Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Limitations of the scrape-loading/dye transfer technique to quantify inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) is recognized as playing an important role in normal cell proliferation and development. Chemically induced alteration of GJIC has been proposed to be associated with abnormal cellular growth and/or tumor promotion. Several in vitro assays are currently used to determine the effects of chemicals on GJIC between cultured mammalian cells. One of these assays, the scrape-loading dye transfer (SLIDT) technique, is based on monitoring the transfer of the fluorescent dye Lucifer yellow from one cell into adjacent cells via functional gap junctions. The objective of our study was to evaluate and compare various approaches for quantifying results obtained with the SL/DT technique. Confluent cultures of either WB rat liver epithelial cells or LC-540 rat leydig cells were exposed to the animal tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), solvent (0.1% ethanol), or culture medium for one hour at 37° C prior to analysis of GJIC. Inhibition of dye transfer was clearly evident following TPA exposure. Quantification of this dye transfer was assessed via four approaches: manually counting the number of labeled cells; measuring the distance of dye travel from the scrape line; quantifying the amount of cellular dye uptake; and determining the distribution of dye away from the scrape line. Our results suggest that while the SL/DT technique can be effectively used as a tool to determine the qualitative presence or absence of GJIC, its use in quantifying changes in GJIC following chemical exposure is limited. Since concentration-dependent responses are critical in chemical testing, application of the SLIDT method should be restricted to a screening assay for qualitatively assessing the presence or absence of GJIC. Another assay (e.g., electrical coupling, microinjection, metabolic cooperation, radioactive metabolite transfer, or fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching) should be considered to quantify changes in GJIC and construct chemical concentration-response curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FBS,:

fetal bovine serum

GJIC,:

gap junctional intercellular communication

HBSS,:

Hank's balanced saline solution

SL/DT,:

scrape-loading/dye transfer

TPA,:

12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.

References

  • ASHIHARA, T., and BASREGA, R. (1979). “Cell Synchronization.” In: Methods in Enzymology, Cell Culture (W.B. Jakoby and I.R. Pastan, eds.). Col. LVIII. Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY. pp. 248–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • AZARNIA, R., DAHL, G., and LOEWENSTEIN, W.R. (1981). “Cell junction and cyclic AMP III: Promotion of junctional membrane permeability and junctional membrane particles in a junction-deficient cell type.” J. Membr. Bio. 63: 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOMBICK, D.W. (1990). “Gap junctional intercellular communication in various cell types after chemical exposure.” In Vitro Toxicol. 3: 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-FOULY, M.H., TROSKO, J.E., and CHANG, C.C. (1987). “Scrape-loading and dye transfer: A rapid and simple technique to study gap junctional intercellular communication.” Exp. Cell. Res. 168: 422–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, M.G., EL-FOULY, M.H., and TROSKO, J.E. (1988a). “Detection of inhibition of intercellular communication by the scrape-loading dye transfer technique: a concentration-response study.” In Vitro Toxicol. 2: 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, M.G., EL-FOULY, M.H., TROSKO, J.E., and SLEIGHT, S.D. (1988b). “Anchored cell analysis/sorting coupled with the scrape-loading dye transfer technique to quantify inhibition of gap-junctional intercellular communication in WB-F344 cells by 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexabromo-biphenyl.” J. Toxicol. Environ, Health 24: 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • FITZGERALD, D.J. and MURRAY, A.W. (1980). “Inhibition of intercellular communication by tumor-promoting phorbol esters.” Cancer Res. 40: 2935–2937.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLETCHER, W.H., SHIU, W.W., ISHIDA, T.A., HAVILAND, D.L., and WARE, C.F. (1987). “Resistance to the cytolytic action of lymphotoxin and tumor necrosis factor coincides with the presence of gap junctions uniting target cells.” J. Membr. Biol. 139: 956–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLODSTROM, S., WARNGARD, L., HEMMING, H., FRANSSON, R., and AHLBORG, V.G. (1988). “Tumor promotion related effects by the cyclodiene insecticide endosulfan studied in vitro and in vivo.” Pharmacol. Toxicol. 62: 230–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • JONE, C., TROSKO, J.E., and CHANG, C.C. (1987). “Characterization of a rat liver epithelial cell line to detect inhibitors of metabolic cooperation.” In Vitro Cell Develop. Biol. 36: 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAVANAGH, T.J., MARTIN, G.M., EL-FOULY, M.H., TROSKO, J.E., CHANG, C.C., and RABINOVITCH, P.S. (1987). “Flow cytometry and scrape-loading/dye transfer as a rapid quantitative measure of intercellular communication in vitro.” Cancer Res. 47: 6046–6051.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLAUNIG, J.E. and RUCH, R.J. (1990). “Role of inhibition of intercellular communication in carcinogenesis.” Lab. Invest. 62: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • LO, C.W. (1985). “Communication compartmentation and pattern formation in development.” In: Gap Junctions (M.V.L. Bennett and D.C. Spray, eds.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOCH-CARUSO, R., CALDWELL, V., CIMINI, M., and JUBERG, D. (1990). “Comparison of assays for gap junctional communication using human embryocarcinoma cells exposed to dieldrin.” Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 15: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOEWENSTEIN, W.R. (1979). “Junctional intercellular communication and the control of growth.” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 560: 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oupewenstein, W.R. (1981). “Junctional Communication: The cell-to-cell membrane channel.” Physiol. Rev. 829–913.

  • MADHUKAR, B.V., OH, S.Y., CHANG, C.C., WADE, M., and TROSKO, J.E. (1989). “Altered regulation of intercellular communication by epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factorbeta and peptide hormones in normal human keratinocytes.” Carcinogenesis 10: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKARNS, S.C. and DOOLITTLE, D.J. (1991). “litative comparison of intercellular communication following exposure to mainstream smoke condensate from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco.” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 111: 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKARNS, S.C., BOMBICK, D.W., and DOOLITTLE, D.J. (1991). “The rate of intercellular communication: An alternative method for measuring the effects of chemicals on gap junctions.” In Vitro Toxicol. 4: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNEIL, P.L., MURPHY, R.F., LANNI, F., and TAYLOR, D.L. (1984). “A method for incorporating macromolecules into adherent cells.” J Cell Biol. 98: 1556–1564.

    Google Scholar 

  • MURRAY, A.W. and FITZGERALD, D.T. (1979). “Tumor promoters inhibit metabolic cooperation in cocultures of epidermal and 3T3 cells.” Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun. 91: 395–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • MURRAY, S.A., LARSEN, W.J., TROUT, J., and DONTA, S.T. (1981). “Gap junction assembly and endocytosis correlated with patterns of growth in a cultured adrenal cortical tumor cell (SW13).” Cancer Res. 41: 4063–4074.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWBOLD, R.F. and AMOS, J. (1981). “Inhibition of metabolic cooperation between mammalian cells in culture by tumor promoters.” Carcinogenesis 2: 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHOLSON, G.L., DULSKI, K.M., and TROSKO, J.E (1988). “Loss of intercellular junctional communication correlates with metastatic potential in mammary adenocarcinoma cells.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 473–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • OH, S.Y., MADHUKAR, B.V., and TROSKO, J.E. (1988). “Inhibition of gap junctional blockage by palmitoyl carnitine and TMB-8 in a rat liver epithelial cell line.” Carcinogenesis 9: 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUCH, R.J. and KLAUNIG, J.E. (1986). “Effects of tumor promoters, genotoxic carcinogens and hepatocytotoxins on mouse hepatocyte intercellular communication.” Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2: 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • RUCH, R.J. and KLAUNIG, J.E. (1988). “Inhibition of mouse hepatocyte intercellular communication by paraquat-generated oxygen free radicals.” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 94: 427.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAEZ, J.C., BENNETT, M.V.L., SPRAY, D.C. (1987). “Carbon tetrchloride at hepatotoxic levels blocks reversibily gap junctions between rat hepatocytes.” Science 236: 967.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOCOLAR, S.J. and LOEWENSTEIN, W.R. (1978). “Methods for studying transmission through permeable cell-to-cell junctions.” In: Methods in Membrane Biology (E. Corn, ed.). Vol. 10. Plenum Press, New York, NY. pp. 123–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPRAY, D.C., GINZBERG, R.D., MORALES, E.A., GATMAITAIN, Z., and ARIAS, I.M. (1986). “Electrophysiological propterties of gap junctions between dissociated pairs of rat hepatocytes.” J. Cell Biol. 103: 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, W.W. (1978). “Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer.” Cell 14: 741–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, W.W. (1981). “Lucifer dyes-highly fluorescent dyes for biological tracing.” Nature 292: 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUTER, S., TROSKO, J.E., EL-FOULY, M.H., LOCKWOOD, L.R., and KOESTNER, A. (1987). “Dieldrin inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication in rat glial cells as measured by the fluorescence photobleaching and scrape loading/dye transfer assay.” Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 9: 785–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • TROSKO, J.E., CHANG, C.C. (1984). “Role of intercellular communication in tumor promotion.” In: Mechanisms of Tumor Promotion. Vol. IV: Cellular Responses to Tumor Promoters. (T.J. Slaga, ed.). CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL. p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • TROSKO, J.E., CHANG, C.C., and NETZLOFF, M. (1982). “The role of inhibited cell-cell communication in teratogenesis.” Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen. 2: 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • TROSKO, J.E., JONE, C. and CHANG, C.C. (1987). “Inhibition of gap-junctional intercellular communication in vitro by aldrin, dieldrin, and toxaphene: A possible cellular mechanism for their tumor-promoting and neurotoxic effects.” Mol. Toxicol. 1: 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • TSAO, M.S., GRISHAM, J.W., NELSON, K.G., and SMITH, J.D. (1985). “Phenotypic and karyotypic changes induced in cultured rat hepatic epithelial cell that expresses the ‘oval’ cell phenotype by exposure to N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitroguanidine.” Am. J. Pathol. 118: 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • TSAO, M.S., SMITH, J.D., NELSON, K.G., and GRISHAM, J.W. (1984). “A diploid epithelial cell line from normal adult rat liver with phenotypic properties of ‘oval’ cells.” Exp. Cell Res. 154: 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • WADE, M.H., TROSKO, J.E., and SCHINDLER, M. (1986). “A fluorescence photobleaching assay of gap junction-,mediated communication between human cells.” Science 232: 525–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • YAMASAKI, H., ENOMOTO, T., MARTEL, N., SHIBA, Y., and KANNO, Y. (1983). “Tumor promoter-mediated reversible inhibition of cell-cell communication (electrical coupling).” Exp. Cell Res. 146: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • YE, Y.Y., BOMBICK, D.W., DIRST, K., ZHANG, G., CHANG, C.C., TROSKO, J.E., AND AKERA, T. (1990). “The modulation of gap junctional commuciation by gossypol in various mammalian cell lines in vitro.” Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 14: 817–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • YOTTI, L.P., CHANG, C.C., and TROSKO, J.E. (1979). “Elimination of metabolic cooperation in Chinese hamster cells by a tumor promoter.” Science 206: 1089–1091.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cellular and Molecular Biology Division, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA

    Susan C. McKarns & David J. Doolittle

Authors
  1. Susan C. McKarns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David J. Doolittle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKarns, S.C., Doolittle, D.J. Limitations of the scrape-loading/dye transfer technique to quantify inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication. Cell Biol Toxicol 8, 89–103 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119297

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119297

Key words

Search

Navigation