Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the effects of forest harvesting on landscape structure and the spatial distribution of cowbird brood parasitism

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Timber harvesting affects both composition and structure of the landscape and has important consequences for organisms using forest habitats. A timber harvest allocation model was constructed that allows the input of specific rules to allocate forest stands for clearcutting to generate landscape patterns reflecting the “look and feel” of managed landscapes. Various harvest strategies were simulated on four 237 km2 study areas in Indiana, USA. For each study area, the model was applied to simulate 80 years of management activity. The resulting landscape spatial patterns were quantified using a suite of landscape pattern metrics and plotted as a function of mean harvest size and total area of forest harvested per decade to produce response surfaces. When the mean clearcut size was 1 ha, the area of forest interior remaining on the landscape was dramatically reduced and the amount of forest edge on the landscape increased dramatically. The potential consequences of the patterns produced by the model were assessed for a generalized neotropical migrant forest bird using a GIS model that generates maps showing the spatial distribution of the relative vulnerability of forest birds to brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds. The model incorporates the location and relative quality of cowbird feeding sites, and the relation between parasitism rates and distance of forest from edge. The response surface relating mean harvest size and total area harvested to the mean value of vulnerability to cowbird brood parasitism had a shape similar to the response surfaces showing forest edge. The results of our study suggest that it is more difficult to maintain large contiguous blocks of undisturbed forest interior when harvests are small and dispersed, especially when producing high timber volumes is a management goal. The application of the cowbird model to landscapes managed under different strategies could help managers in deciding where harvest activity will produce the least negative impact on breeding forest birds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alverson, W.S., Waller, D.M. and Solheim, S.L. 1988. Forest too deer: edge effects in northern Wisconsin. Conserv. Biol. 2: 348–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andren, H. and Angelstam, P. 1988. Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence. Ecol. 69: 544–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askins, R.A., Philbrick, M.J. and Sugeno, D.S. 1987. Relationship between the regional abundance of forest and the composition of forest bird communities. Biol. Conserv. 39: 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittingham, M.C. and Temple, S.A. 1983. Have cowbirds caused forest songbirds to decline? BioScience 33: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, H.S., Hooper, R.G. and Titterington, R.W. 1981. Songbird population response to silvicultural practices in central Appalachian hardwoods. J. Wildl. Manage. 45: 680–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, T.R. 1989. Biological diversity and silvicultural systems. In Proceedings of the National Silviculture Workshop, Petersburg, Alaska. USDA Forest Service, Timber Management, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaSalla, D.A. and Rabe, D.L. 1987. Response of least flycatchers Empidonax minimus to forest disturbances. Biol. Conserv. 41: 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufty, A.M. Jr. 1982. Movements and activities of radio-tracked brown-headed cowbirds. Auk 9: 316–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J.F. and Forman, R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecol. 1: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark, K.E. 1988. Landscape ecology of forest birds in the northeast. In Healthy forests, healthy world: Proceedings of the 1988 Society of American Foresters National Convention, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, J.E. and Gysel, L.W. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field-forest ecotones. Ecol. 59: 871–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster, P.H. and Chenoweth, R.E. 1989. The dimensions of aesthetic preference: a quantitative analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 29: 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E.J. and Parker, G.R. 1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecol. 7: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E.J., Parker, G.R. and Backs, S.E. 1994. Evaluating spatial pattern of wildlife habitat: a case study of the Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Am. Midl. Nat. 131: 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J.R. 1982. Avian extinctions on Barro Colorado Island, Panama: a reassessment. Am. Nat. 119: 220–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma, R.L. 1984. Effect of edge on breeding forest bird species. Wilson Bull. 96: 426–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand, T.M. and Kiefer, R.W. 1987. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, J.M. and Norton, D.A. 1990. Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 4: 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D.E. and Booth, G.D. 1989. Responses of birds and small mammals to single-tree selection logging in Idaho. Res. Pap. INT-408. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmut, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 1: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S.M., Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H. and O'Neill, R.V. in press. An organism-based perspective of habitat fragmentation. In Biodiversity in managed landscapes: theory and practise. Edited by R.C. Szaro. Oxford University Press, Cary, NC.

  • Probst, J.R. and Crow, T.R. 1991. Integrating biological diversity and resource management. J. Forestry 89: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti, J.T. and Reese, K.P. 1988. Preliminary test of the ecological trap hypothesis. J. Wildl. Manage. 52: 484–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple, W.J., Bradshaw, G.A. and Spies, T.A. 1991. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biol. Conserv. 57: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.K. 1992. Population dynamics of breeding Neotropical migrants in a fragmented Illinois landscape. In Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. pp. 408–418. Edited by J.M. Hagen and D.W. Johnston. Manomet Bird Observatory, Manomet, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.K., Grzybowski, J.A., Rothstein, S.I., Brittingham, M.C., Petit, L.J. and Thompson, F.R. 1993. Management implications of cowbird parasitism on neotropical migrant songbirds. In Status and management of neotropical migratory birds, pp. 93–102. Edited by D.M. Finch and P.W. Stangel. Gen. Tech. Rep., RM-229, Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S.I., Verner, J. and Stevens, E. 1984. Radio-tracking confirms a unique diurnal pattern of spatial occurrence in the parasitic brown-headed cowbird. Ecol. 65: 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, H.W. and Daniel, T.C. 1981. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Forest Science 27: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M.F. and Hunter, M.L. 1988. Forest fragmentation and avian nest predation in forested landscapes. Oecologia 76: 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solheim, S.L., Alverson, W.S. and Waller, D.M. 1987. Maintaining biotic diversity in National Forests: the necessity for large blocks of mature forests. Endanged Species: Technical Bulletin Report 4:1–3, The School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. 1992. Perspectives on the conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. In Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. pp. 7–12. Edited by J.M. Hagen and D.W. Johnston. Manomet Bird Observatory, Manomet, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S.A. and Cary, J.R. 1988. Modeling dynamics of habitat-interior bird populations in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 2: 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F.R. III, Dijak, W.D., Kulowiec, T.G. and Hamilton, D.A. 1992. Breeding bird populations in Missouri Ozark forests with and without clearcutting. J. Wildl. Manage. 56: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F.R. III, Probst J.R. and Raphael, M.G. 1993. Silvicultural options for neotropical migratory birds. In Status and management of neotropical migratory birds, pp. 353–362. Edited by D.M. Finch and P.W. Stangel. Gen. Tech. Rep., RM-229, Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F.R. III 1993. Simulated responses of a forest interior bird population to forest management options in central hardwood forests of the United States. Conserv. Biol. 7: 325–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F.R. III. in press. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk.

  • Vinning, J. 1991. Environmental values, emotions, and public involvement. In Ecosystem management in a dynamic society, pp. 26–35. Edited by D.C. Le Master and G.R. Parker. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahner, R.H. and Scott, D.P. 1988. Effects of forest fragmentation on depredation of artificial nests. J. Wildl. Manage. 52: 158–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahner, R.H. and Wright, A.L. 1985. Depredation of artificial ground nests: effects of edge and plot age. J. Wildl. Manage. 49: 508–513.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gustafson, E.J., Crow, T.R. Modeling the effects of forest harvesting on landscape structure and the spatial distribution of cowbird brood parasitism. Landscape Ecol 9, 237–248 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129235

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129235

Keywords

Navigation