7. In conclusion
We think that cameralism offers much interesting material to public choice scholars. Treated purely as a matter of intellectual history, cameralist thought reflects an integrated treatment of considerations that today are commonly apportioned among the disciplines of economics, political science, and public administration. The unified cameralist perspective centered on the theory and practice of statecraft should surely be congenial to public choice scholars. But there is also much opportunity for scholarship on the economic and political history of the German states during the cameralist period. While we have suggested that the various German states constituted what might be considered a competitive industry in the provision of collective services, comparatively little is known about how the various economic and political processes actually operated during this period. For instance, rules of dynastical succession surely conflict with the competitive model; there is little dynastical succession in economic life. Our quick, and far from complete reading of the history suggests that there may have been much less dynastical succession than is commonly believed, and that the management of states changed hands more frequently than commonly thought.Footnote 1 But we have little solid evidence to offer about this; we do think, though, that public choice scholarship could bring many valuable insights to bear on this period. Indeed, the various writers within the German Historical School have in many cases left a rich legacy concerning political economy to which public choice scholars could bring valuable perspectives and fresh questions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A prince who mismanaged his country frequently had to mortgage its revenue sources, or even parts of the entire country, to a more successful competitor. Similarly, treaties of succession would establish claims on the prince's throne after his death.
REFERENCES
Becker, G.S., and Stigler, G.J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and the compensation of enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies 3 (January): 1–18.
Brentano, L. (1912). Privatwirtschaftslehre und Volkswirtschaftslehre. Bank-Archiv 12 (1): 1–6.
Buchanan, J.M., and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Dittrich, E. (1974). Die deutschen und österreichischen Kameralisten. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Eheberg, K.T.R. von (1900). Finanzen und Finanzwirtschaft. Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, III, 902–936. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Ekelund, R.B., Jr., and Tollison, R.D. (1981). Mercantilism as a rent-seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Endres, M. (1900). Forstpolitik. In Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, III, 1150–1186. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Gryphius, A. (1883). Gryphius' Werke. Ed. by H. Palm. Vol. 29 of ‘Deutsche National-Litteratur’, ed. by Joseph Kürschner. Berlin: W. Spemann, 1883.
Humpert, M. (1937). Bibliographie der Kameralwissenschaften. Köln: Karl Schroeder Verlag.
Rimpler. Geschichte der Domänen. In Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, III, 194–205. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Schmoller, G. von. (1884). Studien Uber die wirtschaftliche Politik Friedrichs des Grossen. Schmollers Jahrbuch 8: 1–61, 345–421, 999–1091.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1954). History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Small, A.W. (1909). The cameralists: Pioneers of German social polity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sonstelie, J.C., and Portney, P.C. (1978). Profit maximizing communities and the theory of local public expenditure. Journal of Urban Economics 5 (April): 263–277.
Teutophilus, C. (1685). Entdeckte Goldgrube in der Accise. Zerbst: Johann Lüderwald.
Tribe, K. (1984). Cameralism and the science of government. Journal of Modern History 56 (June): 263–284.
Wedgwood, C.V. (1939). The Thirty Years War. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wicksell, K. (1896). Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Witt, P.-C. (1970). Die Finanzpolitik des Deutschen Reiches von 1903 bis 1913. Lübeck: Matthiesen Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We should like to thank Robert Tollison and Gordon Tullock for helpful advice on an earlier version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Backhaus, J., Wagner, R.E. The cameralists: A public choice perspective. Public Choice 53, 3–20 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115651
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115651