Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetic studies in Cochlearia L. (Cruciferae). The origins of C. officinalis L. and C. micacea Marshall

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genome analysis has been used to investigate the evolutionary relationships of the tetraploid species in the genus Cochlearia. The results indicate that both C. officinalis L. (2n=24) and C. micacea Marshal (2n=26) are essentially autotetraploid in origin and that C. scotica Druce is simply a morphological variant of C. officinalis. The chromosomal relationships of the tetraploids to each other and to the diploids in the genus are discussed and the possible routes for the formation of all the species from a single, 2n=12, basic taxon are given. Evidence for the existence of a genic mechanism causing C. officinalis to form only bivalents is given and the mode of evolution of such a mechanism discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chater, A. D. & V. H. Heywood (1964). In: T. G. Tutin et al., Flora Europae-I. Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Clapham, A. R. (1952). In: A. R. Clapham et al., Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Crane M. B. & A. E. Gairdner (1923). Species crosses in Cochlearia with a preliminary account of their cytology. J. Gen. 13: 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington C. D. (1965). Cytology. Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey D. R. & P. G. Pendse (1967). Cytogenetics of crested wheatgrass triploids. Crop Sci. 7: 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill J. J. B. (1971a). Cytogenetic studies in Cochlearia L. The chromosomal homogeneity within both the 2n=12 diploids and the 2n=14 diploids and the cytogenetic relationship between the two chromosome levels. Ann. Bot. 35: 947–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill J. J. B. (1971b). The cytology and transmission of accessory chromosomes in Cochlearia pyrenaica DC. (Cruciferae). Caryologia 24: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill J. J. B. (1971c). Cochlearia scotica Druce — Does it exist in northern Scotland? Watsonia 8: 395–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, N. (1945). Nomenklatorische und systematische Studien über nordische Gefässpflanzen: Uppsala und Leipzig.

  • Lovkvist B. (1963a). Taxonomic problems in aneuploid complexes. Regnum veg. 27: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovkvist B. (1963b). Nagot om de skanska Cochlearia arterna. Bot. notiser 116: 326–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E. S. (1894). On an apparently undescribed Cochlearia from Scotland. J. Bot. Lond. 32: 289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosquin T. (1967). Evidence for autopolyploidy in Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Evolution 21: 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley R. (1960). The diploidisation of polyploid wheat. Heredity, Lond. 15: 407–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunte L. H. (1955). Cytogenetical studies in the Cochlearia officinalis complex. Hereditas 41: 499–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, T. & M. Westergaard (1948). In: A. Löve & D. Löve, Chromosome numbers of Northern plant species. Icel. Univ. Inst. Appl. Sci. Dept. Agric. Rep. B. 3: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasek F. C. (1956). Induced aneuploidy in Clarkia. Am. J. Bot. 43: 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gill, J.J.B. Cytogenetic studies in Cochlearia L. (Cruciferae). The origins of C. officinalis L. and C. micacea Marshall. Genetica 44, 217–234 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119107

Keywords

Navigation