Abstract
This paper arises from the experiences in five countries (Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom) in developing and using performance indicators in government-institutional relationships. The rôle of performance indicators in higher education depends on the political culture, the educational funding system and the quality assessment procedures that determine the optimal allocation of resources in a particular country. The political culture of education can be geared, on the one hand, to equivalence in the provision of educational opportunities and, on the other, to variety in the educational system. The funding system can be incremental or differential. Quality assessment can aim at quality across the system or at comparative quality judgements. Ten lessons for government and intermediate funding agencies are drawn, which are believed to facilitate the debate on the development and the use of indicators in government-institutional relations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bormans, M.J., Brouwer, R., In't Veld, R.J. and Mertens, F.J. (1987). ‘The rôle of performance indicators in improving the dialogue between government and universities’, International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 2, 181–184.
Cave, M., Hanney, S. and Kogan, M. (1991). The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (C.V.C.P.) (1986). Performance Indicators in Universities: A First Statement by a Joint C.V.C.P./U.G.C. Working Group. London.
C.V.C.P. and U.F.C. (1991). University Management Statistics and Performance Indicators in the U.K. London.
Dochy, F.J.R.C., Segers, M.S.R. and Wijnen, W.H.F.W. (eds.) (1990a). Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.
Dochy, F.J.R.C., Segers, M.S.R. and Wijnen, W.H.F.W. (eds.) (1990b). ‘Preliminaries to the implementation of a quality assurance system based on management information and performance indicators: Results of a validity study’, in Dochy et al., op. cit.Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education} 69–94.
In't Veld, R.J. and Spee, A.A.J. (1987). ‘Performance indicators in higher education in the Netherlands’. Paper presented at the O.E.C.D. International Conference on Education Indicators, Washington D.C.
Kells, H.R. (ed.) (1990). The Development of Performance Indicators for Higher Education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Neave, G. (1988). ‘On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986–1988’, European Journal of Education 23, 7–23.
Sizer, J. (1990a). ‘Performance indicators and the management of universities in the U.K.’, in Dochy et al., op. cit.Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education} 5–46.
Sizer, J. (1990b). ‘Funding councils and performance indicators in quality assessment in the United Kingdom’, in Geodegeburre, L.C.J., Maassen, P.A.M. and Westerdeijden, D.F. (eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators, Utrecht: Uitgeverij Lemma, pp. 155–181.
Spee, A. and Bormans, R. (eds.) (1991). Performance Indicators in Government-Institutional Relations. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Vroeijenstijn, A.I. (1991). ‘External Quality Assessment: Servant of Two Masters?’ Paper presented at the Conference Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Hong Kong.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to thank Marianne Bauer, Toril Johansson and Hugo von Linstow for their contributions from Sweden, Norway and Denmark.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sizer, J., Spee, A. & Bormans, R. The rôle of performance indicators in higher education. High Educ 24, 133–155 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129438
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129438