Skip to main content
Log in

Forest types of northern Sweden

Introduction to and translation of ‘Det nordsvenska skogstypsschemat’

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The northern part of Sweden, making up nearly two-thirds of the whole country, belongs to the coniferous, oakless forests of the boreal region, the taiga of the northern hemisphere, Fig. 1. The two main tree species are the Norway spruce,Picea abies (L.) Karst., and Scots pine,Pinus silvestris L., and occur either alone or mixed, generally also with some deciduous trees; the most common being the birchesBetula pendula, Roth andB. pubescens, Ehrh.

The forests are rarely too dense to exclude a low ground vegetation with a field layer of dwarf-shrubs, herbs, ferns and grasses and a bottom layer of lichens and mosses. The plant species of both layers provide a fairly good indication of the characteristics of the site. The plant communities are even more reliable indicators of soil type and suitability of the site for growing trees. From the plant sociological point of view, the communities correspond to unions or associations forming ecosystems equal to forest types. These are named after the two main factorial systems, moisture/water and nutrients, and are ordinated into a scheme, here called the North-Swedish forest types scheme. These forest types provide information on the management of the forest at different sites, including the choice of the most suitable and economically most profitable trees and methods of regeneration, both natural as well as artificial. On forest land without trees, such as in a clearing, the phase of the forest type becomes quite different from the normal phase stabilized within a mature forest In a natural stand, as well as in a forest established by sowing or planting, the density of the canopy has great influence on the ground vegetation-and thus on the forest type. The different paths of succession and dynamics of these phases must be known.

The forest types scheme presented here in an English version was widely used in Sweden in teaching and training in forestry from 1945 to the late 1970's and is still used for pilot descriptions. Some new approaches by recent scientists and new systems, especially for the purpose of classification of the sites into quality classes, are briefly mentioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ArnborgT. 1940. Der Vallsjö-Wald, ein nordschwedischer Urwald. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica XIII: 128–163. Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • ArnborgT. 1943. Granberget. En växtbiologisk undersökning av ett sydlappländskt granskogsområde med särskild hänsyn till skogstyper och föryngring; Zusammenf.: Eine pflanzenbiologische Untersuchung eines südlappländischen Fichtenwaldgebiets unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Waldtypen under Verjüngung. Dissert. Norrländskt Handbibliotek XIV: 1–298. Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnborg, T. 1945, etc., 6th edit. 1964. Det nordsvenska skogstypsschemat. 1–25. Svenska skorgsvårdsför. Stockholm.

  • Arnborg, T. 1981. Northern Sweden Forest Type Classification. Translation of ‘Det nordsvenska skogstypsschemat’. CFS, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Translation Bureau. Secretary of State National Research Council Canada. pp. 30 mimeogr.

  • Arnborg, T. 1989. Forest types in northern Sweden. Introduction to an English version of ‘Det nordsvenska skogstypsschemat’. Forests of the world diversity and dynamics (Abstracts): 10–12. Studies in Plant Ecology, Vol. 18. Uppsala.

  • Arnborg, T. & Johnsson, H. 1963. The Swedish Forest Tree Breeding Association. 1–17. Uppsala.

  • CajanderA. 1909. Ueber Waldtypen. Acta Forestalia Fennica I: 1–175. Helsingfors.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuRietzG. E. 1936. Classification and nomenclature of vegetation units. Svensk botanisk tidskr. 30: 3. 580–589. Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • EbelingF. 1978. Nordsvenska Skogstyper. Sveriges skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift 1978: 339–381. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eneroth, O. 1937. Om skogstyperna och deras praktiska betydelse. Lantbruksakademiens handl. och tidskr. 75 (1936), Stockholm.

  • Hustich, I. editor, 1960. Forest types and forest ecosystems. Proceedings from the IX International Botanical Congress 1959, Montreal, Silva Fennica No. 105: 1–142. Also in: Society for Tropical Ecology, Vol. I, No. 2: 1. New Delhi.

  • Hägglund, B. & Lundmark, J.-E. 1984. Handledning i bonitering med Skogshögskolans boniteringssystem. Del 3 Markvegetationstyper-Skogsmarksfloran. Motala.

  • Hotanen, J. P. & Kuusipalo, J. 1989. The Finnish forst site type approach: An example of recent developments. Forests of the world diversity and dynamics (Abstracts): 117–120. Studies in plant ecology, Vol. 18 Uppsala.

  • KlinkaK., KrajinaV. J., CeskaA. & ScagelA. M. 1989. Indicator Plants of Coastal British Columbia. 1–288. University of British Columbia Press. Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnborg, T. Forest types of northern Sweden. Vegetatio 90, 1–13 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045585

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045585

Keywords

Navigation