Skip to main content
Log in

Weak link between conventional and unconventional superconductors

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In this paper we consider the Josephson coupling between a conventional and an unconventional superconductor through a constriction. It is demonstrated that a weak link is very different from a tunnel junction. In particular, in an orientation where the coupling in a tunnel junction vanishes because of symmetry, the Josephson current in the case of a weak link can nevertheless be finite, albeit with the distinctive characteristics of(i) a current phase relationship with a period of 2π/n, (ii) the critical current near but below the transition temperature T 1 of the lower transition temperature superconductor is proportional to (1−(T/T 1))n/2, where n is an integer determined by the symmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Pals, W. von Haeringen, and M. H. van Maaren, Phys. Rev. B 15, 2592 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Ambegaokar and A. Baratoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 486 (1963); Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 104 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. A. Sauls, Z. Zou, and P. W. Anderson, unpublished.

  4. V. B. Geshkenbein and A. I. Larkin, Sov. JETP Lett. 43, 395 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Millis, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. B 38, 4504 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. S. Sun, J. A. Sauls, and S. K. Yip, unpublished.

  7. V. Ambegaokar, P. G. deGennes, and D. Rainer, Phys. Rev. A 9, 2676 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. K. Yip, O. F. de Alcantara Bonfim, and P. Kumar, Phys. Rev. B 41, 11214 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Rainer and J. A. Sauls, Proc. of the 18th Int. Conf. on Low Temp. Physics, Kyoto, 1987, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. suppl. 26, 1804 (1987).

  10. K. K. Likharev, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 101 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Serene and D. Rainer, Phys. Rep. 101, 221 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. I. Kulik and Omel'yanchuk, Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 3, 459 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. J. Leggett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Annett and N. Goldenfeld, Proceedings of the Quantum Fluids and Solids 1992, J. Low Temp. Phys. 89, 197 (1992).

  15. J. Kwo, T. A. Fulton, M. Hong, and P. L. Gammel, Applied Phys. Lett. 56, 788 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. H. Greene et al.Physica C 162–164, 1069 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Akoh, C. Camerlingo, and S. Takaga, Applied Phys. Lett. 56, 1487 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mark Lee, D. Lew, C. B. Eom, T. H. Geballe, and M. R. Beasley, Applied Phys. Lett. 57, 1152 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Steglich et al., J. of Applied Phys. 57, 3054 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yip, S. Weak link between conventional and unconventional superconductors. J Low Temp Phys 91, 203–218 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120849

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120849

Keywords

Navigation