Skip to main content
Log in

Common and rare Swedish vertebrates — distribution and habitat preferences

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Data have been compiled on the distribution, habitat preferences and population sizes of 348 vertebrates reproducing in Sweden (excluding fish) and their species richness in different habitats and regions was investigated. Furthermore, we compared the habitat preferences and distribution of rare and common vertebrates. The relative species number (corrected for area) increases from the north (the hemiarctic/boreal zone) to the south (the temperate/hemiboreal zone). The relative number of species in major habitats is highest in farmland, lakes and running waters, and possibly also in the sea. However, the absolute number of species is highest in woodland, the dominant habitat in Sweden (56% of the land area excluding sea). Within woodlands, a large proportion of species occur in southern deciduous forests, in other deciduous forests and in mixed forests, while coniferous forests are less species-rich when the habitat area is taken into account. In farmland, the most species-rich habitats are meadows and forest edges, while marshes are the most species-rich habitats amongst lakes and running waters. Nationally rare species (<1000 individuals) have a smaller European range than common species, and they also have their European distribution centres further to the south than the common species. Of the species occurring in large parts of Sweden (that is, both in the north and the south) a low proportion (4.7%) are classified as rare compared with species occurring mainly in the north (20.6% rare) or mainly in the south (31.6% rare) of Sweden. There is a positive correlation between the number of rare species and the total species number in 41 subcategory habitats, and the proportion of rare species is similar in most habitats. A more detailed analysis (including effects of both regions and habitats) suggests that the proportion of rare species in a region is a result of differences between latitudes, but also of different habitats (when corrected for latitude effects). There are differences in the proportion of rare species between the nine most species-rich orders (for example, there is a high proportion of rare species in the order Carnivora and a low proportion in the order Rodentia), but the proportion of rare species in these orders is not independent of the habitats in which they occur, making it difficult to separate the effects of habitat preferences and taxonomy on rarity. The focusing of conservation work on relatively species-rich habitats in southern and middle Sweden — such as some farmland habitats (that is, meadows and forest edges), marshes (in connection with lakes and running waters) and forests with a relatively high proportion of deciduous trees — is of high priority if the conservation of biodiversity is a main goal. These are also the habitats with a high number of rare and red-listed species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlén, I. and Tjernberg, M. (1992) Artfakta. Sveriges Hotade och Sällsynta Vertebrater 1992 (Threatened and Rare Vertebrates in Sweden 1992). Uppsala: The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlén, I., Andrén, C. and Nilson, G. (1992) Sveriges Grodor, Ödlor och Ormar. (Swedish Frogs, Lizards and Snakes). Uppsala: Naturskyddsföreningen och Databanken för hotade arter. (In Swedish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L. and Jalas, J. (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in north-western Europe. Ann. Bot. Fennici 5, 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arita, H.T., Robinson, K.H. and Redford, K.H. (1990) Rarity in neotropical forest mammals and its ecological correlates. Conserv. Biol. 4, 181–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, L. (1993) Workshop A — report and conclusions. Pp. 52–7 in JNCC. Action for Biodiversity in the UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

  • Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M. and Weslien, J. (1994) Threatened plant, animal and fungi species in Swedish forests — distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8, 718–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M. and Weslien J. (in press) Threat factors, distribution and habitat associations in relation to threat levels of Red-listed species in Swedish forests. Conserv. Biol.

  • Bjärvall, A. and Ullström, S. (1985) Däggdjur. Alla Europas arter. (Mammals. All the species of Europe). Stockholm: Wahlström and Widstrand. (In Swedish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H. (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124, 255–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp, S. and Simmons, K.E.L. (eds) (1977–1993) The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Volumes 1–7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, G.B. (1978) The Mammals of the Palearctic Region. A taxonomic review. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnutt, J., Lockwood, J., Luh, H.-K., Nott, P. and Russel, G. (1994) Hotspots and biodiversity. Nature 367, 326–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry-Lindahl, K. (1985) Våra Fiskar. Havs- och Sötvattenfiskar i Norden och Övriga Europa (Sea- and fresh water fishes in the Nordic countries and Europe). Stockholm: Norstedts och söners förlag. (In Swedish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. (1984) ‘Normal’ extinctions of isolated populations. In Extinctions (M.H., Nitecki, ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A.G. (1960) Latitudinal variations in organic diversity. Evolution 14, 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, S. (1965) The borderland. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 50, 167–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, S.M. and Nudds, T.M. (1989) Insular biogeography of mammals in Canadian parks. J. Biogeogr. 16, 261–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götmark, F. and Nilsson, C. (1992) Criteria used for protection of natural areas in Sweden 1909–1986. Conserv. Biol. 6, 220–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge, B. (ed.) (1992) Global Biodiversity. Status of the Earth's living resources. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, L. (1994) A comparison of biological characteristics and distribution between Swedish threatened and non-threatened forest vascular plants. Ecography 17, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C. (1982) An Atlas of the Birds of the Western Palearctic. Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J.G. (1986) Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield flora. Part I: The identity, distribution and habitat characteristics of the common and rare species. Biol. Conserv. 36, 199–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J.G. (1993) Commonness and rarity in British butterflies. J. Appl. Ecol. 30, 407–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, E. (1971) Atlas över Växternas Utbredning i Norden (Distribution of vascular plants in the Nordic countries). Stockholm: Generalstaben. (In Swedish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M. (1993) Biological diversity, soils and economics. Science 262, 1676–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen, O. and Väisänen, R.A. (1978) Ecological zoogeography of North European waders, or why do so many waders breed in the north? Oikos 30, 496–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, M., Mace, G.M. and Williams, P.H. (in press) Threatened status, rarity and diversity as alternative selection measures for protected areas: a test using Afrotropical antilopes. Conserv. Biol.

  • Kershaw, M. (submitted) Species turnover patterns and the selection of priority areas for conservation. Ecol. Appl.

  • Koskimies, P. (1993) Population sizes and recent trends of breeding birds in the Nordic countries. Publications of Water and Environment Administrations, Series A144. Helsinki: National Board of Waters and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin, W.E. and Gaston, K.J. (1993) The biology of rarity: patterns, causes and consequences. TREE 8, 298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, R.C. and Bock, C.E. (1986) The correlation between range size and local abundance of some north American birds. Ecol. 67, 258–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, T., Kemppainen, E., Kurtto, A. and Uotila, P. (1986) Distribution and biological characteristics of threatened vascular plants in Finland. Biol. Conserv. 55, 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, T., Kurtto, A. and Väisänen, R.A. (1988) Floristic composition and regional species-richness of vascular plants in Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici 25, 281–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landres, P.B., Verner, J. and Thomas, J.W. (1988) Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv. Biol. 2, 316–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting representative networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niethammer, J. and Krapp, F. (1977–1993) Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Volumes 1–5. 093 Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, C. and Götmark, F. (1992) Protected areas in Sweden. Is natural variety adequately represented? Conserv. Biol. 6, 232–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4, 355–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Statistics of Sweden (1993) The Natural Environment. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J.G. (1988) On productivity as a predictor of rodent and carnivore diversity. Ecol. 69, 1161–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S.L., Jones, L.H. and Diamond, J. (1988) On the risk of extinction. Am. Nat. 132, 757–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C. and Gibbons, D.W. (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.R., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. TREE 8, 124–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, D. (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation (ed. Synge, H.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappoport, E.H., Borioli, G., Monjeau, J.E., Puntieri, J.E., Oviedo, R.D. (1986) The design of nature reserves: A simulation for assessing specific conservation value. Biol. Conserv. 37, 269–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W., Barber, C. and Miller, K. (1992) Global Biodiversity Strategy. Guidelines for action to save, study, and use Earth's biotic wealth and equitably. Washington, DC: WRI, IUCN and UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, K. (1992) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for primary cause. Oikos 65, 514–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T.W. (1987) The geographical distribution of rarity. Oecologia 74, 161–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjörs, H. (1965) Forest regions. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 50, 48–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveriges Ornitologists Förening (1990) Sveriges Fålgar (The birds of Sweden). 2:a uppl. Stockholm. (In Swedish.)

  • Soulé, M.E., Wilcox, B.A. and Holtby, C. (1979) Benign neglect: a model of faunal collapse in the game reserves of East Africa. Biol. Conserv. 15, 259–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I.F. (1992) Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statens Naturvårdsverk (1994) Biologisk Mångfald i Sverige. En landstudie. Monitor 14. Solna: Naturvårdsverkets förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Hunters Association (1992) Swedish Game. Biology and Management, Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. and Winter, B. (1980) Some causes of extinction. In Conservation Biology (M.E., Soulé and B.A., Wilcox, eds). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. and Winter, B. (1983) A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Columbia and Ecuador. Biol. Conserv. 27, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M.B. (ed.) (1986) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H. and Gaston, K.J. (1994) Measuring biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species-richness? Biol. Conserv. 67, 211–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E.O. (1974) Population and local extinctions of birds on Barro Colorado island, Panama. Ecol. Monogr. 50, 111–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, Å., Tjernberg, M. Common and rare Swedish vertebrates — distribution and habitat preferences. Biodivers Conserv 5, 101–128 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056294

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056294

Keywords

Navigation