Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of thickness on the fracture characteristics of fetal membranes

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The mechanical characteristics of the chorioamniotic membrane were evaluated with a new burst test apparatus by rupturing 35 specimens that were taken from a sample of seven afterbirths. ‘Strength’, ‘stiffness’, ‘toughness’, and ‘ductility’ were measured. Mechanical characteristics did not change significantly with variation in thickness. While ductility should not correlate with thickness, the lack of a significant increase in strength, stiffness and toughness with an increase in thickness is most unusual and requires an explanation. Subsequently, an additional experiment, which was designed to ascertain the mechanical stability of membrane specimens with prolonged exposure to air, showed a dramatic increase in stiffness as membranes were allowed to dry. The increase in stiffness indicates that strength and toughness also increase with drying, provided that ductility remains constant. Thus, the degree of hydration of the membrane, which is reflected in thickness, regulates mechanical characteristics. The increase in the water content of certain amniotic layers has a lubricating effect on the amnion-chorion interface. This lubrication increases as term approaches. Thus, hydration must increase as gestation progresses, and strength, stiffness, and toughness must decrease until the membrane is weak enough to rupture at the end of gestation. Thus, hydration must increase as gestation progresses, and strength, stiffness, and toughness must decrease until the membrane is weak enough to rupture at the end of gestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. P.Embrey, J. Obst. Gyn. Brit. Empire 61 (1956) 793.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Z.Polishuk, S.Kohane and A.Periano, Obstet. Gynecol. 20 (1962) 204.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. B.MacLachlan, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 91 (1965) 309.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. K.Toppozada, N. A.Sallam, A. A.Gaafar and K. M.El-Kashlan, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 108 (1970) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.Parry-Jones and S.Priya, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol 83 (1976) 205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.Artal, R. J.Sokol, M.Neuman, A. H.Burstein and J.Stojkov, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 125 (1976) 655.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. P.Lavery and C. E.Miller, Obstet. Gynecol. 50 (1977) 467.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. P.Lavery and C. E.Miller, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 134 (1979) 366.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. S.Al-Zaid and M. N.Bou-Resli, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 87 (1980) 227.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. J.Sbarra, G. B.Thomas, C. L.Cetrulo, C.Shark, A.Chaudhury and B.Paul, Obstet. Gynecol. 70 (1981) 107.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. A.Hills and D. B.Cotton, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 149 (1984) 896.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. N.Schoonmaker, D. W.Lawellin, B.Lunt and J. A.McGregor, Obstet. Gynecol. 74 (1989) 590.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.K. A.Reinbold, Thesis Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. C.Peng R. P.Kusy, P. F.Hirsch and J. R.Hagaman, Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 12 (1988) 655.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. P.Eylers and A. R.Greenberg, J. Exp. Biol. 143 (1989) 71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. R.Greenberg and J. P.Eylers, J. Biomechanics 17 (1984) 161.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. L.Bourne, ‘The human amnion and chorion’ (Lloy-Lake London, 1962) pp. 4, 175.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. E.Nimni and R. D.Harkness in “Collage”, Vol. 1, edited by M. E.Nimni (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1988) pp. 39, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. A.Wainright, W. D.Biggs, J. D.Currey and J. M.Gosline, in “Mechanical design in organisms” (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1982) p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.Petry, Zbl. Gynaek. 17 (1954) 655.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T.Murayama, in “Dynamic mechanical analysis of polymeric material” (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1978) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schober, E.A., Kusy, R.P., Whitley, J.Q. et al. Effect of thickness on the fracture characteristics of fetal membranes. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 5, 130–137 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053332

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053332

Keywords

Navigation