Abstract
The progression of first meiotic prophase and synaptonemal complex (SC) formation in female rats, Rattus norvegicus S.D., is described through the analysis of the different stages of the first meiotic prophase, and confirms the high synchrony of the process in this species. Leptotene is a stage of very short duration and since pairing of the homologues begins very early, only a leptotene-zygotene stage can be distinguished. The progression of pairing during zygotene is asynchronous. The morphology of the SCs is similar to that described in other species. During diplotene and before desintegration of the lateral elements, desynapsis takes place.
In some oocytes a double or even multiple nature of lateral elements was seen. Associations between SCs and nucleoli or nucleolar filaments are frequent. The presence of fragmented SCs can be interpreted as a technical artifact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, T. G., 1963. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proc. R. Soc. B., 158: 417.
Beaumont, M. & Mandl, A. M., 1962. A quantitative and cytologieal study of oogonia and oocytes in foetal and neonatal rat. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 155: 557–579.
Bèzard, J. & Mauleon, R., 1984. Evolution des cellules germinales femelles au cours de la prophase méiotique chez le rat: critères de reconnaissance cytoplasmique et nucléaire des différonts stades en histologie fine. Reprod. Nutr. Dévelop. 24 (5A): 633–654.
Bojko, M., 1983. Human meiosis VIII. Chromosome pairing and formation of the synaptonemal complex in oocytes. Carlsberg Res. Comm. 48: 457–483.
Borum, K., 1961. Oogenesis in the mouse. A study of the meiotic prophase. Expl Cell Res. 24: 495–507.
Comings, D. E. & Okada, T. A., 1970. Whole mount electron microscopy of meiotic chromosomes and the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma 30: 269–286.
Comings, D. E. & Okada, T. A., 1971. Fine structure of the synaptonemal complex. Regular and stereo electron microscopy of deoxiribonuclease-treated whole mount preparations. Expl Cell Res. 65: 104–116.
Counce, S. J. & Meyer, G. F., 1973. Differentiation of the synaptonemal complex and the kinetochore in Locusta spermatocytes studied by whole mount electron microscopy. Chromosoma 44: 231–253.
Dietrich, A. J. J. & De Boer, P., 1983. A sequential analysis of the development of the synaptonomal complex in spermatocytes of the mouse by electron microscopy using hydroxyurea and agar filtration. Genetica 61: 119–120.
Dietrich, A. J. J. & Mulder, R. J. P., 1981a. The staining of the synaptonemal complex for light microscopic study in the mouse. Stain Technology 36: 163–167.
Dietrich, A. J. J. & Mulder, R. J. P., 1981b. A light microscopic study of the development and behaviour of the synaptonemal complex in spermatocytes of the mouse. Chromosoma 83: 409–418.
Dresser, M. E. & Moses, M. J., 1980. Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus). IV. Light and electron microscopy of synapsis and nuclear development by sliver staining. Chromosoma 76:1–22.
Del Mazo, J. & Gil-Alberdi, L., 1986. Multistranded organization of the lateral elements of the synaptonemal complex in the rat and mouse. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 41: 219–224.
Freixa, I., Garcia, M., Ponsa, M., Navarro, J. & Egozcue, J., 1983. Cycle of synaptonemal complexes in mammalian oocytes. Clinical Genetics 23: 211a.
Freixa, L., Garcia, M., Ponsà, M., Navarro, J. & Egozcue, J., 1985. Sequential study of the synaptonemal complex in syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) and mouse (Mus musculus) oocytes by light and electron microscopy. Genetica 67: 87–97.
Garcia, M., Dictrich, A. J. J., Freixa, L., Vink, A. C. G., Ponsà, M. & Egozcue, J., 1987. Development of the first meiotic prophase stages in human fetal oocytes by Light and Electron microscopy. Human Genet cs 77: 223–232.
Guitart, M., Coll, M.D., Ponsà, M. & Egozcue, J., 1985. Sequential study of synaptonemal complexes in mouse spermatocytes by light and electron microscopy. Genetica 67: 21–30.
Mirre, C. & Stahl, A., 1978. Ultrastructure and activity of the nucleolar organizer in the mouse oocyte during meiotic prophase. J. Cell Sci. 31: 79–100.
Moses, M. J., 1968. Synaptonemal complex. Ann. Rev. Genet. 2: 363–412.
Moses, M. J., 1977. Microspreading and the synaptonemal complex in cytogenetic studies. Chromosomes Today 6: 71–82.
Navarro, J., Vidal, F., Guitart, M. & Egozeue, J., 1981. A method for the sequential study of synaptonemal complexes by light and electron microscopy. Hum. Genet. 59: 419–421.
Pathak, S. & Hsu, T.C., 1979. Silver-stained structures in mammalian spermatocytes. Chromosoma 70: 195–203.
Rivelis, C., Prepin, J., Vigier, B. & Jost, A., 1976. Prophase méiotique dans les céllules germinales de l'ebauche ovarienne de rat cultivée in vitro en milieu anhormonal. C. r. Acad. Sci. Paris, 282, D: 1429–1432.
Sheridan, W. F. & Barnett, R. J., 1969. Cytochemical studies on chromosome ultrastructure. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 27: 216–229.
Speed, R. M., 1982. Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. Chromosoma 89: 427–437.
Speed, R. M., 1985. The prophase stages in human foetal oocytes studied by light and electron microscopy. Hum. Genet. 69: 69–75.
Speed, R. M. & Chandley, A. C., 1983. Meiosis in foetal mouse ovary II. Oocyte development and aged-related aneuploidy. Does a production line exist? Chromosoma 88: 184–189.
Tease, C. & Fisher, G., 1986. Further examination of the production line hypothesis in mouse foetal oocytes. Chromosoma 93: 447–452.
Vidal, F., Navarro, J., Templado, C., Marina, S. & Egozcue, J., 1984. Development and behaviour of synaptonemal complexes in human spermatocytes by light and electron microscopy. Hum. Genet. 68: 142–147.
Wallace, B. M. N. & Hultén, M. A., 1985a. Meiotic chromosome pairing in the human female. Ann. Hum. Genet. 49: 215–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pujol, R., Garcia, M., Freixa, L. et al. Sequential study of the synaptonemal complex in rat (Rattus norvegicus) oocytes by light and electron microscopy. Genetica 77, 179–187 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122388
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122388