Skip to main content
Log in

Human osteoprogenitor responses to orthopaedic implant: mechanism of cell attachment and cell adhesion

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cell culture models are becoming prevalent in the investigation of tissue responses to implant materials. Cellular attachment and cell adhesion studies can aid in the development of more effective orthopaedic and dental implants. Cell attachment was studied on extracellular matrix proteins (type I, IV collagen, peptide solubilized elastin (PSE), fibronectin laminin). Human osteoprogenitor cells responded differently to these collagenous and non-collagenous proteins. PSE and type I or type IV collagen are the most effective proteins in cellular attachment and cell spreading. Cell behaviour was measured in the presence of macroporous materials (Porites astreoïdes from the West Indies and a bovine hydroxyapatite ceramic ENDOBON®) and bioartificial connective matrices comprising hydroxyapatite, peptide solubilized elastin, collagen, fibronectin and chondroïtin-6-sulfate, components of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Human osteoprogenitor cells responded differently to the materials tested according to the content of components of ECM. About 40% of attached cells were obtained on the composite materials PSE, collagen, fibronectin and chondroïtin-6-sulfate, and about 10% on the macroporous materials, whatever their porosity and their chemical components. These results demonstrate a need for more effective surface treatment to promote cell attachment, cell spreading and cell growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. A. F. Pupeel, R. N. Supodhi, T. M. Dupuc and J. E. Dupavies. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 252 (1992) 71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Pupuleo, L. A. Hupolleran, R. H. Duporemus and R. Bupizios. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 (1991) 711.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. A. Pupuleo and R. Bupizios. J. Biomed. Res. 26 (1992) 291.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. A. Mupalik, D. A. Pupuleo, R. Bupizios and R. H. Duporemus. Biomaterials 13 (1992) 123.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Nupaji and M. F. Huparmand. Biomaterials 12 (1991) 690.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. C. A. Vuprouwenvelder, C. G. Guproot and K.upde Guproot. Biomaterials 13 (1992) 382.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Gupuillemin, M. Lupaunay and A. Mupeunier. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 4 (1993) 575.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Hupunter, C. W. Auprcher, P. S. Wupalker and G. W. Buplunn. Biomaterials 16 (1995) 287.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Fupaucheux, R. Bupareille, F. Rupouais and J. Aupmedee. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 5 (1994) 635.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. E. Dupavies and T. Mupatsuda, Scanning Microsc. 2 (1988) 1445.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Supoligo, R. Supchiro, R. Lupuksch, G. Mupanara, N. Qupuirici, C. Puparravicini and G. Lupambertenghi Dupeliliers. Brit. J. Haematol. 76 (1990) 323.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. J. Mupajeska, M. Puport and T. A. Eupinhorn. J. Bone Min. Res. 8 (1993) 277.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Vupilamitjana-Amedee, R. Bupareille, F. Rupouais, A. I. Cupaplan and M. F. Huparmand, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 29 (1993) 699.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rupovira, R. Bupareille, I. Lupopez, F. Rupouais, L. Bupordenave, C. Rupey and M. Rupabaud. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 4 (1993) 372.

    Google Scholar 

  15. U. Lupandegren. J. Immunobiological Meth. 67 (1984) 379.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Aupmedee, R. Bupareille, R. Jupeandot, L. Bupordenave, M. Rupemy, F. Rupouais and Ch. Bupaquey. Biomaterials 15 (1994) 1029.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. R. Hupowlett, M. D. M. Eupvans, W. R. Wupalsh, G. Jupohnson and J. G. Supteele. Biomaterials 15 (1994) 213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verrier, S., Bareille, R., Rovira, A. et al. Human osteoprogenitor responses to orthopaedic implant: mechanism of cell attachment and cell adhesion. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 7, 46–51 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121189

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121189

Keywords

Navigation