Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation between populations and its measurement

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When applied to a family of sets, the term “differentiation” designates a measure of the totality of those members which appear in only one of the sets. This basic set theoretic concept involves the formation of intersections, unions, and complements of sets. However, populations as special kinds of sets may share types, but they do not share the carriers of these types; intersections of different populations are thus always empty. The resulting conceptual dilemma is resolved by considering the joint representation of members of different populations that have the same type; populations then intersect with respect to joint representation of types. Two forms of representation reflect relative and absolute characteristics of differentiation by accounting for the distributions of types as relative frequencies within populations (as is commonly done) and as absolute frequencies (including effects of population sizes on differentiation), respectively. Corresponding classes of differentiation measures are developed, and existing measures are discussed in relation to these classes. In particular, the affinity of the measurement of distances between populations and the special case of differentiation of two-population families is examined in order to distinguish between the notions of distance and differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Deichsel, G. and H.J. Trampisch (1985). Clusteranalyse und Diskriminanzanalyse. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorius, H.-R. (1974). Genetischer Abstand zwischen Populationen. I. Zur Konzeption der genetischen Abstandsmessung. Silvae Genetica 23: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorius, H.-R. and J.H. Roberds (1986). Measurement of genetical differentiation among subpopulations. Theor. Appl. Genetics 71: 826–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P.W. (1975). Genetical similarity and distance: comments and comparisons. Evolution 29: 362–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3321–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. (1975). Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution. North-Holland.

  • Pielou, E.C. (1977). Mathematical Ecology. New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevosti, A., J. Ocaña and G. Alonso (1975). Distances between populations of Drosophila subobscura, based on chromosome arrangement frequencies. Theor. Appl. Genetics 45: 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2: The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gregorius, HR. Differentiation between populations and its measurement. Acta Biotheor 44, 23–36 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046433

Keywords

Navigation