Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A framework for thinking about Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS)

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strategic problem solving in organizations is a social process that disturbs established social relationships. Maintaining a negotiated social order is crucial to political feasibility and to emotional commitment from the participants in relation to a solution package. However, Group Decision Support Systems that attend overly to managing social order risk “group think” through “bounded vision”. This may be avoided if emotional commitment is also encouraged through participants experiencing the problem situation from multiple perspectives and in relation to alternative solution strategies. Commitment depends upon both “means/ends rationality” and “procedural rationality”. This acknowledges the balance in providing support to a group with respect to the negotiation of social order, with the more traditional group decision support for socially negotiating order out of the problem situation. This article argues that effective Group Decision Support Systems must attend to both aspects of creating order. OR modelling methods and the support that can be provided by modern micro-computers offer a new way forward—models can be toys that a group can play with together, enabling them to create knowledge as well as use it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, F. (1989). “Incrementalism and Opportunism”, Working Paper 89-07, Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde.

  • Ackermann, F. (1991). “Considerations of a Specific GDS Methodology in the Light of the GDSS Literature”. PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

  • Ackermann, F., and Eden, C. (1991). “Issues in Computer and Non-computer Supported GDSSs”. Paper presented to IFORS conference on Decision Support Systems, Bruges, March.

  • Agor, W.H. (1989). Intuition in Organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, L.M., T.T. Chen, B. Konsynski, and J. Nunamaker. (1987). “Knowledge Management in Organizational Planning”. Journal of Management Information Systems 3, 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.I. (1938). The Function of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, T.J., G. Drauden, and J. Barsaloux. (1974). “Brainstorming Procedure, Group Size and Sex as Determinants of the Problem Solving Effectiveness of Groups and Individuals”. Journal of Applied Psychology 59, 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, T.J., and M. Hare. (1970). “Size, Performance and Potential in Brainstorming Groups”. Journal of Applied Psychology 54, 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G.D. (1981). “Where the Twain Meet: Reconciling Science and Politics in Analysis”. Policy Sciences, 269–279.

  • Brindle, D. (1991). “Meetings ‘Cost the NHS Too Much’”. Report on study by Leicester Polytechnic. Guardian, 15 April.

  • Bryson, J. (1988). “Strategic Planning and the Nature of Big Wins and Small Wins”. Public Money and Managemewnt, Autumn, 11–15.

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1989). “Soft Systems Methodology”. In J. Rosenhead (eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, J. (1990). “The Decision Process at the Centre of the Turnaround of a Financially Distressed Firm”. PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

  • Connolly, T., L.M. Jessup, and J.S. Valacich. (1990). “Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer Mediated Groups”. Management Science 36, 689–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1982). de Bono's Thinking Course. London: BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geus, A. (1988). “Planning as Learning”. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 70–74.

  • DeSanctis, G., and R.B. Gallupe. (1987). “A Foundation for Group Decision Support System Design”. Management Science 33, 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1983). “Review of ‘Creative Thinking and Brainstorming’”. Journal of Management Studies 20, 277–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1987). “Problem Solving or Problem Finishing?” In M.C. Jackson and P. Keys (eds.), New Directions in Management Science. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1992). “Strategic Management as a Social Process”. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 799–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1989). “Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA)”. In J. Rosenhead (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1990a). “Managing the Environment as a Means to Managing Complexity”. In C. Eden and J. Radford (eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1990b). “The Unfolding Nature of Group Decision Support”. In C. Eden and J. Radford (eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1991). “Increase of Competence via Shared Workspace?—A Response to de Zeeuw”. Presented at the ESRC Seminar on Problem Structuring and the Management of Complexity, February.

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (1992). “Strategy Development and Implementation—The Role of a Group Decision Support System and EIS”. In C. Holtham (ed) Executive Information Systems and Strategic Decision Support. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and G. Galer. (1990). “Strategic Thinking with Computers”. International Journal of Strategic Management 23, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., S. Jones, and D. Sims. (1983). Messing About in Problems. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., S. Jones, D. Sims, and T. Smithin. (1981). “The Intersubjectivity of Issues and Issues of Intersubjectivity”. Journal of Management Studies 18, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., T. Smithin, and H. Williams. (1986). “Synthetic Wisdom: The Design of a Mixed Mode Modelling System for Organizational Decision Making”. Journal of the Operational Research Society 37, 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.S., and J.G. March. (1981). “Information in Organisations as Signal and Symbol”. Administrative Science Quarterly 26, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. (1989). “the Strategic Choice Approach”. In J. Rosenhead (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J.K. (1991). “New Directions in Software for Strategic Choice”. Paper presented to IFORS conference on Decision Support Systems, Bruges, March.

  • Friend, J., and A. Hickling. (1987). Planning Under Pressure. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat, K.S., and R.D. Duke. (1981). Principles and Practices of Gaming Simulation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, J., and J. Rohrbaugh. (1990). “Social Judgement Analysis and Small Group Decision Making: Cognitive Feedback Effects on Individual and Collective Performance”. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 46, 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. (1988). “The Abilene Paradox: The Management of Agreement”. Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 17–34.

  • Hickling, A. (1990). “Decision Spaces”. In C. Eden and J. Radford (eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G.W. (1982). “Group Versus Individual Performance: Are N+1 Heads Better Than One?” Psychological Bulletin 91, 517–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L.R. (1965). “Group Problem Solving”. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Psychology, Vol. 2, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1989). “The CONAN Play: A Case Study Illustrating the Process of Metagame Analysis”. In J. Rosenhead (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. (1984). “Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems”. MIS Quarterly 8, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. (1990). “On Trivialities in Process”. In C. Eden and J. Radford (eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (1990). “Social Theory and Operational Research Practice”. Paper presented to ESRC Seminar Series on Operational Research and the Management of Complexity, London, October.

  • James, J. (1951). “A Preliminary Study of the Size Determinant in Small Group Interaction”. American Sociological Review 16, 474–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I., and Mann. (1977). Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, L.M., T. Connelly, and J. Galegher. (1990). “The Effects of Anonymity on Group Process in Automated Group Problem Solving”. MIS Quarterly 14, 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflict. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losada, M., P. Sanchez, and E.E. Noble. (1990) “Collaborative Technology and Group Process Feedback: Their Impact on Interactive Sequences in Meetings”. CSCW 90 Proceedings, October.

  • Lyles, M.A., and I.I. Mitroff. (1980). “Organizational Problem Formulation: An Empirical Study”. Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangham, I.L. (1977). “Definitions, Interactions and Disengagement: Notes Towards a Theory of Intervention Processes in T-Groups”. Journal of Small Group Behaviour 8, 487–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft, J. (1990). “Strategy Support Models”. In R.G. Dyson (ed.), Strategic Planning: Models and Analytical Techniques. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C.J. (1986). “Differential Contributions of Majority and Minority Influence”. Psychological Review 93, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote Parkinson, C. (1957). Parkinson's Law. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P.C. (1984). “Types of Organizational Decision Processes”. Administrative Science Quarterly 29, 414–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.D. (1984). “A Theory of Requisite Decision Models”. Acta Psychologica 56, 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.D. (1990). “Decision Analysis for Group Decision Support”. In C. Eden and J. Radford (eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlinson, G. (1981). Creative Thinking and Brainstorming. Farnborough, Hants: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. (1987). The Strategic Management Forum: From Vision to Strategy to Operating Policies and Back Again. New Hampshire: High Performance Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1989). “Diverse Unity: The Principles and Prospects for Problem Structuring Methods”. In J. Rosenhead (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C.R. (1964). Small Groups: Some Sociological Perspectives. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1976). “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality”. In S.J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, D. (1986). “Mental Simulation: An Effective Vehicle for Adult Learning”. International Journal of Innovation in Higher Education 3, 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithin, T., and C. Eden. (1986). “Computer Decision Support for Senior Managers: Encouraging Exploration”. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 25, 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.W., P.C. Berry, and C.H. Block (1958). “Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking?” Administrative Sciences Quarterly 3, 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1983). The Art of Judgement. London: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Oech, R. (1982). A Whack on the Side of the Head. Menlo Park, CA: Creative Think.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. (1990). The Child in the City. London: Bedford Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R., G. DeSanctis, and M.S. Poole. (1988). “Using a GDSS To Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences”. MIS Quarterly, forthcoming.

  • Zigurs, I., M. Poole, and G. DeSanctis. (1988). “A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Decision Making”. Working Paper MISRC-WP-88-07, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, 26 Richmond Street, G1 1XH, Glasgow, Scotland

    Colin Eden

Authors
  1. Colin Eden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eden, C. A framework for thinking about Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS). Group Decis Negot 1, 199–218 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126263

Key words

Search

Navigation