Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study on the use of humor in the design of instruction

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the effects of three integrated and contiguous instructional designs using incongruity humor on the recognition and recall of information measured by immediate learning and retention tests. First graders in three classes (N=58) were randomly assigned to one of three humor design treatment groups and a control group. On two successive days prior to receiving a humor treatment, each group received a taped reading of a familiar story, which succeeded in the intended manipulation of subjects to low levels of arousal and interest across all groups. The three humor designs included a humor experience which was immediately followed by a serious presentation of new information (contiguous-immediate design), the same humor experience with a one week postponed presentation of the new information (contiguous-postponed design), and a presentation of the new information with humor interspersed within (integrated design). Results indicated that the two contiguous humor treatment groups had higher immediate memory and retention scores than the control group, particularly with regard to recall of the new information. The integrated humor treatment failed to have its intended humor reaction. Limitations of previous research, which generally does not support the instructional value of humor, are discussed in terms of basic theory and research in humor, motivation, and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, S. (1977). A modest proposal: the use of humor as a motivational and instructional tool. Forum for Reading, 7, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. (1972). Is physics a laughing matter? Physics Teacher, 10, 265–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W (1974). The use of sexual humor in teaching human sexuality at the university level. Family Coordinator, 23, 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (1972). What's wrong with humor research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, December.

  • Armour, R. (1975). Humor in the classroom. Independent School Bulletin, 35, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. (1969). Laughter, humor and play. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology. Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. (1972). Humor and its kin. In G. Goldstein and P. McGhee (Eds.). The Psychology of Humor. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. & McDonnell, P. (1965). Effects of stimulus complexity and incongruity on the duration of EEG desynchronization. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 18, 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Benjamin S. (1956). (Ed.). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. (1979). Self-esteem, self-concept, and task performance: replications, extensions, and possible explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 447–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. & Itzig, J. (1976). The interaction of humor and anxiety in academic test situations. Southern Methodist University, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 152 783).

  • Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A. & Elliot, S. (1981). Effects of humorous illustrations in college textbooks. Human Communication Research, 8, 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., Gula, J. & Zillmann, D. (1980). Humor in communication textbooks. Communication Education, 29, 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J. & Venus, P. (1980). The effect of humor on recall of a radio advertisement. Journal of Broadcasting, 24, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, G. & Schramm, W. (1975). Learning from TV: What the research says. National Association of Educational Broadcasters, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 109 985).

  • Deckers, L. & Kizer, P. (1975). Humor and the incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Psychology, 90, 215–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • deMatos, F. (1974). Humo(u)r, a neglected feature in foreign laguage teaching. Yazigi Institute, Brazil, March (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 150).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, B. & Rossett, A. (1982). Heuristics for humor in instruction. Performance and Instruction Journal, 21, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, Pennsylvania: Learning Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. (1976). (Ed.). Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: attention and memory (Volume 4). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, G. (1968). Comic cassettes for languages classes, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 026 891).

  • Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious (Standard Edition, Volume 8). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, L. & McMillan, M. (1978). Humor and the reading program. Journal of Reading, 1978, 21, 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, W. & Routh, D. (1975). Humor response as related to violation of expectancies and to stimulus intensity in a weight-judgment task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 673–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. & Ortiz, M. (1980). Using humor as a training tool. Session conducted at Training Magazine's Fourth Annual Conference, New York, December.

  • Gruner, C. (1967). The effect of humor on speaker ethos and audience information gain. Journal of Communication, 17, 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, C. (1970). The effect of humor in dull and interesting informative speeches. Central States Speech Journal, 21, 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, K. V. (1978). Why be a great teacher in the face of apathy? NASSP Bulletin, 62, 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houndoumadi, A. (1977). Humor as a facilitator in the learning and retention of written instructional material (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon). Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 3380A (University Microfilms No. 77-26, 448).

  • Jacobson, R. (1984). Use of humor by college teachers found to stir suspicion and hostility. Chronicle of Higher Education, 28, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. & Pascoe, G. (1969). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M. & Bimbrauer, J. S. (1978). Research to develop effective teaching and management techniques for severely disturbed and retarded children (Final Report). Virginia University School of Education, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 757).

  • Keller, J. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. (1970). An experimental study of the effect of humorous message content upon ethos and persuasiveness. Paper presented at the convention of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, December.

  • Krogh, S. (1985). Should school be a laughing matter? Early Years, 15, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasky, C. (1979). Some funny business in your reading classes. Journal of Reading, 22, 731–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. (1982). Humorous teaching makes serious learning. Teaching English in the Two-year College, 8, 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz, D. (1974). Effects of humor on persuasion. Sociometry, 37, 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1971). Cognitive development and children's comprehension of humor. Child Development, 42, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1972). On the cognitive origins of incongruity humor: fantasy assimilation versus reality assimilation. In J. Goldstein and P. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1974). Development of children's ability to create the joking relationship. Child Development, 45, 552–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. (1976). Children's appreciation of humor: a test of the cognitive congruency principle. Child Development, 47, 420–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J. (1968). A funny thing happened to me on the way to English 1-A. In Classroom practices and teaching English: a sixth report of the NCTE Committee on Promising Practices. National Council of Teachers of English, Champaign, IL., (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 029 020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. (1977). A study of children's riddles using Piaget-derived definitions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 130, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietropinto, A. (1974). A psychiatrist's case for Jabberwocky and other violent nonsense. Learning, 2, 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. & Lawler, E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL.: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. (1972). An introduction to social learning theory. In J. Rotter, J. Chance & E. Phares (Eds.), Applications of a social learning theory of personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkaus, M. (1981). Use of humor in instruction. NSPI Journal, 20, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychlak, J. (1977). The psychology of rigorous humanism. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C. (1972). A system of cognitive stimulation in instructional strategies. Instructional Science, 1, 313–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, E. & Moore, R. (1980). Cartoon embellishments in informative presentations. Educational Communication and Technology, 28, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. (1975). The role of familiarity in the appreciation of humor. Journal of Personality, 43, 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (1964). The effectiveness of humor in informative speeches. Central States Speech Journal, 14, 295–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (1972). The relationship between humor and retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, December.

  • Thorndike, E. (1933). A proof of the law of effect. Science, 77, 173–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. (1913). The psychology of learning (Volume 2). New York: Teachers' College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, S. (1979). Joke telling as a tool in ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. & White, W. (1979). Experimental manipulation of the recall of narrative materials by five-year-olds. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 25, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehling, B. (1972). Arousal in verbal learning. In C. Duncan, L. Sechrest & A. Melton (Eds.), Human memory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C., Keller, B. & Kopp, J. (1980). Cognitive and affective effects on pre-school children of surprise word substitutions in a familiar story. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April.

  • Wandersee, J. (1982). Humor as a teaching strategy. American Biology Teacher, 44, 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, L. (1978). Riddle me this. TESL Talk, 10, 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1977). Humor and communication. In A. Chapman & H. Foot (Eds.). It's a funny thing, humor. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., Masland, J., Weaver, J., Lacey, L., Jacobs, N., Dow, J., Klein, C. & Banker, S. (1984). Effects of humorous distortions on children's learning from educational television. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 802–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J. (1983). Uses and effects of humor in educational ventures. In P. McGhee & J. Goldstein (Eds.), The handbook of humor research: applied studies of humor. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., Williams, B., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. & Wolf, M. (1980). Acquisitions of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 170–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, A. (1976). Facilitating effects of humor on creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 318–322.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vance, C.M. A comparative study on the use of humor in the design of instruction. Instr Sci 16, 79–100 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120007

Keywords

Navigation