Skip to main content
Log in

The marginal value of job safety: A contingent valuation study

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article estimates the marginal value of safety based on contingent values obtained in a labor-market-oriented national random-sample mail survey. Thus, worker preferences for safety are assessed directly, in contrast to the hedonic price method that has been used almost exclusively in related studies. Key aspects of this article are that (1) contingent values are obtained for small changes in risks of job-related fatal accidentsperceived by respondents, and (2) relationships are analyzed between respondents' marginal safety values and their income, socioeconomic/demographic characteristics, union membership status, and initial levels of risk faced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brookshire, David S. & Coursey, Don L. Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures.American Economic Review (Vol. 77, No. 4, 1987), pp 554–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, Don L., Hovis, John J., & Schulze, William D. The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value.Quarterly Journal of Economics (Vol. 102, No. 2, 1987), pp 679–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Ronald G., Brookshire, David S., & Schulze, William D.Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, William H., Smith, V. Kerry, & Fisher, Ann. Option Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvements: A Contingent Valuation Study for the Monongahela River.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Vol. 14, No. 3, 1987), pp 248–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, William T. Differences Between Risk Premiums in Union and Nonunion Wages and the Case for Occupational Safety Regulation.American Economic Review (Vol. 74, No. 2, 1984), pp 320–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, Mark & Gerking, Shelby. Interregional Wage Differentials: An Equilibrium Perspective.Journal of Regional Science (1988), forthcoming.

  • Dillingham, Alan E. The Influence of Risk Variable Definition on Value-of-Life Estimates.Economic Inquiry (Vol. 23, No. 2, 1985), pp 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillingham, Alan E. & Smith, Robert S. Union Effects on the Valuation of Fatal Risk.Industrial Relations Research Association. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting, December 28–30, 1983, San Francisco, (1984), pp 270–277.

  • Dillman, Donald A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegax, Douglas, Gerking, Shelby, & Schulze, William. Perceived Risk and the Marginal Value of Safety. Manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegax, Douglas et al. Valuing Safety: Two Approaches. Volume IV in.Experimental Methods for Assessing Environmental Benefits. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.Econometrica (Vol. 47, No. 1, 1979), pp 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, Michael W. The Value of Changes in the Probability of Death or Injury.Journal of Political Economy (Vol. 82, 1974), pp 835–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M.W., Hammerton, M., & Philips, P.R. The Value of Safety: Results of a National Sample Survey.The Economic Journal (Vol. 95, No. 377, 1985), pp 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos. Prospect theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.Econometrica (Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979), pp 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos. Choices, Values, and Frames.American Psychologist (Vol. 39, No. 4, 1984), pp 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, Jack L. & Sinden, J.A. Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value.The Quarterly Journal of Economics (Vol. 99, No. 3, 1984), pp 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. et al. Judged Frequency of Lethal Events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory (Vol. 4, No. 6, 1978), pp 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Alan & Psacharopoulos, George. The Reward for Risk in the Labor Market: Evidence from the United Kingdom and a Reconciliation with Other Studies.Journal of Political Economy (Vol. 90, No. 4, 1982), pp 827–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Craig A. An Analysis of Wage Differentials Received by Workers on Dangerous Jobs.Journal of Human Resources (Vol. 16, No. 2, 1981), pp 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, Robert D. & Chestnut, Lauraine G. Valuing Changes in Morbidity: WTP Versus COI Measures. Manuscript, Energy and Resource Consultants, Inc., Boulder, CO, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. Kerry & Desvousges, William H. An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes.Journal of Political Economy (Vol. 95, No. 1, 1987), pp 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Robert S. Compensating Wage Differentials and Public Policy: A Review.Industrial and Labor Relations Review (Vol. 32, No. 3, 1979), pp 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard & Rosen, Sherwin. The Value of Saving a Life: Evidence from the Labor Market. In: Nestor E., Terleckyj, ed.,Household Production and Consumption. New York: Columbia University Press for NBER, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip. Labor Market Valuations of Life and Limb: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications.Public Policy (Vol. 26, No. 3, 1978), pp 359–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip.Employment Hazards: An Investigation of Market Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip.Risk By Choice: Regulating Health and Safety in the Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip & O'Connor, Charles J. Adaptive Responses to Chemical Labeling: Are Workers Bayesian Decision Makers?American Economic Review (Vol. 74, No. 5, 1984), pp 942–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, Magat, Wesley, & Huber, Joel. An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks,Rand Journal of Economics (Vol. 18, No. 4, 1987).

  • Weinstein, Milton C., Shepard, Donald S., & Pliskin, Joseph S. The Economic Value of Changing Mortality Probabilities: A Decision-Theoretic Approach.Quarterly Journal of Economics (Vol. 94, No. 2, 1980), pp 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, John D. & Butler, Richard J. Health Conditions and Job Hazards: Union and Nonunion Jobs.Journal of Labor Research (Vol. 4, No. 4, 1983), pp 339–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in the U.S., By Industry, 1984. Bulletin 2259. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

University of Wyoming

University of Wyoming

University of Colorado-Boulder

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerking, S., De Haan, M. & Schulze, W. The marginal value of job safety: A contingent valuation study. J Risk Uncertainty 1, 185–199 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056167

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056167

Key words

Navigation