Skip to main content
Log in

Strict proportional power in voting bodies

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is a widely known fact among game theorists as well as political scientists that the distribution of voting weights in a voting body is generally a poor proxy for the distribution of voting power within the body. It has been proposed to equate the distribution of a priori voting power and actual seat distribution by randomizing the decision rule of the voting body over various majority rules. In this paper, some implications of this procedure will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banzhaf, J. F.: 1965, ‘Weighted Voting Doesn't Work: A Mathematical Analysis’, Rutgers Law Review 19, 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. and Holler, M. J.: 1984, ‘Randomized Decision Rules in Voting Games: A Model for Strict Proportional Power’ (unpublished manuscript).

  • Brams, S. J. and Affuso, P.: 1976, ‘Power and Size: A New Paradox’, Theory and Decision 7, 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P. and Shapley, L. S.: 1980, ‘Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index’, Mathematics of Operations Research 62, 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J.: 1982a, ‘An Introduction to the Analysis of Power, Voting, and Voting Power’, in M. J. Holler (ed.), Power, Voting and Voting Power, Physica, Würzburg, pp. 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J.: 1982b, ‘Forming Coalitions and Measuring Voting Power’, Political Studies 30, 262–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J.: 1984a, ‘A Public Good Power Index’ in M. J. Holler (ed.), Coalitions and Collective Action, Physica, Würzburg, pp. 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M. J.: 1984b, ‘Strict Proportional Power, Randomized Voting, and Political Implications’ (in preparation).

  • Holler, M. J. and Packel, E. W.: 1983, ‘Power, Luck, and the Right Index’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 43, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, M.: 1979, ‘Thresholds for Proportional Representation: Reanalyzed and Extended’, Munich Social Science Review 1, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R.: 1982, ‘Proportional Representation and Effective Number of Parties in Finland’, in M. J. Holler (ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power, Physica, Würzburg, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. and Gibbard, R. W.: 1977, ‘Thresholds and Payoffs in List Systems of Proportional Representation’, European Journal of Political Research 5, 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H.: 1980, ‘Game Theory and Power Indices’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 40, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packel, E. W. and Deegan, J. Jr.: 1982, ‘An Axiomatic Family of Power Indices for Simple n-Person Games’, Public Choice 35, 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. W., Handby, V. J. and Loosemore, J.: 1971, ‘Thresholds of Representation and Thresholds of Exclusion: An Analytical Note on Electoral Systems’, Comparative Political Studies 3, 479–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S.: 1968, ‘Elections: Electoral Systems’, in D. L. Sille (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Macmillan and Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S.: 1933, ‘A Value for n-Person Games’, in H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M.: 1954, ‘A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System’, American Science Review 48, 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P. D. Jr.: 1977, ‘Homogeneity, Independence, and Power Indices’, Public Choice 30, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.: 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holler, M.J. Strict proportional power in voting bodies. Theor Decis 19, 249–258 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126416

Keywords

Navigation