Skip to main content
Log in

A rapid cell membrane permeability test using flourescent dyes and flow cytometry

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A reliable and rapid test to detect cytotoxic chemicals which affect cell membranes is described. Fluorescein diacetate freely penetrates intact cells where it is hydrolyzed to its fluorochrome, fluorescein, which is retained in the cell due to its polarity. On the other hand, ethidium bromide is known to be excluded from the intact cell, staining only nucleic acids of membrane-damaged cells. The combination of both fluorochromes results in counter-staining: intact cells fluoresce green (cytoplasm) and membrane-damaged cells fluoresce red (nucleus and RNA). Rat thymocytes freshly isolated without enzyme treatment were incubated simultaneously with test substance and dye solution fluorescein diacetate and ethidium bromide. A two-parameter analysis was performed on a flow cytometer with an on-line computer. Concentration-dependent effects of various detergents and solvents were quantified by measuring the amount of dye retention, i.e., the decrease or increase in fluorescein—fluorescence (peak shift), and the decrease in dye exclusion (increase in ethidium bromide-staining) relative to the untreated control. The assay can be used for rapid monitoring of chemical insults to cell membranes which precede the decrease of the viability measured by pure dye exclusion techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DMA:

dimethyl sulfate

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

EB:

ethidium bromide

F:

fluorescein

FDA:

fluorescein diacetate

FS25 :

concentration of test substance resulting in a F-peak left-shift of 25% from control

PBS:

phosphate buffered saline

SCT:

forward light scatter

SDS:

sodium dodecyl sulfate

References

  • DANKBERG, F. and PERSIDSKY, M.D. (1976). A test of granulocyte membrane integrity and phagocytic function. Cryobiology 13:430–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRAIZE, J.H., WOODWARD, G. and CALVERY, H.O. (1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J. Pharmac. Exp. Ther. 82:377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • EDIDIN, M. (1970). A rapid, quantitative flourescence assay for cell damage by cytotoxic antibodies. J. Immunol. 104:1303–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRANT, W.M. (1974). Toxicology of the eye. 2nd ed., C.C. Thomas, ed., 1201 pp. Springfield, IL (USA).

  • KEMP, R.B., MEREDITH, R.W.J., GAMBLE, S. and FROST, M. (1983). A rapid cell culture technique for assessing the toxicity of detergent-based products in vivo as a possible screen for eye irritancy in vivo. Cytobios 36:153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • KEMP, R.B., MEREDITH, R.W.J. and GAMBLE, S. (1985). Toxicity of commercial products on cells in suspension culture: a possible screen for the Draize eye irritation test. Fd. Chem. Toxicol. 23:267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOKEN, R., STOUT, R.D. and HEITZENBERG, L.A. (1979). Lymphoid cell analysis and sorting. Chapter 28, pp. 505–528. In: Flow Cytometry and Sorting, ed. by M.R. Melamed, P.F. Mullaney and M.L. Mendelson. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARTEL, J.L., JARAMILLO, S., ALLEN, Jr., F.H. and RUBINSTEIN, P. (1974). Serology for automated cytotoxicity assays. Contrast fluorescence test. Vox Sang. 27:13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROTMAN, B. and PAPERMASTER, B.W. (1966). Membrane properties of living mammalian cells as studied by enzymatic hydrolysis of fluorogenic esters. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 55:134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCAIFE, M.C. (1982). An investigation of detergent action on cells in vitro and possible correlation with in vivo data. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 4:179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCAIFE, M.C. (1985). An in vitro cytotoxicity test to predict the ocular irritation potential of detergent and detergent products. Fd. Chem. Toxicol. 23:253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWUGER, M.J. and BARTNIK, F.G. (1980). Interaction of anionic surfactants with proteins, enzymes and membranes. In: Anionic surfactants, ed. by Ch. Gloxhuber pp. 1–49. M. Decker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SENGBUSCH, VON, G., COUWENBERGS, C., KUHNER, J. and MULLER, U. (1976). Fluorogenic substrate turnover in single living cells. Histochemical J. 8:341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHOPSIS, C., BORENFREUND, E., WALBERG, J. and STARK, D.M. (1985). A battery of potential alternatives to Draize test: uridine uptake inhibition, morphological cytotoxicity, macrophage chemotaxis and exfoliate cytology. Fd. Chem. Toxicol. 23:259–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aeschbacher, M., Reinhardt, C.A. & Zbinden, G. A rapid cell membrane permeability test using flourescent dyes and flow cytometry. Cell Biol Toxicol 2, 247–255 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122693

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122693

Key words

Navigation