Skip to main content
Log in

Genotypic differences in cold tolerance are masked by high sucrose and cytokinin in shoot cultures of sugarbeet

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cold tolerance of field grown plants and shoot cultures of a commercial sugarbeet cultivar, ‘Hilma’, was compared with that of two cultivars bred for improved cold tolerance, ‘Monofeb’ and ‘Winter Hybrid 88619’. Leaves of ‘Monofeb’ and ‘Winter Hybrid 88619’ showed an increase in frost tolerance compared to Hilma, as assessed by electrolyte leakage measurements, in both July, and November. However, all varieties exhibited acclimation in the latter month. Similar qualitative differences between cultivars were detected in shoot cultures only when maintained on low (1%) sucrose medium, without added plant growth regulators. The use of high (3%) sucrose and benzyladenine, which releases apical dominance producing multiple shoots, each contributed to a substantial lowering of the temperature at which cold-induced damage occurred in leaves. Under these conditions varietal differences were masked. The implications of these findings in regard to in vitro selection for improved cold tolerance in organized cultures are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

benzyladenine

MS:

Murashige & Skoog (1962)

References

  • Atanassov AI (1986) Sugarbeet. In: Evans DA, Sharp WR & Ammirato PV (Eds) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol 4 (pp 652–680). Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannier LJ & Steponkus PL (1976) Cold acclimation ofChrysanthemum callus cultures. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101: 409–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin HA & Dix PJ (1990) Culture Systems and Selection Procedures. In: Dix PJ (Ed) Plant Cell Line Selection (pp 3–18). VCH Publishers, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGreef W & Jacobs M (1979) In vitro culture of sugarbeet: Description of a cell line with high regeneration capacity. Plant Sci. Lett. 17: 55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix PJ & Street HE (1976) Selection of plant cell lines with enhanced drilling resistance. Ann. Bot. 40: 903–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda V & Kacperska A (1983) Frost tolerance estimation in callus derived from poplar and winter rape using three different methods. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 111: 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffman NL, Eichholz D, Rogers SG & Fraley RT (1985) A simple method for transferring genes into plants. Science 277: 1221–1231

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey K & Gallois P (1990) Transformation of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) byAgrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Exp. Bot. 41: 529–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey K & Jones MGK (1990) Selection of transformed cells In: Dix PJ (Ed) Plant Cell Line Selection (pp 317–339) VCH Publishers. Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone RP & PJ (1990) Mutagenesis and triazine herbicide effects in strawberry shoot cultures. J. Exp. Bot 225: 463–469

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe PF, Timmons AM & Dix PJ (1989) A simple procedure for the isolation of streptomycin-resistant plants in Solanaceae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 216: 132–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for the rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor L & Fitzgerald P (1987) Out-of-season sugar beet-searching for bolting-resistant varieties. Farm and Food Research 18: 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce RS & McDonald I (1977) Ultrastructural damage due to freezing followed by thawing in shoot meristem and leaf cells of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Planta 134: 189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce RS & McDonald I (1978) An independent assessment of frost hardiness of excised laminae, excised roots and trimmed tillers of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). J. Appl. Ecol. 15: 885–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie GA, Short KC & Davey MR (1989) In vitro shoot regeneration from callus, leaf axils and petioles of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) J. Exp. Bot. 40: 277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JW (1982) A flexible in vitro shoot culture propagation system for sugarbeet that includes rapid floral induction of ramets. Crop Sci. 22: 1102–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan CP, Finch I, Dix PJ & Burke JI (1993) In vitro propagation systems in sugarbeet. Ir. J. Agtric. Food Res. 32: 27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Tétu T, Sangwan RS & Sangwan-Norreel BS (1987) Hormonal control of organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis inBeta vulgaris callus. J. Exp. Bot. 38: 506–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaajj AC, Jacobsen EJ, Feenstra WJ (1985) Effect of cold hardening, wilting and exogenously applied proline on leaf proline content and frost tolerance of several genotypes ofSolanum. Physiol. Plant 64: 230–236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dix, P.J., Finch, I. & Burke, J.I. Genotypic differences in cold tolerance are masked by high sucrose and cytokinin in shoot cultures of sugarbeet. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 36, 285–290 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046085

Key words

Navigation