Skip to main content
Log in

A laboratory-based method to measure relative pesticide and spray oil efficacy against broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks)(Acari: Tarsonemidae)

  • Mite
  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six pesticides and two spray oils were tested against Polyphagotarsonemus latus. The chemicals were evaluated under laboratory conditions, requiring the development of a novel bioassay method, which is reported here. The pesticide toxicities fell into three distinct groups, namely abamectin, conventional pesticides and oils. The relative pesticide toxicities at the LC50 level were abamectin 4.9×10-8 g ai l-1, endosulfan 1.1×10-3 g ai l-1, fenpyroximate 2.3×10-3 g ai l-1, pyridaben 4.1×10-3 g ai l-1, tebufenpyrad 4.4×10-3 g ai l-1, dicofol 4.5×10-3 g ai l-1, petroleum spray oil 3.4×10-1 g ai l-1 and canola oil 4.1×10-1 g ai l-1. The calculation of the LC99.9 values allows for resistance monitoring in P. latus and the suggested discriminating concentrations are abamectin 1.0×10-4 g ai l-1; endosulfan, pyridaben and dicofol 1.0×10-1 g ai l-1 fenpyroximate and tebufenpyrad 5.0×10-1 g ai l-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Busvine, J.R. 1971. A Critical Review of the Techniques for Testing Insecticides. CAB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busvine, J.R. 1980. Recommended Methods for Measurement of Pest Resistance to Pesticides. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper, 21, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.M., Scott, J.G., Campos, F. and Bloomquist, J.R. 1994. Resistance to avermectins: extent, mechanisms, and management implications. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 40: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A. 1990. Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, V., Cranham, J.E., Jeppson, L.R. and Helle, W. 1980. Revised method for spider mites and their eggs (e.g. Tetranychus spp. and Panonychus ulmi Koch. Recommended methods for measurement of pest resistance to pesticides, J R.Busvine (ed.), pp. 49–53. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 21, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggin, G. 1993. Cyclodiene Insecticide Use in Australia. Final Draft Report of the Chairman of the National Health and Medical Research Council Working Party.

  • Edge, V.E. and James, D.G. 1982. Detection of cyhexatin resistance in twospotted mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae) in Australia. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc., 21: 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, P. 1995. Probit 5 for Windows. In The Australian Entomological Society 26th AGM and Scientific Conference, p. 38. Farrer Memorial Agricultural High School, Tamworth, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, U. 1992. Biology and control of the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acari: Tarsonemidae). Exp. App. Acarol. 13: 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R.J. 1993. Structure and general properties of mineral and vegetable oils used as spray adjuvants. Pest. Sci., 37: 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hely, P.C., Pasfield, G. and Gellately, J.G. 1982. Insect Pests of fruit and vegetables in NSW. Inkata Press, Melbourne. 312 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herron, G.A. and Rophail, J. 1994. Responses of Tetranychus urticae Koch to canola oil (Synertrol®). Gen. Appl. Entomol. 26: 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herron, G.A., Beattie, G.A.C., Parkes, R.A. and Barchia, I. 1995. Potter spray tower bioassay of selected citrus pests to petroleum spray oil. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc., 34: 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugon, R. and Chaupin, P. 1986. Lutte contre Polyphagotarsonemus latus Banks ravageur des agrumes aux Antilles. Fruits, 41: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H. and Baker, E.W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasota, J.A. and Dybas, R.A. 1991. Avermectins, a novel class of compounds: implications for use in arthropod pest control. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 36: 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmeer, W.P.J. 1985. Toxicological methods. In World crop pests — spider mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol. B, W.Helle and M.W.Sabelis (eds), pp. 183–189. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña, J.E. 1988. Chemical control of broad mites (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) in limes (Citrus latifolia). Proc. Florida State Horticult. 101: 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peskem® PC 1994. Version 1.1. Centre for Pesticide Application and Safety, University of Queensland, Gatton College, Lawes.

  • Riehl, L.A. and LaDue, J.P. 1952. Evaluation of petroleum fractions against California red scale and citrus red mite. Adv. Chem. Ser. 7: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J.L., Smith, K.C., Savin, N.E. and Lavigne, R. 1984. Effects of dose selection and sample size on the precision of lethal dose estimates in dose-mortality regression. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 833–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, A.V., Peidrathita, J., Valderrama, R. and Galvez, G. 1978. Biologica, dano y control del acaro tropical Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) en frijol. Turrialba, 28: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassayre, M. 1986. Chemical control of the mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) in cotton fields. Cotton et Fibres Tropicales 41: 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herron, G., Jiang, L. & Spooner-Hart, R. A laboratory-based method to measure relative pesticide and spray oil efficacy against broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks)(Acari: Tarsonemidae). Exp Appl Acarol 20, 495–502 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048282

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048282

Key words

Navigation