Skip to main content
Log in

On the interpretation of principal components analysis in ecological contexts

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Principal components analysis is well suited for many data analysis problems in ecology, particularly for data reduction and hypothesis generation; but the structure of PCA is poorly suited for indirect gradient analysis. Whatever the intended application of PCA, the user must exercise special care in selecting data transformations to prevent the analysis from being overwhelmed by the purely numerical effects in the variance structure of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, M. P. 1968. An ordination study of a chalk grassland community. J. Ecol. 56: 739–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassie, R. M. 1963. Multivariate analysis in the interpretation of numerical plankton data. N.Z.J. Sci. 6: 36–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassie, R. M. 1972. Fauna and sediments of an intertidal mudflat: an alternative multivariate analysis. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 9: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassie, R. M. & A. D. Michael. 1968. Fauna and sediments of an intertidal mud-flat: a multivariate analysis. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M. B. 1975. On objectives of methods of ordination. Vegetatio 30: 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch Jr., H. G. & R. H. Whittaker. 1972. Comparison of ordination techniques. Ecol. 53: 868–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch Jr., H. G., R. H. Whittaker & T. R. Wentworth. 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. (in press).

  • Goff, F. C. 1975. Comparison of species ordinations resulting from alternative indices of interspecific association and different numbers of included species. Vegetatio 31: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. W. 1954. Objective methods in the classification of vegetation. III. An essay on the use of factor analysis. Aust. J. Bot. 2: 304–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. W. 1970. Statistical plant ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F. C. 1971. Ordinations of habitat relationships among breeding birds. Wilson Bull. 83: 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessell, S. R. & R. H. Whittaker. 1976. Comparisons of three ordination techniques. Vegetatio 32: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. F. 1967. Multivarlate Statistical Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York. 338 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. 1977. Phytoplankton species relationships at short time scales. (in preparation).

  • Noy-Meir, I., 1971. Data transformations in ecological ordination. I. Some advantages of non-centering. J. Ecol. 61: 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I., D. Walker & W. T. Williams. 1975. Data transformations in ecological ordination. II. On the meaning of data standardization. J. Ecol. 63: 779–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. & R. H. Whittaker. 1977. Recent developments in continuous multivariate techniques. In: R. H. Whittaker (ed.). Ordination of Plant Communities. Junk, The Hague. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1966. Geometric models in ecology. I. The theory and application of some ordination methods. J. Ecol. 54: 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1974. On information flow in ordination. Vegetatio 19: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New York, 286 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarranton, G. A. 1967. Principal components analysis of data from saxicolous bryophyte vegetation at Steps Bridge, Devon. Can. J. Bot. 45: 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank R. H. Whittaker, H. G. Gauch, R. E. Moeller, and S. R. Searle for their guidance and assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nichols, S. On the interpretation of principal components analysis in ecological contexts. Vegetatio 34, 191–197 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055215

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055215

Keywords

Navigation