Skip to main content
Log in

If people vote because they like to, then why do so many of them lie?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of those eligible, about 40% do not vote in presidential elections. When asked, about a quarter of those nonvoters will lie to the survey takers and claim that they did. Increases in education are associated with higher voting rates and lower rates of lying overall, but with increased rates of lying conditional on not voting. This paper proposes a model of voter turnout in which people who claim to vote get praise from other citizens. Those who lie must bear the cost of lying. The model has a stable equilibrium with positive rates of voting, honest non-voting, and lying. Reasonable parameter changes produce changes in these proportions in the same direction as the changes actually observed across education levels. I argue that a model where people vote because they want to be known as voters provides a better explanation for observed voting behavior than does a model where people vote because they want to vote.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P.R., Aldrich, J.H., and Rohde, D.W. (1983). Changes and continuity in the 1980 elections, rev. ed. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J.H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37: 246–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., and Kelley Jr., S. (1975). Determinants of participation in presidential elections. The Journal of Law and Economics 18: 695–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A., and Fiorina, M.P. (1974). The paradox of not voting: A decision theoretic analysis. American Political Science Review 68: 525–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.H. (1988). Passions within reason. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.E., and the National Election Studies. (1988). American national election study: Pre and post election survey. Conducted by the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. (1989). Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, S., and Traugott, M. (1992). Little white lies and social science models. Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 62: 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, B.D., Abramson, P.A., and Anderson, B.A. (1986). The presence of others and overreporting of voting in American national elections. Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 228–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, B.D., Anderson, B.A., and Abramson, P.A. (1986). Who overreports voting? American Political Science Review 80: 613–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A.M. (1974). Market signalling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Jay Coggins, Rick Harbaugh, Ron Johnson, Kate Krause and Doug Young for their help with this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harbaugh, W.T. If people vote because they like to, then why do so many of them lie?. Public Choice 89, 63–76 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114279

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114279

Keywords

Navigation