Abstract
Based on assumptions derived from the humanistic education theory that (1) the learners' perceived meaningfulness of a learning experience is an important measure of the educational outcomes, and that (2) the learner is a legitimate evaluator of his own learnings, this study attempts to develop a conceptual model for the meaningfulness and value of a course of study as judged by students in higher education. The model suggests that in a course, perceived meaningfulness and value are related to the perceived learnings in the cognitive-subject matter, affective-personal, and behavioral domains.
A Course Valuing Inventory based on this model has been developed and tested on 141 students, participating in 19 university courses. Testing the Inventory showed that it is reliable, and that the relationship between the perceived learnings in the course and its value are as established by the conceptual model. It was also found that the tool successfully differentiates between graduate and undergraduate students, as has been hypothesized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleamoni, L. M. and Graham, M. H. (1974). “The relationship between CER ratings and instructor's rank, class size and course level,” Journal of Educational Measurement, 11: 189–202.
Aleamoni, L. M. and Hexner, D. L. (1973). “The effects of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation,” Eric, ED: 081-405.
Anderson, G. J. (1970). “Effects of classroom social climate on individual learning,” American Educational Research Journal, 7, 2: 135–152.
Baker, B. R. and Magoon, Jr. (1972). “Expected grade in a course, grade point average and student rating of the course and the instructor,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32: 1013–1023.
Beeler, K. C. (1973). “Student educational self inventory: establishing a rational.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Combs, A. W. and Snygg, D. (1959). Individual Behavior. New York: Harper.
Costin, F., Greenough, W. T. and Menges, R. J. (1971). “Student rating of college teaching. Reliabilities, validities and usefulness,” Review of Educational Research, 41: 511–535.
Crown, S. (1968). “Criteria for measurement of outcome in psychotherapy,” The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 41: 31–38.
Garfield, S., Prager, R. and Bergin, A. (1971). “Evaluation of outcome in psychoherapy,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37: 307–313.
Gillmore, G. M. (1973). “Estimates of reliabilities coefficients for items and subscales of Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire,” Eric, ED: 082-656.
Horenstein, D., Houston, B. K. and Holmes, D. S. (1973). “Clients', therapists' and judges' evaluation of psychotherapy,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20: 149–153.
Jacobs, M. A., Muller, J. J., Eisman, H. D., Knitzer, J., and Spilken, A. (1967). “The assessment of change in distress level and styles of adaptation as a function of psychotherapy,” Journal of Neurosis and Mental Disease, 145: 392–404.
Knowles, M. (1973). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston: Gulf.
Lunney, G. H. (1974). “Attitudes of senior students from a small liberal art college concerning faculty and course evaluation,” Eric, ED: 089-637.
McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. and Mann, W. (1971). “Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies,” American Educational Research Journal, 8: 435–445.
McMullan, R. et al. (1974). “Graduate students in counseling and guidance perception of a basic course in human relations,” Eric, ED: 083-490.
Meredith, G. M. (1969). Dimensions of faculty-course evaluation, Journal of Psychology, 73: 27–32.
Oles, H. J. (1974). “Stability of student evaluations of instructors and their courses.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus: Merrill.
Stanford, G. and Roark, A. A. (1974). Human Interaction in Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stier, W. F. (1973). “Increased accountability within the general framework of educational institutions through the utilization of the peer and self-evaluation checklist (PSEC),” Eric, ED: 084-234.
Walberg, H. J., House, E. R. and Steele, J. M. (1973). “Grade level, cognition and effects: A cross-section of classroom perceptions,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2: 142–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The study was supported in part by the Jewish Memorial Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nehari, M., Bender, H. Meaningfulness of a learning experience: A measure for educational outcomes in higher education. High Educ 7, 1–11 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129786
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129786