Skip to main content
Log in

Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew Sphaerotheca macularis (Fr.)Jaczewski in the red raspberry, Rubus idaeus L.

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The varieties Lloyd George and Burnetholm (and probably Malling Promise) are heterozygous for three genes governing resistance to mildew (S. macularis (FR.) Jaczewski, syn. S. humuli (DC.) BUrr.), Sp 1 and Sp 2 being dominant complementaries and sp 3 recessive. Resistance whether of Sp 1, Sp 2 or sp 3 sp 3 origin is epistatic to susceptibility. Sp 3 is linked with the fruit colour gene T with a crossover value of ca. 25%, the gene order in this linkage group being B-Sx 3-T-Sp3.Evidence suggesting linkage between H (hairy canes) and resistance is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderman, W. H., Wilcox, A. N., and Weir, T. S., 1957. Fruit varieties developed at the Minnesota fruit breeding farm. Small fruits. Stn Bull. Min. agric. Exp. Stn, 441: 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. W., 1928. Diseases of fruit and nut crops in the United States in 1927. Pl. Dis. Reptr. Suppl., 60:117–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. B. and Lawrence, W. J. C., 1931. Inheritance of sex, colour and hairiness in the raspberry, Rubus idaeus L.. J. Genet. 24:243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. B. and Everhart, B. M., 1892. The North American Pyrenomycetes. Ellis and Everhart, Newfield, New Jersey, 793 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, A. H., 1965. Sphaerotheca humuli on Rubus henryi. Pl. Dis. Reptr. 49:814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, R. H., 1951. Comparison of fungicides for control of powdery mildew on the Latham red raspberry in 1950. Pl. Dis. Reptr. 35:538–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton R. H., 1960. Small fruit diseases in Michigan. Ext. Bull. Mich. St. Univ. coop. Ext. Serv. 370:75 pp.

  • Giddings, N. J. and Wood, J. I., 1925. Diseases of fruit and nut crops in the United States in 1924. Pl. Dis. Reptr Suppl. 39:64–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, G. and Paterson, E. B., 1966. Chromosome number of a sub-antarctic Rubus. Nature, Lond. 211:759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. W. S. and White, F. H., 1950. Breeding for disease resistance in Canada. III. Horticultural crops and tobacco. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 18:218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, D. L., 1961. Some evidence of the influence of the morphology of raspberry canes upon their liability to be attacked by certain fungi. Hort. Res. 1:100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, D. L., 1962. Some aspects of breeding for disease resistance in the raspberry. Proc. 16th Int. hort. Congr., Brussels, pp. 87–91.

  • Keep, E., 1964. Sepaloidy in the red raspberry, Rubus idaeus L. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 6:52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. B., 1960. Raspberries and blackberries in Ontario. III. Diseases. Publs Ont. Dept. Agric. 473:32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L., 1962a. Fruit breeding. Jl. R. hort. Soc. 87:103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L., 1962b. Heritable resistance to pests and diseases in fruit crops. Proc. 16th Int. hort. Congr., Brussels, pp. 99–104.

  • Knight, R. L. and Keep, E., 1958. Abstract bibliography of fruit breeding and genetics to 1955. Rubus and Ribes — A survey. Tech. Commun. Commonw. Bur. Hort. Plantn Crops 25:254 pp.

  • Knight, R. L. and Keep, E., 1966. Breeding new soft fruits. In: Fruit present and future. 21st Anniv. Vol. Fr. Group, R. hort. Soc., pp. 98–111.

  • Lewis, D., 1939. Genetical studies in the cultivated raspberries. I. Inheritance and linkage. J. Genet. 38:367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1940. Genetical studies in cultivated raspberries. II. Selective fertilization. Genetics 25: 278–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattrass, R. M., 1927. Economic mycology. Rep. Long Ashton Res. Stn. pp. 202–212.

  • Peterson, P. D. and Johnson, H. W., 1928. Powdery mildew of raspberry. Phytopathology 18:787–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, E. S., 1900. A monograph of the Erysiphaceae. Mem. Torrey bot. Club 9:292 pp.

  • Schwartze, C. D. and Myhre, A. S., 1953. The Puyallup red raspberry. Stn. Circ. Wash. agric. Exp. Stn 238:4 pp.

  • Slate, G. L. and Suit, R. F., 1944. A second report on the breeding of autumn-fruiting red raspberries. Proc. Am. Soc. hort. Sci. 44:283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slate, G. L., Braun, A. J. and Mundinger, F. G., 1953. Raspberry growing: culture, diseases and insects. Ext. Bull. Cornell agric. Exp. Stn 719:68 pp.

  • Spangelo, L. P. S., 1955. Raspberries. Prog. Rep. cent. Exp. Fm, Ottawa, 1949–53:26–28.

  • Spangelo, L. P. S., 1961. Raspberries. Prog. Rep. cent. Exp. Fm, Ottawa, 1954–8:21–22.

  • Swarbrick, T., 1930. A preliminary report of the raspberry variety trials at long Ashton. Rep. Long Ashton Res. Stn, pp. 27–45.

  • Wilhelm, S., Thomas, H. E. and Koch, E. C., 1951. Diseases of the loganberry. Calif. Agric. 5(1):11, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W. J. and Fulton, R. H., 1951. A field test of several fungicides for the control of powdery mildew on Lucretia dewberry in 1951. Pl. Dis. Reptr. 35:540–541.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keep, E. Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew Sphaerotheca macularis (Fr.)Jaczewski in the red raspberry, Rubus idaeus L.. Euphytica 17, 417–438 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056244

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056244

Keywords

Navigation