Skip to main content
Log in

Constitutional change and agenda control

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, B.A. (1984) The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution. Yale Law Journal, 93: 1013–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, (1954) Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S., 483.

  • Browne, C.E. (1973) (Compiler), State Constitutional Convention: From Independence to the Completion of the Present Union, A Bibliography. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1975) Public Finance and Public Choice. National Tax Journal, 28: 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • and Bush, W.C. (1974) Political Constraints on Contractual Redistribution. American Economic Review, 64: 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, W.C. (1972) Individual Welfare in Anarchy. Explorations in The Theory of Anarchy, (ed.) G. Tullock. Blacksburg, Virginia: Center for the Study of Public Choice: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • and Mayer, L. (1974) Some Implications of Anarchy for the Distribution of Property. Journal of Economic Theory, 8: 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, E.E., Jr., Goodman, J.S., and Swanson, W.R. (1975) State Constitutional Conventions: The Politics of the Revision Process in Seven States. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments (1982) The Book of the States. 24: Lexington, Kentucky: Council of State Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A.T. and Mackay, R.J. (1983) Gatekeeping and Monopoly Power of Committees: An Analysis of Sincere and Sophisticated Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 27: 740–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • , and Weaver, C.L. (1979) Spending Limitations, Agenda Control and Voters' Expectations. National Tax Journal, 32: 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • and Parks, R.P. (1977) A Problem with Public Sector Preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 14: 454–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • and (1979) Deriving Public Sector Preferences. Journal of Public Economics, 11: 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, W.F. (1910) The Revision and Amendment of State Constitutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, (1907) Frantz v. Autry. 180 OK. 561, 91 P. 193.

  • Halevy, B.J. (1967) (Compiler) A Selective Bibliography on State Constitutional Revision. New York: National Municipal League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoar, R.S. (1971) Constitutional Conventions. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, J.A. (1869) A Treatise on the Principles of American Constitutional Law and Legislation. Chicago: E.B. Myers & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • League of Women Voters (1970) Outlook for the 70s: State Constitutional Revision. Washington, D.C.: League of Women Voters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis (1873) Loomis v. Jackson. 6 W. Va. 613.

  • Mackay, R.J. and Weaver, C.L. (1978) Monopoly Bureaus and Fiscal Outcomes: Deductive Models and Implications for Reform. Policy Analysis and Deductive Reasoning, (eds.) G. Tullock and R. Wagner. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • and (1982) Instruments of Direct Democracy and Fiscal Outcomes in States. Economic Review, Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank.

  • Malinou (1975) Malinou v. Powers. 114 R.I. 399, 333 A. 2d 420.

  • McKelvey, R.D. (1976) Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and some Implications for Agenda Control. Journal of Economic Theory. 12: 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Civic Review Various issues.

  • National Municipal Review Various issues.

  • Olson, M., Jr. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opinion (1833) Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, etc. 6 Cushing R. 573.

  • Plott, C.R. (1967) A Notion of Equilibrium and Its Possibility Under Majority Rule. American Economic Review, 67: 787–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W.W. (1978) Institutional Approaches to Public Expenditure: Empirical Evidence from Swiss Municipalities. Journal of Public Economics. 9: 255–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1958) Justice As Fairness. Philosophical Review, 67: 164–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds (1964) Reynolds v. Sims. 377 U.S. 533.

  • Riker, W.H. (1982) Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. Political Equilibrium. (Eds.) Peter C. Ordeshook and Kenneth S. Shepsle. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1979) Bureaucrats vs. Voters: On the Political Economy of Resource Allocation by Direct Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93: 563–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1978) Instability of Simple Dynamic Games. Review of Economic Studies. 45: 575–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.S. (1979) Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science, 23: 27–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1982) Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions. Working Paper 82, Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, A.L. (1970) Thirty Years of State Constitution-Making, 1938–1968. New York: National Municipal League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindler, W.F. (1982) (Ed.) Sources and Documents of U.S. Constitutions. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck, J.A. (1981) Theory of Property Rights: with Application to the California Gold Rush. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells (1875) Wells v. Bain. 75 Pa. St. 39.

  • Yarger, S.R. (1976) (Compiler) State Constitutional Conventions: 1959–1975. A Bibliography. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Washington University. I would like to thank my research assistant, Kevin Sigrist, for the considerable help he has provided and my colleagues Barry Weingast, Bill Riker, and Ken Shepsle for helpful comments on previous drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denzau, A.T. Constitutional change and agenda control. Public Choice 47, 183–217 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119357

Keywords

Navigation