Skip to main content
Log in

Seaweed research and utilization in Chile: moving into a new phase

  • 1. Plenary lecture
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two phases have been distinguished classically in the history of Latin American phycological research: the explorer phase characterized by the taxonomic work of mainly European and North American scientists, and the diversification phase marked by the establishment of resident scientists in the area and the training of a new generation of phycologists in subjects other than taxonomy. Over the last 15 years, Chile has entered a third phase, characterized by a significant increase in scientific and economic activity centered around seaweeds. Seaweed cultivation has been commercialized; raw materials are now locally processed and economic returns have more than tripled. In addition, some groups of opportunistic seaweed gatherers have become farmers. Loosely correlated with the above developments has been a significant increase in the number of scientific and technological studies related to seaweeds, in the number of professional phycologists and in the specialization of the various groups. This study first describes these new developments and the conceptual advances achieved in farming and resource management. It also emphasizes some socio-economic differences with seaweed farming in other countries and explores the level of interaction between the local scientific and productive sectors in view of future developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ang, P., 1987. Use of projection matrix model in the assessment of harvesting strategies for Sargassum. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 12: 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila, M. & M. Seguel, 1993. An overview of seaweed resources in Chile. J. appl. Phycol. 5: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila, M., M. Seguel, H. Plaza, E. Bustos & R. Otaíza, 1994. Estado de situación y perspectivas de la acuicultura en Chile. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Informe SGI-IFOP 91/1: 1–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cereceda, L. E. & G. Wormald, 1991. Privatization of the sea for seaweed production in Chile. Nature and Resources 27: 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H., 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M. S., 1973. Eucheuma farming for carrageenan. Micronesica 9: 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M. S., 1978. Eucheuma-current marine agronomy. In R. W. Krauss (ed.), The Marine Plant Biomass of the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon: 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M. S., 1979. Status of marine agronomy, with special reference to the Tropics. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 8: 350–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M. S., 1982. The diversified farming of coral reefs. Harold L. Lyon Arboretum Lectures, 11: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, M. S., 1983. Coral reef diversified farming. In C. K. Tseng (ed.), Proceedings of the Joint China-U.S. Phycological Symposium. Science Press, Beijing, China: 437–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. S. & D. C. Barilotti, 1990. An approach to determining the ecological effects of seaweed harvesting: a summary. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 13: 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanisak, M. D., M. M. Littler & D. S. Littler, 1990. Application of the functional-form model to the culture of seaweeds. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 13: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, M. M. & D. S. Littler, 1980. The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: field and laboratory test of a functional form model. Am. Nat. 116: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopehandía, J. & B. Santelices, 1981. Chilean seaweed resources: A quantitative review of potential and present utilization. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 725–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzi, J., M. E. Boisier & R. Jarufe, 1995. Vínculo entre el sector científico y el sector empresarial en el área de las algas marinas. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT), Departamento de Estudios, Serie Estudios N ° 27: 1–49.

  • McLachlan, J., 1982. The seaweed industry: an appraisal of resource management and cultivation, especially as related to the extractive industry. Monografías Biológicas 2: 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J., 1985. Macroalgae (seaweeds): Industrial resources and their utilization. Plant and Soil 89: 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neushul, M., 1972. Functional interpretation of benthic marine algal morphology. In I. A. Abbott & M. Kurogi (eds), Contributions to the Systematics of Benthic Marine Algae of Northeastern Pacific. Japanese Society of Phycologists, Kobe, Japan: 47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, E. C. de, 1981. Marine phycology and exploitation of seaweeds in South America. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 10: 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R., 1992. Food webs analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength. Nature 355: 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizarro, A. & H. Barrales, 1986. Field assessment of two methods for planting the agar-containing seaweed, Gracilaria, in northern Chile. Aquaculture 59: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizarro, A. & B. Santelices, 1993. Environmental variation and large-scale Gracilaria production. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 14: 357–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poblete, A. & I. Inostroza, 1987. Management of Gracilaria natural bed in Lenga, Chile: A case study. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 12: 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poblete, A., A. Candia & C. Veloso, 1991. Dinámica de producción de una pradera natural de Gracilaria Greville sometida a plan de manejo. Revista chilena de Historia Natural 64: 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, J. D. & R. E. Semple,1984. Drag rake harvesting intensity in Irish moss (Chondrus crispus Stack.) beds in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 11: 342–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, J. C., 1987. A survey of the Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Agardh stocks on the east coast of Tasmania. Technical Report N ° 21, Department of Sea Fisheries, Tasmania, 11 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B., 1979. Estado actual y necesidad de desarrollo de las investigaciones ficológicas en Chile. In B. Santelices (ed.), Actas del Primer Simposio sobre Algas Marinas Chilenas. Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción, Chile: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B., 1989. Managing the wild crops, propagating and cultivating seaweeds in Chile. In E. C. Oliveira & N. Kautsky (eds), Cultivation of seaweeds in Latin America. Universidade de Saõ Paulo, Saõ Paulo, Brazil: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B., 1990a. Patterns of reproduction, dispersal and recruitment in Seaweeds. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 28: 177–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B., 1990b. Patterns of organization of intertidal and shallow subtidal vegetation in wave exposed habitats of central Chile. Hydrobiologia 192: 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B. & M. S. Doty, 1989. A review of Gracilaria farming. Aquaculture 78: 95–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B. & E. Fonck, 1979. Ecología y cultivo de Gracilaria lamanaeformis en Chile Central. In B. Santelices (ed.), Actas del Primer Simposio sobre Algas Marinas Chilenas. Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción, Chile: 165–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B., J. Vasquez, U. Ohme & E. Fonck, 1984. Managing wild crops of Gracilaria in central Chile. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 11: 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, R., 1993. Plucking or cutting Gelidium sesquipedale: A demographic simulation of harvest impact using a population projection matrix model. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 14: 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, W., 1979. Experimental investigation of disturbance and ecological succession in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 49: 227–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, W., 1984. Intertidal mosaics: patch size, propagule availability, and spatially variable patterns of succession. Ecology 65: 1918–1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermeier, R., P. J. Rivera & I. Gomez, 1991. Cultivo de Gracilaria chilensis Bird, McLachlan y Oliveira, en la zona intermareal y submareal del Estuario Cariquilda, Maullín, Chile. Revista chilena de Historia natural 64: 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santelices, B. Seaweed research and utilization in Chile: moving into a new phase. Hydrobiologia 326, 1–14 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047781

Key words

Navigation