Abstract
Wind profile data within the first two kilometres of a coast have been used to study the wind field modification downstream of this surface discontinuity. The land area is generally very flat, having an overall roughness length of 0.04 m. A wind model, suitable for practical applications and inexpensive to run, has been tested against the data and was found to give satisfactory results. Knowing the climatological statistics of wind and stratification, e.g., at the coast, the model may thus be used to estimate, on a climatological basis, how the wind field is modified with distance inland, at least in areas with only minor topography. This type of information is of great importance when locating wind turbines. It is in these cases also important to know the statistics of the internal boundary-layer (IBL) height, as the turbulence intensity may be quite different in and above the IBL, which in turn may influence load and fatigue calculations. Using the wind profile data, the IBL height was clearly discernible in the majority of cases. Having very unstable stratification over land, the IBL height could, however, not be determined from the wind profiles, as the wind in these cases did not decrease inland. This result was also obtained using the wind model. A simple model of the type z IBL = a · x b, was instead tested, and was shown to give reasonable results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandersson, H. and Bergström, H.: 1979, Evaluation of Double Theodolite Pibal Tracking Data. Report No. 56. Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, 72 pp.
André, J. C., de Moor, G., Lacarrère, P., Therry, G., and du Vachat, R.: 1978, ‘Modeling the 24-hour Evolution of the Mean and Turbulent Structure of the Planetary Boundary Layer’, J. Atm. Sci. 35, 1861–1883.
Bergström, H.: 1986, ‘A Simplified Boundary Layer Wind Model for Practical Application’, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 25, No. 6, 813–824.
Bornstein, R. D. and Johnson, D. S.: 1977, ‘Urban-Rural Wind Velocity Differences’, Atmos. Environ. 11, 597–604.
Bradley, E. F.: 1968, ‘A Micrometeorological Study of Velocity Profiles and Surface Drag in the Region Modified by a Change in Surface Roughness’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 361–379.
Elliott, W. P.: 1958, ‘The Growth of the Atmospheric Internal Boundary Layer’, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 39, No. 6, 1048–1054.
Enger, L.: 1986, ‘A Higher Order Closure Model Applied to Dispersion in a Convective PBL’, Atmos. Environ. 20, No. 5, 879–894.
Gamo, M., Yamamoto, S., and Yokoyama, O.: 1982, ‘Airborne Measurements of the Free Convective Internal Boundary Layer During the Sea Breeze’, J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 60, 1284–1298.
Hunt, J. C. R. and Simpson, J. E.: 1982, ‘Atmospheric Boundary Layers over Non-Homogeneous Terrain’, in E. J. Plate (ed.), Engineering Meteorology, Chapter 7, pp. 269–318.
Högström, U.: 1982, ‘A Critical Evaluation of the Aerodynamical Error of a Turbulence Instrument’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 21, 1838–1844.
Högström, U., Enger, L., and Knudsen, E.: 1980, ‘A Complete System for Probing the Detailed Structure of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow’, Report No. 60, Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, 47 pp.
Högström, U., Taesler, R., Karlsson, S., Enger, L., and Smedman, A.: 1978, ‘The Uppsala Urban Meteorology Project’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 15, 69–80.
Højstrup, J.: 1981, ‘A Simple Model for the Adjustment of Velocity Spectra in Unstable Conditions Downstream of an Abrupt Change in Roughness and Heat Flux’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 21, 341–356.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1974, ‘A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers’, J. Atm. Sci. 31, 1791–1806.
Miyake, M.: 1965, ‘Transformation of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer over Inhomogeneous Surfaces’, Scientific Report, Office of Naval Research, Contract 477(24) (NR 307-252).
Ogawa, Y. and Ohara, T.: 1985, ‘The Turbulent Structure of the Internal Boundary Layer Near the Shore (Part 1: Case Study)’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 31, 369–384.
Pasquill, F.: 1972, ‘Some Aspects of Boundary Layer Description’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 469–494.
Peterson, E. W.: 1969, ‘Modification of Mean Flow and Turbulent Energy by a Change in Surface Roughness under Conditions of Neutral Stability’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 561–575.
Peterson, E. W., Kristensen, L., and Chang-Chun, Su: 1976, ‘Some Observations and Analysis of Wind over Non-uniform Terrain’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 102, 857–869.
Raynor, G., Sethuraman, S., and Brown, R.: 1979, ‘Formation and Characteristics of Coastal Internal Boundary Layers during Onshore Flows’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 16, 487–514.
Salomonsson, S.: 1982, ‘Doppler Sodar for Wind Measurements’, Report No. FL8-2 Swedish Space Corporation.
Smedman, A. and Bergström, H.: 1984, ‘Flow Characteristics Above a Very Low and Gently Sloping Hill’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 29, 21–37.
Smedman, A. and Högström, U.: 1978, ‘A Practical Method for Determining Wind Frequency Distributions for the Lowest 200 Meters from Routine Meteorological Data’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 7, 942–954.
Smedman, A. and Högström, U.: 1983, ‘Turbulent Characteristics of a Shallow Convective Internal Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25, 271–287.
Smedman, A.and Melas, D.: 1986, ‘The öresund Experiment. Description of Measurements Performed by MIUU’, Report No. 84, Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, 45 pp.
Smedman, A. and Lundin, K.: 1987, ‘Psychrometer Systems for Measurements of Temperature and Humidity Profiles in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, Report No. 76, Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University.
Wood, D. M.: 1981, ‘Internal Boundary Layer Growth Following a Step Change in Surface Roughness’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 22, 241–244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergström, H., Johansson, PE. & Smedman, AS. A study of wind speed modification and internal boundary-layer heights in a coastal region. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 42, 313–335 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121589
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121589