Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro screening procedure for osmotic tolerance in Prunus

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant growth differences (p≤<0.01) were observed for two micropropagated Prunus accessions after 14 days in culture when 685 mM mannitol was included in Quoirin and Lepoivre nutrient medium. While there was an 11% growth increase in fresh weight during the 28-day culture period for accession K537-067, explants from New Jersey Plumcot No. 3 increased fresh weight an average of 123%. Similar tests were conducted to determine the repeatability of this short term in vitro screening procedure. Explants of Mananna 2624 were subjected to two levels of mannitol, 275 mM and 550 mM, included in the Quoirin and Lepoivre nutrient medium. Three successive 28-day tests were conducted. Explants were examined at both 14 and 28 days after the onset of the experiment for net growth changes. Addition of mannitol to the nutrient medium at concentrations of 275 mM and 550 mM decreased explant fresh weights of Marianna 2624 to 36% and 28% of controls, respectively, at 28 days past initial culture. Initial fresh weight and fresh weight changes at day 14 were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) between tests. No significant differences existed between tests with regard to weight changes at 28 days past initial culture. This information may aid Prunus breeders in the choice of procedures for inducing drought stress and screening large numbers of plant accessions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

K5:

K537-067

M2624:

Marianna 2624

NJPC3:

New Jersey Plumcot No. 3

Q & L:

Quoirin and Lepoivre

References

  • Blum A (1988) Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DS (1952) The effects of irrigation on flower bud development and fruiting in the apricol. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 61: 119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanizza G, Ricciardi L & Bagnulo C (1991) Leaf greenness measurements to evaluate water stressed genotypes in Vitis vinifera. Euphytica 55: 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber MF, Young E & Faust M (1983) Effects of PEG-induced water stress on calcium uptake in peach seedlings. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108: 737–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson AH & Veihmeyer FJ (1950) Irrigation experiments with apricots. Proc Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 55: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Huettel RN & Hammerschlag FA (1986) Influence of cytokinin on in vitro screening of peaches for resistance to nematodes. Plant Dis. 70: 1141–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizek DT (1981) Introduction. Proceedings of ASHS workshop on adaptation to water stress in plants. Hort Science 16: 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Laferriere JE (1992) Cultural and environmental response to drought among the Mountain Pima. Ecol. Food Nutr. 28: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankes C & Zimmerman RH (1990) Impact of osmotic potential on in vitro cultures of apple. Acta Hort 280: 417–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson KD & DeJong TM (1988) Physiological and growth responses of mature peach trees to postharvest water stress. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113: 296–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd GB & McCown BH (1980) Commerially feasible micro-propagation of mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) by use of shoot tip culture. Comb. Proc. Intl Plant Propagators' Soc. 30: 421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochatt SJ & Power JB (1988) Selection for salt/drought tolerance using isolated protoplasts and protoplast derived calli of ‘Colt’ cherry. Curr. Plant Sci. Biotechnol Agr. 7: 391–392

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole JC & Cruz RT (1980) Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress. Plant Physiol. 65: 428–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar MT & Moore RP (1968) Carbowax 6000, mannitol, and sodium chloride for simulating drought conditions in germination studies of corn (Zea mays L.) of strong and weak vigor. Agron. J. 60: 192–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Quoirin M & Lepoivre P (1977) Improved media for in vitro culture of Prunus sp. Acta. Hort. 78: 437–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajashekar GM (1993) In vitro screening of Prunus germplasm for drought tolerance. M.S. Thesis. California State University, Fresno, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney TG, Bassuk NL & Whitlow TH (1991) Osmotic adjustment and solute constituents in leaves and roots of water-stressed cherry (Prunus) trees. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 684–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger M & Duemmel MJ (1992) Comparison of drought resistance among Prunus species from divergent habitats. Tree Physiol. 11: 369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibli RA, Smith MAL & Spomer LA (1992) Osmotic adjustment and growth responses of three Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat, cultivars to osmotic stress induced in vitro. J. Plant Nutr. 15: 1373–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1989) SAS/STAT® Users Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition, Volume 1, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippett J, McNair T, Radenz R & Nelson D (1992) California Fruit and Nut Acreage. California Agricultural Statistics Service. Sacramento, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriu K (1963) Effect of post-harvest soil moisture depletion on subsequent field of apricots. Proc. Amer Soc. Hort. Sci: 84: 93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous MK, Miller FR & Rosenow DT (1991) Evaluation of visual rating scales for green leaf retention in sorghum. Crop. Sci. 31: 1691–1694

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1987) SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright LN & Dobrenz AK (1970) Efficiency of water use and seedling drought tolerance of Boer lovegrass Eragrostis curvula Nees. Crop. Sci. 10: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajashekar, G., Palmquist, D. & Ledbetter, C.A. In vitro screening procedure for osmotic tolerance in Prunus . Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 41, 159–164 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051585

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051585

Key words

Navigation