Skip to main content
Log in

Insect natural history, multi-species interactions and biodiversity in ecosystems

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The composition and dynamics of ecosystems are influenced by insects serving as providers, eliminators and facilitators across multiple trophic levels. The role of insects in ecosystems may be documented by manipulative field studies involving exclusion techniques applied to species that are decomposers, herbivores or predators. The presence or absence of insects is important to the distribution, abundance and diversity of plants and vertebrates, which typically are the premier species in conservation efforts. Thus, policy-making in environmental management programmes should consider the role of insects in ecosystems when establishing objectives and procedures for species conservation and biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, V.K., Jepson, M. and Gibson, C.W.D. (1988) Insect herbivory: effects on early old field succession demonstrated by chemical exclusion methods. Oikos 52, 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk, J.V. (1988) Interactive effects of dragonfly predation in experimental pond communities. Ecology 69, 857–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.E. and Newman, C.M. (1991) Dynamic basis of food web organization. Ecology 69, 1655–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1992) Must we shoot deer to save nature? Nat. Hist. 8, 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehler, L.E. and Miller, J.C. (1978) Biological control in temporary agroecosystems. Entomophaga 23, 207–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D.G. (1986) The role of forest insects and diseases in the Yellowstone ecosystem. West. Wildlands Fall 1986, 19–23.

  • Houston, D.C. (1987) The effect of ant predation on carrion insect communities in a Brazilian forest. Biotropica 19, 376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D.H. (1987) Insect diversity of a Costa Rican dry forest: why keep it and how? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 30, 343–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.B. (1984) Consequences of species introductions and removals on ecosystem function-implications for applied ecology. In Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds (E.E. Delfosse, ed.) pp. 27–56. Agriculture Canada.

  • Krantz, G.W. (1983) Mites as biological control agents of dung-breeding flies, with special reference to the Macrochelidae. In Research Needs for Development of Biological Control of Pests by Mites (M. Hoy, L. Knutson and Cunningham, eds) pp. 91–8. Berkley, CA: University of California Special Publication 3304.

  • Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E. and Roland, J. (1990) Critical Issues in Biological Control. Andover, Hants: Intercept Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, P., Cox, C. and Coombs, E. (1991) Successful biological control of ragwort, Senecio jacobaea, by introduced insects in Oregon. Ecol. Appl. 4, 430–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.C. (1980) Niche relationships among parasitic insects occurring in a temporary habitat. Ecol. 61, 270–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.C. (1990) Field assessment of the effects of a microbial pest control agent on nontarget Lepidoptera. Amer. Entomol. 36, 135–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.C. (1992) Effects of a microbial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki, on nontarget Lepidoptera in a spruce budworm-infested forest. J. Res. Lepidoptera 29, 267–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, P.J., Lawler, S.P. and Johnson, E.A. (1988) Competition between aquatic insects and vertebrates: interaction strength and higher order interactions. Ecology 69, 1401–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M.G. (1987) Changing attitudes to nature conservation: the entomological perspective. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32, 213–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T. and White, P.S., eds (1985) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch, S.J. and Carroll, C.R. (1982) Effect of a keystone predaceous ant, Solenopsis geminata, on arthropods in a tropical agroecosystem. Ecology 63, 1979–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallabanks, R. and Courtney, S.R. (1992) Frugivory, seed predation and insect-vertebrate interactions. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 37, 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways, M.J. (1989) Insect conservation and the disturbance landscape. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 27, 183–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenley, K., Beaver, R.A. and Heumier, T.A. (1991) On the trophic relations of insects: a food web approach. Amer. Nat. 137, 597–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schowalter, T.D. (1981) Insect herbivore relationship to the state of the host plant: biotic regulation of ecosystem nutrient cycling through ecological succession. Oikos 37, 126–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schowalter, T.D. (1985) Adaptations of insects to disturbance. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (S.T., Pickett and P.S., White, eds) pp. 235–52. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt, T.R. and CrossleyJr, D.A. (1984) The influence of arthropods on ecosystems. Bioscience 34, 157–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D.R., Lawton, J.H. and Southwood, R. (1984) Insects on Plants Community Patterns and Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.N. (1984) Insect diversity and the trophic structure of communities. In Ecological Entomology (C.B. Huffaker and R.L. Rabb, eds) pp. 591–605. Wiley and Sons.

  • Westman, W.E. (1990) Managing for biodiversity. Bioscience 40, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, J.C. Insect natural history, multi-species interactions and biodiversity in ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 2, 233–241 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056670

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056670

Keywords

Navigation