumptions derived from the humanistic education theory that (1) the learners' perceived meaningfulness of a learning experience is an important measure of the educational outcomes, and that (2) the learner is a legitimate evaluator of his own learnings, this study attempts to develop a conceptual model for the meaningfulness and value of a course of study as judged by students in higher education. The model suggests that in a course, perceived meaningfulness and value are related to the perceived learnings in the cognitive-subject matter, affective-personal, and behavioral domains.

A Course Valuing Inventory based on this model has been developed and tested on 141 students, participating in 19 university courses. Testing the Inventory showed that it is reliable, and that the relationship between the perceived learnings in the course and its value are as established by the conceptual model. It was also found that the tool successfully differentiates between graduate and undergraduate students, as has been hypothesized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleamoni, L. M. and Graham, M. H. (1974). “The relationship between CER ratings and instructor's rank, class size and course level,” Journal of Educational Measurement, 11: 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M. and Hexner, D. L. (1973). “The effects of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation,” Eric, ED: 081-405.

  • Anderson, G. J. (1970). “Effects of classroom social climate on individual learning,” American Educational Research Journal, 7, 2: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. R. and Magoon, Jr. (1972). “Expected grade in a course, grade point average and student rating of the course and the instructor,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32: 1013–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeler, K. C. (1973). “Student educational self inventory: establishing a rational.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Combs, A. W. and Snygg, D. (1959). Individual Behavior. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F., Greenough, W. T. and Menges, R. J. (1971). “Student rating of college teaching. Reliabilities, validities and usefulness,” Review of Educational Research, 41: 511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown, S. (1968). “Criteria for measurement of outcome in psychotherapy,” The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 41: 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S., Prager, R. and Bergin, A. (1971). “Evaluation of outcome in psychoherapy,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37: 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillmore, G. M. (1973). “Estimates of reliabilities coefficients for items and subscales of Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire,” Eric, ED: 082-656.

  • Horenstein, D., Houston, B. K. and Holmes, D. S. (1973). “Clients', therapists' and judges' evaluation of psychotherapy,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20: 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. A., Muller, J. J., Eisman, H. D., Knitzer, J., and Spilken, A. (1967). “The assessment of change in distress level and styles of adaptation as a function of psychotherapy,” Journal of Neurosis and Mental Disease, 145: 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1973). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston: Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunney, G. H. (1974). “Attitudes of senior students from a small liberal art college concerning faculty and course evaluation,” Eric, ED: 089-637.

  • McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. and Mann, W. (1971). “Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies,” American Educational Research Journal, 8: 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, R. et al. (1974). “Graduate students in counseling and guidance perception of a basic course in human relations,” Eric, ED: 083-490.

  • Meredith, G. M. (1969). Dimensions of faculty-course evaluation, Journal of Psychology, 73: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oles, H. J. (1974). “Stability of student evaluations of instructors and their courses.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, G. and Roark, A. A. (1974). Human Interaction in Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, W. F. (1973). “Increased accountability within the general framework of educational institutions through the utilization of the peer and self-evaluation checklist (PSEC),” Eric, ED: 084-234.

  • Walberg, H. J., House, E. R. and Steele, J. M. (1973). “Grade level, cognition and effects: A cross-section of classroom perceptions,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2: 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The study was supported in part by the Jewish Memorial Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nehari, M., Bender, H. Meaningfulness of a learning experience: A measure for educational outcomes in higher education. High Educ 7, 1–11 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129786

Keywords

Navigation