Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The increasing incidence of breast cancer since 1982: relevance of early detection

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Breast cancer incidence in the United States has been rising dramatically since 1982, as shown in data collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. In women aged 50 and older, incidence rates for in situ and localized invasive tumors have increased over the period 1982–86, while rates for regional and distant tumors have remained stable. The incidence of localized tumors <1.0 cm, 1.0–1.9 cm, and 2.0–2.9 cm in size has increased more rapidly than that of tumors 3.0 cm or more in size among women over age 50. Survival rates also have improved among cases diagnosed over this time period. These data suggest that early detection may be playing a role in the recent increase in female breast cancer incidence, though other factors cannot be ruled out. Conclusions regarding improved cancer control await confirmation by reduced breast cancer mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Cancer Statistics Review 1973–1987. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1990; NIH Pub. No. 90–2789.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horm JW. An overview of female breast cancer. In: Engstrom PF, Rimer B, Mortenson LE, eds. Advances in Cancer Control: Screening and Prevention Research. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc., 1990: 217–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devesa SS, Pollack ES, Young JLJr. Assessing the validity of observed cancer incidence trends. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 274–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five-year summary report. Ca-Cancer J Clinicians 1982; 32: 194–225.

    Google Scholar 

  5. US Department of Health and Human Services. 1987 Annual Cancer Statistics Review: Including Cancer Trends: 1950–1985. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1988; NIH Pub. No. 88–2789.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frome EL. The analysis of rates using poisson regression models. Biometrics 1983; 39: 665–74.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Little RJA, Pullum TW. The general linear model and direct standardization: A comparison. Sociol Methods Res 1979; 7: 475–501.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hudson DJ: Fitting segmented curves whose join points have to be estimated. J Amer Statist Assoc 1966; 61: 1097–129.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lerman PM. Fitting segmented regression models by grid search. Appl Statist 1980; 29: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards AWF. Likelihood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petrakis NL, Ernster VL, King M. Breast. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JFJr., eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1982: 855–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas LB, Ackerman LV, McDivitt RW, Hanson TAS, Hankey BF, Prorok PC. Report of the NCl ad hoc pathology working group to review the gross and microscopic findings of breast cancer cases in the HIP study. JNCI 1977; 59: 497–541.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1980; 70–117.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seidman H, Gelb SK, Silverberg E, LaVerda N, Lubera JA. Survival experience in the breast cancer detection demonstration project. Ca-Cancer J Clinicians 1987; 37: 258–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. US Department of Health and Human Services. US Decennial Life Tables for 1979–81: Vol 1, No 1: United States Life Tables. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1985; DHHS Pub. No. (PHS)85–1150–1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. White EW, Lee CY, Kristal AR. Evaluation of the increase in breast cancer incidence in relation to mammography use. JNCI 1990; 82: 1546–52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roush GC, Holford TR, Schymura MJ, White C. Cancer Risk and Incidence Trends: The Connecticut Perspective. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1987: 223–38.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hahn RA, Moolgavkar SH. Nulliparity, decade of birth, and breast cancer in Connecticut cohorts, 1855 to 1945: An ecological study. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 1503–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doll R, Peto R. The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the United States Today. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Devesa SS, Silverman DT. Cancer incidence and mortality trends in the United States: 1935–74. JNCI 1978; 60: 545–71.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 1989 Survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. Ca-Cancer J Clinicians 1990; 40: 77–101.

  23. Chow WH, Liff JM, Greenberg RS. Mammography in Atlanta. J Med Assoc GA 1987; 76: 788–92.

    Google Scholar 

  24. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Breast cancer screening for Medicare beneficiaries: Effectiveness, costs to Medicare and medical resources required. Unpublished staff paper, November, 1987.

  25. Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: An untealized potential. Ca-Cancer J Clinicians 1987; 37: 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dawson DA, Thompson GB. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Screening: United States, 1987. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1989; Vital Health Stat 10(172).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shapiro S, Venet W, Sttax P, Venet L., Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. JNCI 1982; 69: 349–55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Collette HJA, Day NE, Rombach JJ, De Waard F. Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet 1984; i: 1224–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R, Mravunae M, Sturmans F, Day NE. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975–1981. Lancet 1984; i: 1222–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baker LH, Chin DY, Wagner KV. Progress in screening for early breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 1985; 30: 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Lancet 1985; i: 829–32.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kessler LG, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the breast cancer burden to American women: 1990–2000. Presented at the Workshop on Antiestrogen Prevention of Breast Cancer, Madison, Wisconsin: October 1989.

  33. McWhorter WP, Eyre HJ. Impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer diagnosis. JNCI 1990; 82: 153–4.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Fraumeni JFJr. Declining breast cancer mortality among young American women. JNCI 1987; 78: 451–4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. White E. Projected changes in breast cancer incidence due to the trend toward delayed childbearing. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 495–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pike MC, Henderson BE, Krailo MD, Duke A, Roy S. Breast cancer in young women and use of oral contraceptives: Possible modifying effect of formulation and age at use. Lancet 1983; ii: 926–30.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McPherson K, Neil A, Vessey MP, Doll R. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Lancet 1983; ii: 1414–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Meirik O, Lund E, Adami HO, Bergstrom R. Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer in young women. A joint national case-control study in Sweden and Norway. Lancet 1986; ii: 650–4.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McPherson K, Vessey MP, Neil A, Doll R, Jones L, Roberts M. Early contraceptive use and breast cancer: Results of another case-control study. Br J Cancer 1987; 56: 653–60.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kay CR, Hannaford PC. Oral contraceptives and the pill—A further report from the Royal College of General Practitioners' oral contraception study. Br J Cancer 1988; 58: 675–80.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stadel BV, Lai S, Schlesselman JJ, Murray P. Oral contraceptives and premenopaual breast cancer in nulliparous women. Contraception 1988; 38: 287–99.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Miller DR, Rosenberg L, Kaufman DW, Stolley P, Warshauer ME, Shapiro S. Breast cancer before age 45 and oral contraceptive use: new findings. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 269–80.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Olsson H, Moller TR, Ranstam J. Early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer among premenopausal women: Final report from a study in southern Sweden. JCNI 1989; 81: 1000–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stadel BV, Schlesselman JJ. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Lancet 1986; ii: 922–3.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Paul C, Skegg DC, Spears GF, Kaldor JM. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer: a national study. Br Med J 1986; 293: 723–6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Miller DR, Rosenberg L, Kaufman DW, Schottennfeld D, Stolley PD, Shapiro S. Breast cancer risk in relation to early oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 863–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surveillance Program, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, USA

    Barry A. Miller, Eric J. Feuer & Benjamin F. Hankey

Authors
  1. Barry A. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric J. Feuer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin F. Hankey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, B.A., Feuer, E.J. & Hankey, B.F. The increasing incidence of breast cancer since 1982: relevance of early detection. Cancer Causes Control 2, 67–74 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053123

Key words

Search

Navigation