Abstract
The introduction into a mesoscale model of random (in space) variations in roughness length, or random (in space and time) surface perturbations of temperature and friction velocity, produces a measurable, but barely significant, response in the simulated flow dynamics of the lower atmosphere. The perturbations are an attempt to include the effects of sub-grid variability into the ensemble-mean parameterization schemes used in many numerical models. Their magnitude is set in our experiments by appeal to real-world observations of the spatial variations in roughness length and daytime surface temperature over the land on horizontal scales of one to several tens of kilometers. With sea-breeze simulations, comparisons of a number of realizations forced by roughness-length and surface-temperature perturbations with the standard simulation reveal no significant change in ensemble mean statistics, and only small changes in the sea-breeze vertical velocity. Changes in the updraft velocity for individual runs, of up to several cms-1 (compared to a mean of 14 cms-1), are directly the result of prefrontal temperature changes of 0.1 to 0.2K, produced by the random surface forcing. The correlation and magnitude of the changes are entirely consistent with a gravity-current interpretation of the sea breeze.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arritt, R. W.: 1987, ‘The Effect of Water Surface Temperature on Lake Breezes and Thermal Internal Boundary Layers’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 40, 101–125.
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: 1971, ‘Flux-profile Relationship in the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181–189.
Dell'Ossi, L.: 1984, ‘High Resolution Experiments with the ECMWF Model: A Case Study’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 112, 1853–1883.
Garratt, J. R.: 1977a, ‘Mean Monthly Stress and Aerodynamic Roughness Over Australia’, Tech. Paper No. 29, CSIRO Div. Atmos. Phys., 19pp.
Garratt, J. R.: 1977b, ‘Review of Drag Coefficients over Oceans and Continents’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 105, 915–929.
Garratt, J. R. and Physick, W. L.: 1986, ‘Numerical Study of Atmospheric Gravity Currents. II: Evolution and External Influences’, Beitr. Phys. Atmosph. 60, 88–102.
Garratt, J. R. and Pielke, R. A.: 1990, ‘On the Sensitivity of Mesoscale Models to Surface-Layer Parameterization Constants’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 48, 377–387.
Hadfield, M. G.: 1988, ‘The Response of the Atmospheric Convective Boundary Layer to Surface Inhomogeneities’, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Colorado, 401 pp.
Hadfield, M. G., Cotton, W. C., and Pielke, R. A.: 1988a, ‘Large-Eddy Simulations of Convective Boundary Layer Circulations Driven by Microscale Surface Features’, preprint Volume, Eighth Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion, American Meteorological Society, San Diego, California, pp. 33–36.
Hadfield, M. G., Cotton, W. C. and Pielke, R. A.: 1988b, ‘Comments on “An Analysis of Closures for Pressure-Scalar Covariances in the Convective Boundary Layer”’, J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 1970–1972.
Hechtel, L. M. and Stull, R. B.: 1985, ‘Statistical Measures of Surface Inhomogeneity, and its Potential Impact on Boundary Layer Turbulence’, preprint Volume, Seventh Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion, American Meteorological Society, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 144–146.
Lenschow, D. H. and Dutton, J. A.: 1964, ‘Surface Temperature Variations Measured from an Airplane over Several Surface Types’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 3, 65–69.
Louis, J. F.: 1979, ‘A Parametric Model of Vertical Eddy Fluxes in the Atmosphere’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 17, 187–202.
Mahrer, Y. and Pielke, R. A.: 1977, ‘A Numerical Study of the Airflow over Irregular Terrain’, Beitr. Phys. Atmosph. 50, 98–113.
Mahrt, L.: 1987, ‘Grid-Averaged Surface Fluxes’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 1550–1560.
Mason, P. J.: 1988, ‘The Formation of Areally-Averaged Roughness Lengths’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. 114, 399–420.
McNider, R. T.: 1981, ‘Investigation of the Impact of Topographic Circulations on the Transport and Dispersion of Air Pollutants’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, 210 pp.
McNider, R. T. and Pielke, R. A.: 1981, ‘Diurnal Boundary-Layer Development over Sloping Terrain’, J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2198–2212.
Pielke, R. A.: 1984, Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling, Academic Press, New York, 612 pp.
Pielke, R. A. and Cotton, W. C.: 1977, ‘A Mesoscale Analysis over South Florida for a High Rainfall Event’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 105, 342–362.
Sud, Y. C. and Smith, W. E.: 1984, ‘Ensemble Formulations of Surface Fluxes and Improvement in Evapotranspiration and Cloud Parameterizations in a GCM’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 29, 185–210.
Taylor, P. A.: 1987, ‘Comments and Further Analysis on the Effective Roughness Length for Use in Numerical Three-Dimensional Models’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 39, 403–419.
Zilitinkevitch, S. S.: 1970, The Dynamics of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Hydrometeorological Publishing House, Leningrad, (in Russian - English translation by C. Long), 289 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garratt, J.R., Pielke, R.A., Miller, W.F. et al. Mesoscale model response to random, surface-based perturbations — A sea-breeze experiment. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 52, 313–334 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119427
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119427