Abstract
Medicine's inability to humanely respond to the concerns of its patients has often been attributed to its Cartesian dualism of mind and body. More recently, this inability has been ascribed to medicine's penchant for isolating biological disease as its sole proper concern to the exclusion of experienced illness. This dualism of disease and illness is claimed to be an outgrowth of the Cartesian dualism but the differences and similiarities between these two forms of dualism is not clear. This paper seeks to clarify their relationship through an examination of their historical origins.
Disease is currently identified and characterized by a process of clinico-pathological correlation. By this means clinical impressions are corrected in light of autopsy findings. Our current mode of clinico-pathological correlation originated in Paris in the early nineteenth century with the work of Xavier Bichat and others. The theory of knowledge implicit within this clinico-pathological approach to the body is described and compared to that of Descartes. Though medicine does pursue certain Cartesian goals for knowledge, such as knowledge of the patient that does not rely upon his candor, it ultimately espouses neither a Cartesian theory of knowledge nor a Cartesian theory of the body. With pathological inquiry modeled after the autopsy as the final word in the identification and characterization of disease, the patient's capacity for self-knowledge and interpretation — not an entity called mind — is isolated away from his body. This approach to the body means that objective evidence of disease is valued to the exclusion of subjective evidence.
If the shortcomings of modern biomedicine are to be effectively addressed, not only must the interdependence of disease and illness be acknowledged. The very canons of medical evidence must be revised. Subjective evidence must be rehabilitated and rejuvenated with better methods of subjective clinical investigation. Host factors relevant to the healing and knowing of sickness must be elucidated so that medicine may rediscover the sentience of its patients. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackernecht, Erwin H. 1967 Medicine at the Paris Hospital: 1794–1848. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Bichat, Xavier 1813 Treatise on Membranes in General. Translated by John G. Coffin. Boston: Cummings and Hilliard.
1822 Anatomie Generale, transl. as General Anatomy: Applied to Physiology and Medicine. Translated by George Hayward. Boston: Richardson and Lord.
1827 Pathological Anatomy: The last Course of Xavier Bichat, from an autographic manuscript of R. A. Beclard. Translated by Joseph Tonego. Philadelphia: John Grigg.
Brody, Howard 1980 Placebos and the Philosophy of Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cassell, Eric 1976 The Healer's Art. New York: J. B. Lippincott.
Descartes, Rene 1911a Discourse on Method. In Philosophical Works, Vol. 1. Translated by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1911b Meditations on First Philosophy. In Philosophical Works, Vol. 1. Translated by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1972 Treatise on Man. Translated by Thomas Steele Hall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dubos, Rene 1965 Man Adapting. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Eisenberg, Leon and Kleinman, Arthur 1981 Clinical Social Sciences. In L. Eisenberg and A. Kleinman (eds.): The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co.; pp. 1–27.
Entralgo, Pedro Lain 1948 Sensualism and Vitalism in Bichat's Anatomie Generale. Jour Hist Med 3:4764.
Foucault, Michael 1973 The Birth of the Clinic. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.
Haigh, Elizabaeth 1975 The Roots of the Vitalism of Xavier Bichat. Bull Hist Med. 49:82–86.
Hastings, Arthur C., Fademan, James, and Gordon, James 1980 Health for the Whole Person. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Katon, Wayne and Kleinman, Arthur, 1981 Doctor-Patient negotiation and Other Social Science Strategies in Patient Care. In L. Eisenberg and A. Kleinman (eds.): The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co.; pp. 259–279.
King, Lester 1978 The Philosophy of Medicine: The Early Eighteenth Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
1982 Medical Thinking. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kleinman, Arthur 1975 Explanatory Models in Health Care Relationships. In Health of the Family. Washington, D.C.: National Council for International Health; pp. 159–172.
1980 Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press; pp. 259–286.
1982 Clinically Applied Anthropology on a Psychiatric Consultation-liason Service. In Noel J. Christman and Thomas W. Maretski (ed.): Clinically Applied Anthropology. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co.; pp. 82–116.
Long, Edmond R. 1928 A History of Pathology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co.
Mettler, Cecilia B. 1948 History of Medicine. Philadelphia: The Blakeston Co.
Pelletier, Kenneth R. 1979 Holistic Medicine: From Stress to Optimum Health. New York: Dell Publ. Co.
Reiser, Stanley Joel 1978 Medicine and the Rise of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Temkin, Oswei 1977 The Double Face of Janus. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Thayer, W. S., 1903 Bichat. Bull Johns Hopkins 14: 198–201.
Williams, Bernard 1978 Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Harmondsworth, Meddlesex, England: Penguin Books
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sullivan, M. In what sense is contemporary medicine dualistic?. Cult Med Psych 10, 331–350 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049269
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049269